Validation of GeneXpert testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in eight hospital laboratories in Oman.
COVID-19
/ diagnosis
COVID-19 Testing
/ methods
Clinical Laboratory Techniques
Cross-Sectional Studies
Humans
Laboratories, Hospital
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques
/ methods
Oman
Point-of-Care Testing
RNA, Viral
/ genetics
SARS-CoV-2
/ isolation & purification
Sensitivity and Specificity
Specimen Handling
Viral Load
COVID-19
RT-PCR
SARS-CoV-2
comparison
coronavirus
Journal
The Pan African medical journal
ISSN: 1937-8688
Titre abrégé: Pan Afr Med J
Pays: Uganda
ID NLM: 101517926
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
30
11
2020
accepted:
04
08
2021
entrez:
15
10
2021
pubmed:
16
10
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In response to the current COVID-19 pandemic, numerous commercial assays have been developed for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 for use in the clinical diagnostic laboratories. To date, there is limited comparison of testing methods performed in different hospital laboratory sites. The aims of the study were to evaluate the analytical performance of Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 when compared to RT-PCR. This is a cross-sectional study. A total of 155 nasopharyngeal swabs were taken in duplicate from patients presenting with suspected COVID-19 to 8 hospitals in Oman. One swab was tested by the hospital laboratory and the duplicate swab was sent to the national Central Public Health Laboratory (CPHL) for testing. We compared the analytical performance of the commercially available point of care Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay which was used in the 8 different hospitals with assays including Liferiver, Sansure, TIB MOL BIOL, Kingfisher and COBAS 6800 by Roche which were performed at the CPHL. Testing of the duplicate swabs revealed excellent agreement of results with the viral loads of Ct values ranging from 16-43 for the E gene, 18-44 for the N gene and 17-44 for the ORF gene using the Liferiver assay. The overall sample sensitivity and specificity of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay were both 100% and there was 100% agreement across specimens. We conclude that the rapid GeneXpert and RT-PCR kits assessed in this study may be used for routine diagnostic testing of COVID-19 patients by experienced clinical microbiology diagnostic laboratories. Our results highlight the importance of rapid molecular testing at different sites within a country in a public health emergency.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34650652
doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.40.2.27224
pii: PAMJ-40-2
pmc: PMC8490169
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Viral
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2Informations de copyright
Copyright: Nawal Al-Kindi et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interests.
Références
J Clin Virol. 2020 Sep;130:104578
pubmed: 32777761
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8):
pubmed: 32332061
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8):
pubmed: 32366669
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Dec;8(12):e1457-e1458
pubmed: 33091372
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 May 26;58(6):
pubmed: 32245835
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3):
pubmed: 31992387
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733
pubmed: 31978945
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;97:225-229
pubmed: 32535302
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):929-936
pubmed: 32004427
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 May 26;58(6):
pubmed: 32269100
Oman Med J. 2020 Jun 30;35(3):e145
pubmed: 32647593
J Virol Methods. 2020 Oct;284:113925
pubmed: 32659240
Clin Chem. 2020 Apr 1;66(4):549-555
pubmed: 32031583
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):747-756
pubmed: 32196430