Serial dependence in the perceptual judgments of radiologists.
Priming
Radiological screening
Sequential dependence
Sequential effects
Serial dependence
Visual search
Journal
Cognitive research: principles and implications
ISSN: 2365-7464
Titre abrégé: Cogn Res Princ Implic
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101697632
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 10 2021
14 10 2021
Historique:
received:
02
10
2020
accepted:
21
08
2021
entrez:
14
10
2021
pubmed:
15
10
2021
medline:
6
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In radiological screening, clinicians scan myriads of radiographs with the intent of recognizing and differentiating lesions. Even though they are trained experts, radiologists' human search engines are not perfect: average daily error rates are estimated around 3-5%. A main underlying assumption in radiological screening is that visual search on a current radiograph occurs independently of previously seen radiographs. However, recent studies have shown that human perception is biased by previously seen stimuli; the bias in our visual system to misperceive current stimuli towards previous stimuli is called serial dependence. Here, we tested whether serial dependence impacts radiologists' recognition of simulated lesions embedded in actual radiographs. We found that serial dependence affected radiologists' recognition of simulated lesions; perception on an average trial was pulled 13% toward the 1-back stimulus. Simulated lesions were perceived as biased towards the those seen in the previous 1 or 2 radiographs. Similar results were found when testing lesion recognition in a group of untrained observers. Taken together, these results suggest that perceptual judgements of radiologists are affected by previous visual experience, and thus some of the diagnostic errors exhibited by radiologists may be caused by serial dependence from previously seen radiographs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34648124
doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00331-z
pii: 10.1186/s41235-021-00331-z
pmc: PMC8517058
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
65Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA236793
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;21(7):493-497
pubmed: 28549826
Perception. 1980;9(3):339-44
pubmed: 7454514
Front Neuroinform. 2009 Jan 15;2:10
pubmed: 19198666
Curr Biol. 2014 Nov 3;24(21):2569-74
pubmed: 25283781
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Aug;175(2):541-4
pubmed: 10915712
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):19937
pubmed: 31882657
Acad Med. 2003 Aug;78(8):775-80
pubmed: 12915363
Radiology. 1975 Sep;116(3):527-32
pubmed: 125436
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 1;112(48):14990-5
pubmed: 26627250
J Vis. 2016 Dec 1;16(15):28
pubmed: 28006077
Acad Radiol. 1996 Dec;3(12):1000-6
pubmed: 9017014
Curr Biol. 2017 Jul 24;27(14):R700-R701
pubmed: 28743014
Curr Biol. 2020 Mar 23;30(6):R257-R258
pubmed: 32208145
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 27;111(21):7867-72
pubmed: 24821771
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Sep;201(3):611-7
pubmed: 23971454
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Dec;161(6):1167-72
pubmed: 8249720
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 7;7(1):14739
pubmed: 29116132
J Neurosci. 2012 Feb 15;32(7):2335-43
pubmed: 22396408
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 17;6:22740
pubmed: 26986828
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Jun;21(3):777-84
pubmed: 24395093
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Aug;23(8):1016-1024
pubmed: 32572236
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jun 25;13:213
pubmed: 31293407
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 May;188(5):1173-8
pubmed: 17449754
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jun 21;113(25):E3548-57
pubmed: 27330086
PLoS Biol. 2019 Mar 5;17(3):e3000144
pubmed: 30835720
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Nov;136(4):623-38
pubmed: 17999575
Sci Rep. 2017 May 16;7(1):1971
pubmed: 28512359
Radiology. 2011 Dec;261(3):1000-1; author reply 1001-2
pubmed: 22096004
Curr Biol. 2021 Mar 22;31(6):1245-1250.e2
pubmed: 33373639
Cognition. 2020 Jul;200:104250
pubmed: 32155467
Neurosci Conscious. 2015 Dec 31;2015(1):niv010
pubmed: 30619623
Perception. 2012;41(1):43-9
pubmed: 22611662
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Mar;202(3):465-70
pubmed: 24555582
Nature. 2005 May 26;435(7041):439-40
pubmed: 15917795
J Radiol. 2004 Dec;85(12 Pt 2):2071-8
pubmed: 15692422
J Vis. 2018 Sep 4;18(9):15
pubmed: 30242385
Radiographics. 2015 Oct;35(6):1668-76
pubmed: 26466178
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 May 15;162(1-2):8-13
pubmed: 17254636
J Vis. 2008 Nov 24;8(15):15.1-17
pubmed: 19146299
PLoS One. 2013 May 30;8(5):e64366
pubmed: 23737980
J Vis. 2019 May 1;19(5):21
pubmed: 31112999
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Oct 31;285(1890):
pubmed: 30381379
Radiology. 2001 Apr;219(1):192-202
pubmed: 11274556
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 May;77(4):1081-7
pubmed: 25720760
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 31;6(1):e16701
pubmed: 21304953
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 01;6:32239
pubmed: 27582115
J Vis. 2014 Jun 18;14(7):
pubmed: 24944238
Curr Biol. 2017 Feb 20;27(4):590-595
pubmed: 28162897
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Apr;208(4):739-749
pubmed: 28026210
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Apr;83(3):1230-1239
pubmed: 32333372
Acad Radiol. 1996 Feb;3(2):137-44
pubmed: 8796654
J Vis. 2016 Dec 1;16(15):16
pubmed: 28006066
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Aug;80(6):1461-1473
pubmed: 29736808
J Neurosci. 2017 Apr 19;37(16):4381-4390
pubmed: 28330878
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 11;8(10):e76175
pubmed: 24146833
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 2;10(1):10959
pubmed: 32616792
J Vis. 2017 Dec 1;17(14):6
pubmed: 29209696
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 11;9(1):18841
pubmed: 31827138
Nat Neurosci. 2014 May;17(5):738-43
pubmed: 24686785
Curr Biol. 2013 May 20;23(10):R438-9
pubmed: 23701683
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2017 Dec;23(4):369-385
pubmed: 28541075
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2245-2253
pubmed: 29582377
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018;3(1):3
pubmed: 29399622
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010 Jun;16(2):133-44
pubmed: 20565198
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):226-35
pubmed: 26756902
J Vis. 2019 Nov 1;19(13):21
pubmed: 31770772
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Jul 8;287(1930):20200825
pubmed: 32635869