Implementation and evaluation of an online anatomy, radiology and contouring bootcamp for radiation therapists.


Journal

Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences
ISSN: 1876-7982
Titre abrégé: J Med Imaging Radiat Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101469694

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
received: 16 07 2021
revised: 10 09 2021
accepted: 16 09 2021
pubmed: 13 10 2021
medline: 21 12 2021
entrez: 12 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

As new treatments and technologies have been introduced in radiation oncology, the clinical roles of radiation therapists (RTs) have expanded. However, there are few formal learning opportunities for RTs. An online, anatomy, radiology and contouring bootcamp (ARC Bootcamp) originally designed for medical residents was identified as a prospective educational tool for RTs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an RT edition of the ARC Bootcamp on knowledge, contouring, and confidence, as well as to identify areas for future modification. Fifty licensed RTs were enrolled in an eight-week, multidisciplinary, online RT ARC Bootcamp. Contouring practice was available throughout the course using an online contouring platform. Outcomes were evaluated using a pre-course and post-course multiple-choice quiz (MCQ), contouring evaluation and qualitative self-efficacy and satisfaction survey. Of the fifty enrolled RTs, 30 completed the course, and 26 completed at least one of the post-tests. Nineteen contouring dice similarity coefficient (DSC) scores were available for paired pre- and post-course analysis. RTs demonstrated a statistically significant increase in mean DSC scoring pooled across all contouring structures (mean ± SD improvement: 0.09 ± 0.18 on a scale from 0 to 1, p=0.020). For individual contouring structures, 3/15 reached significance in contouring improvement. MCQ scores were available for 26 participants and increased after RT ARC Bootcamp participation with a mean ± SD pre-test score of 18.6 ± 4.2 (46.5%); on a 40-point scale vs. post-test score of 24.5 ± 4.3 (61.4%) (p < 0.001). RT confidence in contouring, anatomy knowledge and radiographic identification improved after course completion (p < 0.001). Feedback from RTs recommended more contouring instruction, less in-depth anatomy review and more time to complete the course. The RT ARC Bootcamp was an effective tool for improving anatomy and radiographic knowledge among RTs. The course demonstrated improvements in contouring and overall confidence. However, only approximately half of the enrolled RTs completed the course, limiting statistical power. Future modifications will aim to increase relevance to RTs and improve completion rates.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
As new treatments and technologies have been introduced in radiation oncology, the clinical roles of radiation therapists (RTs) have expanded. However, there are few formal learning opportunities for RTs. An online, anatomy, radiology and contouring bootcamp (ARC Bootcamp) originally designed for medical residents was identified as a prospective educational tool for RTs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an RT edition of the ARC Bootcamp on knowledge, contouring, and confidence, as well as to identify areas for future modification.
METHODS
Fifty licensed RTs were enrolled in an eight-week, multidisciplinary, online RT ARC Bootcamp. Contouring practice was available throughout the course using an online contouring platform. Outcomes were evaluated using a pre-course and post-course multiple-choice quiz (MCQ), contouring evaluation and qualitative self-efficacy and satisfaction survey.
RESULTS
Of the fifty enrolled RTs, 30 completed the course, and 26 completed at least one of the post-tests. Nineteen contouring dice similarity coefficient (DSC) scores were available for paired pre- and post-course analysis. RTs demonstrated a statistically significant increase in mean DSC scoring pooled across all contouring structures (mean ± SD improvement: 0.09 ± 0.18 on a scale from 0 to 1, p=0.020). For individual contouring structures, 3/15 reached significance in contouring improvement. MCQ scores were available for 26 participants and increased after RT ARC Bootcamp participation with a mean ± SD pre-test score of 18.6 ± 4.2 (46.5%); on a 40-point scale vs. post-test score of 24.5 ± 4.3 (61.4%) (p < 0.001). RT confidence in contouring, anatomy knowledge and radiographic identification improved after course completion (p < 0.001). Feedback from RTs recommended more contouring instruction, less in-depth anatomy review and more time to complete the course.
CONCLUSIONS
The RT ARC Bootcamp was an effective tool for improving anatomy and radiographic knowledge among RTs. The course demonstrated improvements in contouring and overall confidence. However, only approximately half of the enrolled RTs completed the course, limiting statistical power. Future modifications will aim to increase relevance to RTs and improve completion rates.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34635471
pii: S1939-8654(21)00223-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2021.09.010
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

567-575

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Krista D'Angelo (K)

Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Paige Eansor (P)

Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Leah A D'Souza (LA)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.

Madeleine E Norris (ME)

Department of Anatomy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Glenn S Bauman (GS)

Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Zahra Kassam (Z)

Department of Medical Imaging, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.

Eric Leung (E)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Anthony C Nichols (AC)

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Manas Sharma (M)

Department of Radiology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Keng Yeow Tay (KY)

Department of Radiology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Vikram Velker (V)

Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Melissa O'Neil (M)

Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Sylvia Mitchell (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Carina Feuz (C)

Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Andrew Warner (A)

Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: andrew.warner@lhsc.on.ca.

Katherine E Willmore (KE)

Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Nicole Campbell (N)

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Heidi Probst (H)

Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

David A Palma (DA)

Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: david.palma@lhsc.on.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH