Isolation precautions cause minor delays in diagnostics and treatment of non-COVID patients.
COVID-19
Isolation precaution
Non-COVID-19
Patient outcome
Treatment delay
Journal
Infection prevention in practice
ISSN: 2590-0889
Titre abrégé: Infect Prev Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101777928
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
06
04
2021
accepted:
29
09
2021
pubmed:
14
10
2021
medline:
14
10
2021
entrez:
13
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Isolation precautions are essential prevent spread of COVID-19 infection but may have a negative impact on inpatient care. The impact of these measures on non-COVID-19 patients remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to investigate diagnostic and treatment delays related to isolation precautions, the associated patient outcome, and the predisposing risk factors for delays. This observational study was conducted in seven Helsinki region hospitals during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland. The study used data on all non-COVID-19 inpatients, who were initially isolated due to suspected COVID-19, to estimate whether isolation precautions resulted in diagnostic or treatment delays. Out of 683 non-COVID-19 patients, 33 (4.8%) had delays related to isolation precautions. Clinical condition deteriorated non-fatally in seven (1.0%) patients. The following events were associated with an increased risk of treatment or a diagnostic delay: more than three ward transfers ( The use of isolation precautions for patients who did not have COVID-19 had minor negative effects on patient outcomes. The present study underlines the importance of targeting diagnostic efforts to patients with unspecified symptoms and to those with a negative SARS-CoV-2 test result. Thorough investigations to achieve an accurate diagnosis improves the prognosis of patients and facilitates appropriate targeting of hospital resources.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Isolation precautions are essential prevent spread of COVID-19 infection but may have a negative impact on inpatient care. The impact of these measures on non-COVID-19 patients remains largely unexplored.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to investigate diagnostic and treatment delays related to isolation precautions, the associated patient outcome, and the predisposing risk factors for delays.
METHODS
METHODS
This observational study was conducted in seven Helsinki region hospitals during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland. The study used data on all non-COVID-19 inpatients, who were initially isolated due to suspected COVID-19, to estimate whether isolation precautions resulted in diagnostic or treatment delays.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Out of 683 non-COVID-19 patients, 33 (4.8%) had delays related to isolation precautions. Clinical condition deteriorated non-fatally in seven (1.0%) patients. The following events were associated with an increased risk of treatment or a diagnostic delay: more than three ward transfers (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The use of isolation precautions for patients who did not have COVID-19 had minor negative effects on patient outcomes. The present study underlines the importance of targeting diagnostic efforts to patients with unspecified symptoms and to those with a negative SARS-CoV-2 test result. Thorough investigations to achieve an accurate diagnosis improves the prognosis of patients and facilitates appropriate targeting of hospital resources.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34642658
doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100178
pii: S2590-0889(21)00067-6
pmc: PMC8492011
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100178Informations de copyright
© 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Healthcare Infection Society.
Références
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Dec;8(12):1192-1200
pubmed: 33038974
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3):
pubmed: 31992387
PLoS One. 2021 May 21;16(5):e0251661
pubmed: 34019562
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):e38
pubmed: 32502334
BMC Med. 2020 Oct 16;18(1):329
pubmed: 33066777
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):4927-4935
pubmed: 28748563
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Apr;17(2):110-8
pubmed: 22008712
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):e030371
pubmed: 32075820
Am J Infect Control. 2003 Oct;31(6):354-6
pubmed: 14608302
Eur Respir Rev. 2020 Apr 3;29(155):
pubmed: 32248146
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Aug;105(4):632-637
pubmed: 32485197
Emerg Med Australas. 2020 Dec;32(6):1034-1039
pubmed: 32794298
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Dec;8(12):1159
pubmed: 33129420
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 11;382(24):2368-2371
pubmed: 32302076
J Med Virol. 2021 Sep;93(9):5626-5629
pubmed: 33945636
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Nov;28(11):e1
pubmed: 30257883
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Mar;32(3):262-268
pubmed: 27752880
Clin Med (Lond). 2006 May-Jun;6(3):286-93
pubmed: 16826864
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;104:111-116
pubmed: 33352330
Ann Surg. 2020 Aug;272(2):e118-e124
pubmed: 32675513
Br J Cancer. 2005 Jun 6;92(11):1959-70
pubmed: 15870714
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Dec;8(12):1167-1168
pubmed: 33007240