Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Severe Femoral Torsion.
PASS
Patient Acceptable Symptom State
SCB
femoral torsion
femoroacetabular impingement syndrome
hip arthroscopy
magnetic resonance imaging
substantial clinical benefit
Journal
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
10
04
2021
accepted:
04
05
2021
entrez:
14
10
2021
pubmed:
15
10
2021
medline:
15
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The influence of femoral torsion on clinically significant outcome improvement after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) has not been well-studied. To quantify femoral torsion in FAIS patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and explore the relationship between femoral torsion and clinically significant outcome improvement after hip arthroscopy. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Included were patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAIS between January 2012 and August 2018 and had 2-year follow-up and preoperative MRI scans containing transcondylar slices of the knee. Participants were categorized as having severe retrotorsion (SR; <0°), normal torsion (NT; 0°-25°), and severe antetorsion (SA; >25°) as measured on MRI. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) included the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale, modified Harris Hip Score, 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction. Achievement of Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) were analyzed among cohorts. Included were 183 patients (SR, n = 13; NT, n = 154; SA, n = 16) with a mean age, body mass index, and femoral torsion of 30.6 ± 12.1 years, 24.0 ± 4.4 kg/m The orientation and severity of femoral torsion during hip arthroscopy influenced the propensity for clinically significant outcome improvement. Specifically, patients with femoral retrotorsion and femoral antetorsion had higher and lower rates of clinically significant outcome improvement, respectively.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The influence of femoral torsion on clinically significant outcome improvement after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) has not been well-studied.
PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
To quantify femoral torsion in FAIS patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and explore the relationship between femoral torsion and clinically significant outcome improvement after hip arthroscopy.
STUDY DESIGN
METHODS
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS
METHODS
Included were patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAIS between January 2012 and August 2018 and had 2-year follow-up and preoperative MRI scans containing transcondylar slices of the knee. Participants were categorized as having severe retrotorsion (SR; <0°), normal torsion (NT; 0°-25°), and severe antetorsion (SA; >25°) as measured on MRI. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) included the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale, modified Harris Hip Score, 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction. Achievement of Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) were analyzed among cohorts.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Included were 183 patients (SR, n = 13; NT, n = 154; SA, n = 16) with a mean age, body mass index, and femoral torsion of 30.6 ± 12.1 years, 24.0 ± 4.4 kg/m
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The orientation and severity of femoral torsion during hip arthroscopy influenced the propensity for clinically significant outcome improvement. Specifically, patients with femoral retrotorsion and femoral antetorsion had higher and lower rates of clinically significant outcome improvement, respectively.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34646896
doi: 10.1177/23259671211034588
pii: 10.1177_23259671211034588
pmc: PMC8504247
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
23259671211034588Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: S.F.D. has received education payments from Medical Device Business Services and Zimmer Biomet. J.C.W. has received consulting fees from DePuy, speaking fees from Synthes GmbH, honoraria from Allergan, and hospitality payments from Zimmer Biomet. S.J.N. has received education payments from Elite Orthopedics; research support from Allosource, Athletico, DJO, Linvatec, Miomed, Ossur, Smith & Nephew, and Stryker; consulting fees from Ossur and Stryker; and royalties from Ossur, Springer, and Stryker. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Références
Arthrosc Tech. 2013 Mar 17;2(2):e89-94
pubmed: 23875156
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1948 Jul;30A(3):745-51
pubmed: 18109784
Arthroscopy. 2012 Jul;28(7):965-71
pubmed: 22305298
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973 Dec;55(8):1726-38
pubmed: 4804993
Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1324-1330
pubmed: 29570354
Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Aug 28;6(4):e1405-e1410
pubmed: 29354448
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul;205(1):130-5
pubmed: 26102391
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981 Jul;137(1):97-101
pubmed: 6787898
Am J Sports Med. 2012 May;40(5):1107-12
pubmed: 22392560
Clin Sports Med. 2016 Jul;35(3):503-521
pubmed: 27343399
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Dec;81(12):1747-70
pubmed: 10608388
Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar;31(3):454-9
pubmed: 25498873
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):123-130
pubmed: 30781991
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Nov;47(13):3133-3140
pubmed: 31603720
Arthroscopy. 2008 Jun;24(6):676-82
pubmed: 18514111
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Aug;209(2):W93-W99
pubmed: 28570094
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Oct 27;5(10):2325967117732726
pubmed: 29124076
J Pediatr Orthop. 2017 Dec;37(8):557-562
pubmed: 28323254
HSS J. 2019 Jul;15(2):103-108
pubmed: 31327939
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jan 20;98(2):127-34
pubmed: 26791033
Arthroscopy. 2012 May;28(5):619-27
pubmed: 22301362
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Feb 7;100(3):205-210
pubmed: 29406341
Arthrosc Tech. 2014 Jan 10;3(1):e83-8
pubmed: 24749047
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998 Jul-Aug;22(4):610-4
pubmed: 9676454
Arthroscopy. 2006 Dec;22(12):1304-11
pubmed: 17157729
Am J Sports Med. 2017 May;45(6):1297-1303
pubmed: 28298057
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Nov;452:216-24
pubmed: 16760822
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Apr 1;97(7):537-43
pubmed: 25834077
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2634-42
pubmed: 25214529
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Mar;469(3):831-8
pubmed: 20886325
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):381-390
pubmed: 32515680
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jan;46(1):122-134
pubmed: 28937786
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1388-95
pubmed: 25475714
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1844-9
pubmed: 26078452
Gait Posture. 2017 Jul;56:82-88
pubmed: 28521149
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018 Jun;11(2):272-279
pubmed: 29696606
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959 Apr;41-A(3):421-8
pubmed: 13641293
Arthroscopy. 2019 Nov;35(11):3035-3046
pubmed: 31629582
Arthroscopy. 2015 Jan;31(1):35-41
pubmed: 25217206
Orthopedics. 2013 Mar;36(3):e293-300
pubmed: 23464948
Instr Course Lect. 2003;52:711-9
pubmed: 12690896
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Sep;136(9):1259-1264
pubmed: 27501703
Arthroscopy. 2012 May;28(5):611-6; quiz 616-8
pubmed: 22542434
J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Jun;27(6):308-11
pubmed: 23032191