Consensus development of priority outcome domains for community mental health cares by multiple stakeholders: Protocol for an online Delphi study in Japan.
Delphi method
community mental health
consensus
outcome domain
patient and public involvement
protocol
Journal
Neuropsychopharmacology reports
ISSN: 2574-173X
Titre abrégé: Neuropsychopharmacol Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101719700
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
revised:
12
09
2021
received:
24
08
2021
accepted:
13
09
2021
pubmed:
13
10
2021
medline:
24
3
2022
entrez:
12
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Treatment goals for mental illness have expanded from hospital discharge and improved functioning to employment, living alone, and personal realization. These changes in treatment goals have also influenced mental health research. Recent studies have addressed the development of core outcome sets focusing on clinical aspects of mental illness such as depression and anxiety. However, a well-developed framework of essential outcomes for people with mental illness (service users) who live in the community is lacking. In addition, recent worldwide trends suggest more patient and public involvement and the importance of considering multiple stakeholders' views in the area of mental health research. Purpose of this study is to explore consensus on high-priority outcome domains among multiple stakeholders in community mental healthcare fields in Japan. A three-step approach to developing an outcome list will be used. First, we developed a long list of outcomes for community mental health through a literature review, focus group interviews with key stakeholders, and online questionnaire surveys of service users and caregivers. Second, the long list was checked and revised in a pilot study. Third, the long list will be shortened to the outcome list through the Delphi methodology with participation from multiple stakeholders. Identifying important common outcome domains through collaboration with multiple stakeholders appears to contribute to the development of evidence for community mental health research in Japan. In addition, the study process itself may help promote patient and public involvement in education, practice, and research in the field of community mental health.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Treatment goals for mental illness have expanded from hospital discharge and improved functioning to employment, living alone, and personal realization. These changes in treatment goals have also influenced mental health research. Recent studies have addressed the development of core outcome sets focusing on clinical aspects of mental illness such as depression and anxiety. However, a well-developed framework of essential outcomes for people with mental illness (service users) who live in the community is lacking. In addition, recent worldwide trends suggest more patient and public involvement and the importance of considering multiple stakeholders' views in the area of mental health research. Purpose of this study is to explore consensus on high-priority outcome domains among multiple stakeholders in community mental healthcare fields in Japan.
METHODS
A three-step approach to developing an outcome list will be used. First, we developed a long list of outcomes for community mental health through a literature review, focus group interviews with key stakeholders, and online questionnaire surveys of service users and caregivers. Second, the long list was checked and revised in a pilot study. Third, the long list will be shortened to the outcome list through the Delphi methodology with participation from multiple stakeholders.
DISCUSSION
Identifying important common outcome domains through collaboration with multiple stakeholders appears to contribute to the development of evidence for community mental health research in Japan. In addition, the study process itself may help promote patient and public involvement in education, practice, and research in the field of community mental health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34636183
doi: 10.1002/npr2.12211
pmc: PMC8698667
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
554-561Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Neuropsychopharmacology Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Neuropsychopharmacology.
Références
World Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;13(2):118-24
pubmed: 24890055
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2008 Apr-Jun;17(2):128-37
pubmed: 18589629
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2021 Dec;41(4):554-561
pubmed: 34636183
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;108:110-120
pubmed: 30557677
BMJ Open. 2020 May 12;10(5):e034215
pubmed: 32404388
Lancet. 2009 Jul 4;374(9683):86-9
pubmed: 19525005
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Mar 2;4:8
pubmed: 29507772
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 28;3(8):e3081
pubmed: 18769481
Qual Life Res. 2017 Dec;26(12):3211-3225
pubmed: 28786017
Trials. 2012 Aug 06;13:132
pubmed: 22867278
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2015 Aug;9(4):359-66
pubmed: 25905559
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jul 15;59(7):952-60
pubmed: 18576290
Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;212(1):4-5
pubmed: 29433606
Stat Methods Med Res. 2005 Oct;14(5):515-24
pubmed: 16248351
Health Soc Care Community. 1999 May;7(3):198-205
pubmed: 11560634
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 28;15(10):e0240518
pubmed: 33112874
Psychiatr Serv. 2002 Oct;53(10):1272-84
pubmed: 12364675