Force production and muscle activation during partial vs. full range of motion in Paralympic Powerlifting.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
28
11
2020
accepted:
12
09
2021
entrez:
13
10
2021
pubmed:
14
10
2021
medline:
25
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Paralympic Powerlifting is a sport in which the strength of the upper limbs is assessed through bench press performance in an adapted specific bench. It is therefore essential to optimize training methods to maximize this performance. The aim of the present study was to compare force production and muscle activation involved in partial vs. full range of motion (ROM) training in Paralympic Powerlifting. Twelve male athletes of elite national level in Paralympic Powerlifting participated in the study (28.60 ± 7.60 years of age, 71.80 ± 17.90 kg of body mass). The athletes performed five sets of 5RM (repetition maximum), either with 90% of 1RM in full ROM or with a load of 130% 1RM in partial ROM. All subjects underwent both exercise conditions in consecutive weeks. Order assignment in the first week was random and counterbalanced. Fatigue index (FI), Maximum Isometric Force (MIF), Time to MIF (Time) and rate of force development (RFD) were determined by a force sensor. Muscle thickness was obtained using ultrasound images. All measures were taken pre- and post-training. Additionally, electromyographic signal (EMG) was evaluated in the last set of each exercise condition. Post-exercise fatigue was higher with full ROM as well as loss of MIF. Full ROM also induced greater. EMG showed greater activation of the Clavicular portion and Sternal portion of pectoralis major muscle and lower in the anterior portion of deltoid muscle when full ROM was performed. Muscle thickness of the pectoralis major muscle increased post-exercise. We concluded that training with partial ROM enables higher workloads with lower loss of muscle function.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34644331
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257810
pii: PONE-D-20-37456
pmc: PMC8513888
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0257810Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Aug;31(8):2223-2230
pubmed: 27398917
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Apr 01;56(4):
pubmed: 32244628
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Jan;116(1):77-84
pubmed: 26293124
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jul;32(7):1843-1851
pubmed: 28682930
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Nov;28(11):3293-7
pubmed: 24845210
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1985 Jun;17(3):344-53
pubmed: 4021780
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010 Jun;25(5):450-4
pubmed: 20350773
J Strength Cond Res. 2005 May;19(2):409-11
pubmed: 15903383
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195203
pubmed: 29621305
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jun;31(6):1688-1693
pubmed: 28538321
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989 Feb;21(1):84-9
pubmed: 2927306
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 Apr 1;14(4):531-535
pubmed: 30204509
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Sep;22(5):1716-9
pubmed: 18714211
J Strength Cond Res. 2004 Aug;18(3):518-21
pubmed: 15320644
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017 Mar 1;122(3):559-570
pubmed: 28035017
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986 Aug;67(8):530-5
pubmed: 3741078
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Sep 26;:
pubmed: 31567719
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):116-8
pubmed: 14639480
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Mar;25(3):704-11
pubmed: 20581702
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Aug;26(8):2140-5
pubmed: 22027847
Acta Physiol Scand. 1993 Aug;148(4):379-85
pubmed: 8213193