Impact of technology-based interventions on linking potential kidney donors and transplant candidates: a scoping review.
digital health
information technology
living donor kidney transplant
Journal
Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation
ISSN: 1432-2277
Titre abrégé: Transpl Int
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 8908516
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
revised:
13
09
2021
received:
03
04
2021
accepted:
29
09
2021
pubmed:
13
10
2021
medline:
27
1
2022
entrez:
12
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite the demonstrated survival advantage in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients of a preemptive living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT), there has been a decline in LDKT among African American and Hispanic populations. We performed a scoping review and summarized the evidence about the use of technology-based interventions (TBI) to not only increase knowledge and awareness of LDKT but also link living donors with transplant candidates. We evaluated 31 studies and characterized them into "transplant-candidate facing" TBI, "transplant donor facing" TBI, and "interactive websites" targeting both donors and candidates. For the patient-facing interventions, 60% of studies suggested an increased likelihood of linking possible donors and candidates. The donor-facing interventions showed an increase in donor awareness and 75% of these interventions suggested increasing donor-candidate linkage. This study also demonstrates that TBI (regardless of medium) that are accessible and customized to the specific target population can potentially increase linkage of donors to recipients and serve as effective guides to connect potential donors to transplant candidates.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2781-2793Informations de copyright
© 2021 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Hunsicker LG. A survival advantage for renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1762.
Mange KC, Joffe MM, Feldman HI. Effect of the use or nonuse of long-term dialysis on the subsequent survival of renal transplants from living donors. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 726.
Meier-Kriesche HU, Kaplan B. Waiting time on dialysis as the strongest modifiable risk factor for renal transplant outcomes: a paired donor kidney analysis. Transplantation 2002; 74: 1377.
Gill JS, Tonelli M, Johnson N, Kiberd B, Landsberg D, Pereira BJ. The impact of waiting time and comorbid conditions on the survival benefit of kidney transplantation. Kidney Int 2005; 68: 2345.
Purnell TS, Luo X, Cooper LA, et al. Association of race and ethnicity with live donor kidney transplantation in the United States From 1995 to 2014. JAMA 2018; 319: 49.
Reed RD, Sawinski D, Shelton BA, et al. Population health, ethnicity, and rate of living donor kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2018; 102: 2080.
UNOS. Kidney Allocation system status update. https://unos.org/news/kidney-allocation-system-status-update/. Published 2014.
Vilme H, Davenport CA, Pendergast J, Boulware LE. Trends in African Americans' attitudes and behaviors about living donor kidney transplantation. Prog Transplant 2018; 28: 354.
Lunsford SL, Simpson KS, Chavin KD, et al. Racial disparities in living kidney donation: is there a lack of willing donors or an excess of medically unsuitable candidates? Transplantation 2006; 82: 876.
Purnell TS, Hall YN, Boulware LE. Understanding and overcoming barriers to living kidney donation among racial and ethnic minorities in the United States. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2012; 19: 244.
Boulware LE, Hill-Briggs F, Kraus ES, et al. Identifying and addressing barriers to African American and non-African American families' discussions about preemptive living related kidney transplantation. Prog Transplant 2011; 21: 97. quiz 105.
Lentine KL, Mandelbrot D. Addressing disparities in living donor kidney transplantation: a call to action. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 13: 1909.
Waterman AD, Robbins ML, Peipert JD. Educating prospective kidney transplant recipients and living donors about living donation: practical and theoretical recommendations for increasing living donation rates. Curr Transplant Rep 2016; 3: 1.
Boulware LE, Hill-Briggs F, Kraus ES, et al. Effectiveness of educational and social worker interventions to activate patients' discussion and pursuit of preemptive living donor kidney transplantation: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2013; 61: 476.
Lockwood MB, Saunders MR, Lee CS, Becker YT, Josephson MA, Chon WJ. Kidney transplant and the digital divide: is information and communication technology a barrier or a bridge to transplant for African Americans? Prog Transplant 2013; 23: 302.
Hussein WF, Bennett PN, Pace S, et al. The mobile health readiness of people receiving in-center hemodialysis and home dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 16: 98.
Barnieh L, Collister D, Manns B, et al. A scoping review for strategies to increase living kidney donation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2017; 12: 1518.
Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018; 18: 143.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097.
Wells GASB, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing teh quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analysis.
Axelrod DA, Kynard-Amerson CS, Wojciechowski D, et al. Cultural competency of a mobile, customized patient education tool for improving potential kidney transplant recipients' knowledge and decision-making. Clin Transplant 2017; 31: e12944.
Cabacungan AN, Diamantidis CJ, St Clair Russell J, et al. Development of a telehealth intervention to improve access to live donor kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 2019; 51: 665.
Cameron A. Use of social media to facilitate identification of potential living donors. Am J Transplant 2016; 16 (Suppl 1): 18.
Gordon EJ, Feinglass J, Carney P, et al. An interactive, bilingual, culturally targeted website about living kidney donation and transplantation for hispanics: development and formative evaluation. JMIR Res Protoc 2015; 4: e42.
Gordon EJ, Feinglass J, Carney P, et al. A culturally targeted website for hispanics/Latinos about living kidney donation and transplantation: a randomized controlled trial of increased knowledge. Transplantation 2016; 100: 1149.
Kumar K, King EA, Muzaale AD, et al. A smartphone app for increasing live organ donation. Am J Transplant 2016; 16: 3548.
Lee CT, Cheng CY, Yu TM, et al. Shared decision making increases living kidney transplantation and peritoneal dialysis. Transplant Proc 2019; 51: 1321.
Patzer RE, McPherson L, Basu M, et al. Effect of the iChoose Kidney decision aid in improving knowledge about treatment options among transplant candidates: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Transplant 2018; 18: 1954.
Sieverdes JC, Treiber FA, Mueller M, et al. Living organ video educated donors program for kidney transplant-eligible African Americans to approach potential donors: a proof of concept. Transplant Direct 2018; 4: e357.
Waterman ACY, Peipert JD, Beaumont JL, Anderson CS, Paiva AL, Robbins ML. Your path to transplant education increases patients’ transplant attitudes, knowledge, informed decision-making and pursuit: an randomized control trial. Am J Transplant 2019; 19: 420.
Braun H, Feiner J, Rroll G. Where do living donors come from? A comparison of potential living liver and kidney donors at a high-volume US center. Transplantation 2016; 100: S179.
Chang A, Anderson EE, Turner HT, Shoham D, Hou SH, Grams M. Identifying potential kidney donors using social networking web sites. Clin Transplant 2013; 27: E320.
Dreher A, Moore D. How are potential living kidney donors recruited? Am J Transplant 2016; 16.
Dubray BS, Shawar S, Rega S, et al. The impact of social media on self-referral patterns for living kidney donation: characteristics of respondents. Am J Transplant 2020; 20: 43.
Gamston F. Directed altruistic kidney donation- A single centre experience. Pediatric Transplant 2017; 21: 91.
Gareau AJ, Khan F, Stamm L, Berka N. Public solicitation for a living kidney donor: Effects on the transplant waiting list and HLA laboratory workload. Hum Immunol 2019; 80: 45.
Kazley AS, Hamidi B, Balliet W, Baliga P. Social media use among living kidney donors and recipients: survey on current practice and potential. J Med Int Res 2016; 18: 1.
Moore DR, Feurer ID, Zavala EY, et al. A web-based application for initial screening of living kidney donors: development, implementation and evaluation. Am J Transplant 2013; 13: 450.
Moore D, Zavala I, Feurer H, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a web-based application for initial screening of living kidney donors. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 59.
Ruelas M, Peele A, Webber AB, Lee B, Hirose R, Roberts JP. Living kidney donor candidate triage using web-based patient portal. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 79.
Simpson MA, Morin DS, Akoad MI, Pomposelli JJ, Pomfret EA. Non-traditional living donors. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 433.
Slaats D, Zuidema W, van de Wetering J, Hesselink D, Terkivatan T, Betjes M. Closing the knowledge gap: the successful launch of an interactive website dedicated to information on living kidney donor transplantation [abstract]. Am J Transplant 2015; 15(Suppl. 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/closing-the-knowledge-gap-the-successful-launch-of-an-interactive-website-dedicated-to-information-on-living-kidney-donor-transplantation/.
Tan M, Mulloy M, Pollinger H, Gibney E. Impact of social media on living kidney donation awareness. Am J Transplant 2014; 14: 836.
Webber A, Hirose R, Lee B, Peele A, Light C, Roberts JP. Successful use of an interactive web-based patient portal to directly evaluate potential living kidney donors. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 58.
Zuidema W, van de Wetering J, Weimar W, et al. Living kidney donors triggered by social media: do they donate? Transpl Int 2015; 28: 475.
Dreher A, Moore D. How are potential living kidney donors recruited? Am J Transplant 2016; 16(Suppl. 1): 29.
Gordon EJ, Shand J, Black A. Google analytics of a pilot mass and social media campaign targeting Hispanics about living kidney donation. Internet Interv 2016; 6: 40.
Kayler LK, Dolph B, Seibert R, Keller M, Cadzow R, Feeley TH. Development of the living donation and kidney transplantation information made easy (KidneyTIME) educational animations. Clin Transplant 2020; 34: e13830.
Moody EM, Clemens KK, Storsley L, et al. Improving on-line information for potential living kidney donors. Kidney Int 2007; 71: 1062.
Rodrigue JR, Feranil M, Lang J, Fleishman A. Readability, content analysis, and racial/ethnic diversity of online living kidney donation information. Clin Transplant 2017; 31: e13039.
Valizadeh-Haghi S, Rahmatizadeh S. Evaluation of the quality and accessibility of available websites on kidney transplantation. Urol J 2018; 15: 261.
Gordon EJ, Rodde J, Gil S, Caicedo JC. Quality of Internet education about living kidney donation for Hispanics. Prog Transplant 2012; 22: 294.
Singh K. Mobile health in dialysis: the best engagement medium is the one that's with patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 16: 12.