Experiences of Physical Therapists and Professional Leaders With Implementing a Toolkit to Advance Walking Assessment Poststroke: A Realist Evaluation.
Guidelines
Knowledge Translation
Standardized Assessment
Stroke
Toolkit
Walking
Journal
Physical therapy
ISSN: 1538-6724
Titre abrégé: Phys Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0022623
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2021
01 12 2021
Historique:
received:
18
11
2020
revised:
25
05
2021
accepted:
09
08
2021
pubmed:
13
10
2021
medline:
15
2
2022
entrez:
12
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The iWalk study showed significant increase in use of the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) poststroke following provision of a toolkit. This paper examined the influence of contextual circumstances on use of the toolkit and implementation strategy across acute care and inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation settings. A theory-based toolkit and implementation strategy was designed to support guideline recommendations to use standardized tools for evaluation of walking, education, and goal-setting poststroke. The toolkit comprised a mobile app, video, and educational guide outlining instructions for 3 learning sessions. After completing learning sessions, 33 physical therapists and 7 professional leaders participated in focus groups or interviews. As part of a realist evaluation, the study compared and synthesized site-specific context-mechanism-outcome descriptions across sites to refine an initial theory of how the toolkit would influence practice. Analysis revealed 3 context-mechanism-outcomes: (1) No onsite facilitator? No practice change in acute care: Without an onsite facilitator, participants lacked authority to facilitate and coordinate the implementation strategy; (2) Onsite facilitation fostered integration of select practices in acute care: When onsite facilitation occurred in acute care, walk test administration and use of reference values for patient education were adopted variably with high functioning patients; (3) Onsite facilitation fostered integration of most practices in rehabilitation settings: When onsite facilitation occurred, many participants incorporated 1 or both tests to evaluate and monitor walking capacity, and reference values were applied for inpatient and outpatient education and goal setting. Participants preferentially implemented the 10MWT over the 6MWT because set-up and administration were easier and a greater proportion of patients could walk 10 m. Findings underscore contextual factors and activities essential to eliciting change in assessment practice in stroke rehabilitation across care settings. This study shows that to foster recommended walking assessment practices, an onsite facilitator should be present to enable learning sessions and toolkit use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34636908
pii: 6380793
doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab232
pmc: PMC8715419
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Physical Therapy Association.
Références
Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):e98-e169
pubmed: 27145936
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2017 Jan;41(1):3-17
pubmed: 27977516
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011 Dec;35(4):194-201
pubmed: 22027474
Int J Stroke. 2017 Jul;12(5):451-461
pubmed: 28697709
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8
pubmed: 1991946
Phys Ther. 2013 Oct;93(10):1383-96
pubmed: 23704035
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2020 May;27(4):251-261
pubmed: 31752634
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jul;39(14):1449-1457
pubmed: 27374876
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Nov 27;:
pubmed: 33253695
Int J Stroke. 2020 Oct;15(7):763-788
pubmed: 31983296
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258
pubmed: 25791983
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Sep;82(9):1204-12
pubmed: 11552192
BMC Med. 2016 Jun 24;14(1):96
pubmed: 27342217
J Rehabil Med. 2011 May;43(6):543-9
pubmed: 21533335
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Mar;37(6):577-88
pubmed: 11879422
Physiother Res Int. 2008 Dec;13(4):255-70
pubmed: 18972323
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687
pubmed: 24609605
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2010 Jun 1;7(2):76-89
pubmed: 20180826
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Aug;27(4):836-846
pubmed: 32975895
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 May 29;284(6329):1607-8
pubmed: 6805625
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2021 Jan;45(1):21-27
pubmed: 33252456
J Nurs Educ. 2009 Dec;48(12):661-7
pubmed: 20000246
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995 Mar;27(1):27-36
pubmed: 7792547
Physiother Can. 2019 Winter;71(1):43-55
pubmed: 30787498
Int J Stroke. 2012 Feb;7(2):118-24
pubmed: 22103839
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jun;94(6):1048-53.e1
pubmed: 23415809
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2020 Jul/Sep;43(3):E1-E10
pubmed: 31373942
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Jan 16;:1-17
pubmed: 33459080
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986
NeuroRehabilitation. 2021;48(4):413-439
pubmed: 33967070
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285