Time and costs related to computer-assisted versus non-computer-assisted implant planning and surgery. A systematic review.

computer-assisted implant placement computer-assisted implant planning computer-assisted surgery costs dental implants guided implant surgery implant planning surgery time

Journal

Clinical oral implants research
ISSN: 1600-0501
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Implants Res
Pays: Denmark
ID NLM: 9105713

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2021
Historique:
revised: 25 03 2021
received: 10 12 2020
accepted: 05 05 2021
entrez: 13 10 2021
pubmed: 14 10 2021
medline: 15 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To study the time and costs involved with computer-assisted versus non-computer-assisted implant planning and placement. Based on the PICO question, "In patients receiving dental implants, is computer-assisted implant planning and surgery (CAIPS) compared to non-computer-assisted implant planning and surgery (non-CAIPS) beneficial in terms of treatment related costs and time involved?", a search path was created to perform an electronic search in the databases PubMed, PubMed Central, EMBASE, and Cochrane. The publication period of eligible publications extended from 01.01.2005 to 04.05.2020. Four independent reviewers reviewed the literature to identify studies that met the eligibility inclusion criteria. A further manual search of articles was performed, and gray literature was excluded. Corresponding authors of potentially eligible manuscripts were contacted for further information. Of the 1354 retrieved titles after the search were screened. Thirty-one articles have been identified to read the full text, resulting in four articles to be analyzed for the present review all of which were RCTs. In total, 182 partially and completely edentulous patients were treated with 416 implants following either non-computer-assisted or computer-assisted implant planning and surgery to determine the duration of the single working steps and the financial aspects of the different procedures. When evaluating the time and costs involved with the diagnostic and planning procedures in computer-assisted implant planning and surgery workflow protocols, one can summarize that these are higher than in the non-computer-assisted workflow protocols. The time involved with the procedures appears to be the driving factor when it comes to economic considerations. On the basis of the conclusions, also the time for the prosthetic restoration should be taken into account.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34642994
doi: 10.1111/clr.13862
pmc: PMC9292957
doi:

Substances chimiques

Dental Implants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

303-317

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45(6):721-732
pubmed: 29608793
Implant Dent. 2017 Aug;26(4):500-509
pubmed: 28731896
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Apr;19(2):280-295
pubmed: 27790821
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2014 Sep 05;12(2):70-80
pubmed: 24980683
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:25-42
pubmed: 24660188
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Oct;32 Suppl 21:303-317
pubmed: 34642994
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Oct 14;32(3):617–624
pubmed: 27741330
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:359-373
pubmed: 30328203
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Feb;30(2):131-138
pubmed: 30578650
Br Dent J. 2019 Jan 25;226(2):101-108
pubmed: 30679852
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 May-Jun;25(3):491-8
pubmed: 20556247
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:73-86
pubmed: 19663953
J Periodontol. 2018 Sep;89(9):1015-1024
pubmed: 29761505
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:416-435
pubmed: 30328191
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019 Sep;128(3):220-226
pubmed: 31227455
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Autumn;7(3):229-42
pubmed: 25237668
J Oral Implantol. 2014 Dec;40(6):670-8
pubmed: 25233441
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Dec 13;17(1):150
pubmed: 29237427
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Oct;28(10):1278-1290
pubmed: 27647536
Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct;66(1):228-46
pubmed: 25123771
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:92-109
pubmed: 19885437
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019 May/Jun;39(3):e71-e82
pubmed: 30986285
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018;38(Suppl):s49-s57
pubmed: 30118533

Auteurs

Tobias Graf (T)

Department of Prosthodontics, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Christine Keul (C)

Department of Prosthodontics, University Clinic, LMU Munich, Muenchen, Germany.

Daniel Wismeijer (D)

Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics Private Practice, The Netherlands.

Jan Frederik Güth (JF)

Department of Prosthodontics, University Clinic, LMU Munich, Muenchen, Germany.
Department of Prosthodontics, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH