Possible Causes for Failure of Endodontic Surgery - A Retrospective Series of 20 Resurgery Cases.
Journal
European endodontic journal
ISSN: 2548-0839
Titre abrégé: Eur Endod J
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101717480
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2021
08 2021
Historique:
entrez:
15
10
2021
pubmed:
16
10
2021
medline:
1
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to evaluate unsuccessful endodontic surgery cases for possible causes for treatment failure and evaluate if a nonsurgical retreatment (NSRTX) approach could have been a better alternative to resurgery. Analyses of clinical and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, periapical radiographs, and chart documentation determined study parameters. Preoperative factors were age, sex, tooth type, signs and/or symptoms, presence of periapical radiolucency, previous root canal treatment, timeline since previous endodontic surgery, presence of posts, cores, and restorations. The intra-operative factors were microsurgical classification, previous techniques, and current techniques utilized. Postoperative factors were signs and/or symptoms, time to follow-up, and healing status. The accessibility of the root canal system and the quality of the existing root filling were used to evaluate NSRTX as an alternative to resurgery. A total of 1073 surgical cases from 2011-2019 were reviewed. In 14 patients, 20 cases matched the inclusion criteria and allowed for data extraction. The mean time since the previous surgery was 2.9+-2.1 years, with a mean follow-up of 9.1+-5.8 months after the resurgery. Possible reasons for failure identified were: insufficient root-end filling (leaking, off-axis preparation, lack of depth, overfill) n=12/20, 60.0%; missed anatomy (main and lateral canals, isthmus) n=9/20, 45.0%; incomplete resection n=6/20, 30.0%. In 18/20 cases (90.0%), resurgery appeared to be indicated for 2/20 cases (10.0%). Therefore, NSRTX may have been a potential alternative. Further evidence for possible causes of failure of endodontic surgery was provided, which were primarily iatrogenic. The evaluation of CBCT and high magnification intra-operative images proved beneficial for identifying critical issues for all investigated cases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34650019
doi: 10.14744/eej.2021.14238
pmc: PMC8461483
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
235-241Références
J Endod. 2006 Jul;32(7):601-23
pubmed: 16793466
Int Endod J. 2005 May;38(5):320-7
pubmed: 15876296
J Endod. 2011 Jul;37(7):927-33
pubmed: 21689546
J Endod. 2016 Apr;42(4):538-41
pubmed: 26873567
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987 Aug;16(4):432-9
pubmed: 3117915
J Endod. 2004 Oct;30(10):712-5
pubmed: 15448465
Dent Clin North Am. 1997 Jul;41(3):603-17
pubmed: 9248694
J Endod. 2020 Feb;46(2):252-257
pubmed: 31831180
J Endod. 1990 Aug;16(8):391-3
pubmed: 2081958
J Endod. 2008 Jun;34(6):660-5
pubmed: 18498884
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2007 Jul;28(7):391-7; quiz 398, 407
pubmed: 17687901
Int Endod J. 2000 Mar;33(2):91-8
pubmed: 11307456
Int Endod J. 1995 Sep;28(5):231-8
pubmed: 8626204
J Endod. 2012 Jan;38(1):1-10
pubmed: 22152611
J Endod. 2016 Oct;42(10):1472-5
pubmed: 27576210
J Endod. 2010 Nov;36(11):1757-65
pubmed: 20951283
Endod Dent Traumatol. 1994 Jun;10(3):105-8
pubmed: 7995237
J Endod. 2019 Jan;45(1):6-19
pubmed: 30527594
J Endod. 2016 Mar;42(3):356-64
pubmed: 26902914
J Endod. 2015 May;41(5):613-20
pubmed: 25702855
Dent Clin North Am. 1997 Jul;41(3):529-40
pubmed: 9248689
J Endod. 2011 May;37(5):577-8; author reply 578-80
pubmed: 21496650
Int J Oral Surg. 1972;1(4):215-28
pubmed: 4199169
J Endod. 2013 Mar;39(3):332-9
pubmed: 23402503
Br Dent J. 1970 Nov 3;129(9):407-13
pubmed: 5278365
J Endod. 2018 Nov;44(11):1632-1640
pubmed: 30243664
J Endod. 1994 Jan;20(1):22-6
pubmed: 8182382
J Endod. 2018 Jun;44(6):923-931
pubmed: 29681480
Int Endod J. 2001 Apr;34(3):169-75
pubmed: 12193261
J Endod. 1996 May;22(5):264-8
pubmed: 8632141
J Endod. 2016 Jul;42(7):1110-3
pubmed: 27178248
Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991 Dec;7(6):246-50
pubmed: 1820856