CoronaCare study protocol: an ethnographic study of the risks to and potential for social health during the COVID-19 pandemic.

COVID-19 epidemiology public health qualitative research social medicine

Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 10 2021
Historique:
entrez: 14 10 2021
pubmed: 15 10 2021
medline: 21 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

German government regulations such as physical distancing and limited group numbers, designed to curb the spread of COVID-19, have had far-reaching consequences for the very foundations of social life. They have, to name only a few, transformed greetings and goodbyes, blurred private and public worlds, and complicated basic communication with mandatory mask wearing. The ethnographic study CoronaCare investigates how these sociopolitical measures affect social health, a form of health which unfolds through and across social relations. It explores how caring as a fundamental human activity and one integral to sustaining social health is impacted when in-person and person-to-person contacts are restricted and everyone is radically redefined as at risk from others and a risk to others. It explores care relationships, relationships involving the giving or receiving of care in everyday life, institutional settings such as an assisted living facility, and informal settings, such as a housing block. Inside of the pandemic, relationships are a pivotal site at which the negotiation of caring and risk is intensified and where the consequences for social health and social life more generally are pronounced. This ethnographic project aims to understand the tensions that arise in the lives of individuals and communities living under the sociopolitical regulations and to analyse the tacit forms of practice that individuals and communities develop to uphold social health. Fueled by citizen science, the ethnography uses a variety of methods namely telephone and video interviews with 60-70 research participants, the collection of ethnographic material including video and audio diaries, storyboards, first-person camera footage, photographs and a survey to enrich the sample description based on the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. The analysis will draw on elements of grounded theory and through the aid of the qualitative software MAXQDA it will rigorously document and explain how the social regulations are (re)shaping our ability to be cared for and to care for one another. The survey data will be analysed through the use of the quantitative software programme R. The ethics committee of the Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane has approved the project (E-01-20200605). The dissemination strategy includes publications in medical, sociological and research methods journals, as well as a stakeholder discussion with political and civil society leaders where the research team will present its recommendations for future pandemic preparedness.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34645659
pii: bmjopen-2020-048212
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048212
pmc: PMC8520589
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e048212

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jun 1;180(6):817-818
pubmed: 32275292
Cult Med Psychiatry. 1999 Mar;23(1):7-24
pubmed: 10388941
N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 11;368(15):1376-7
pubmed: 23574117
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Sep - Oct;14(5):779-788
pubmed: 32526627
Clin Psychol Sci. 2015 Jun 1;3(4):516-529
pubmed: 26413428
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;66(6):525-527
pubmed: 32349580
Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 22;8:571808
pubmed: 33072710
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Jun;29(3):315-318
pubmed: 32277578
Psychiatr Prax. 2020 May;47(4):179-189
pubmed: 32340047
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;265:113299
pubmed: 32905964

Auteurs

Joshua Paul (J)

Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany joshua.paul@mhb-fontane.de.

Sibille Merz (S)

Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.

Andreas Bergholz (A)

Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.

Franziska König (F)

Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.

Christian Apfelbacher (C)

Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Astrid Eich-Krohm (A)

Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Julia Weigt (J)

Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Christine Holmberg (C)

Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH