Catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment after caesarean section in Sierra Leone: An evaluation of the free health care initiative.
Adolescent
Adult
Cesarean Section
/ economics
Cost of Illness
Delivery of Health Care
/ economics
Family Characteristics
Female
Financing, Personal
/ statistics & numerical data
Health Expenditures
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Maternal Health
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
Sierra Leone
Social Factors
Young Adult
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
16
02
2021
accepted:
29
09
2021
entrez:
15
10
2021
pubmed:
16
10
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Utilizing surgical services, including caesarean sections, can result in catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment. In 2010, Sierra Leone introduced the Free Health Care Initiative (FHCI), a national financial risk protection program for the most vulnerable groups. Aim of this study was to investigate catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment related to caesarean section in Sierra Leone and evaluate the impact of the FHCI. Women who delivered by caesarean section in nine hospitals were followed up with home visits one month after surgery, and data on medical and non-medical expenditures were collected. Individual income was estimated based on household characteristics and used to determine catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment for each patient. The impact of the FHCI was assessed by comparing actual expenditure with counterfactual expenditures had the initiative not existed. For the 1146 patients in the study, the median expenditure was 23 (IQR 4; 56) international dollars (Int$). Patients in the poorest quintile spent a median Int$ 59 (IQR 28; 76), which was significantly more than patients in the richest quintile, who spent a median Int$ 17 (IQR 2; 38, p<0.001). Travel (32.9%) and food (28.7%) were the two largest expenses. Catastrophic expenditure was encountered by 12.0% and 4.0% (10% and 25% threshold, respectively) of the women. Without the FHCI, 66.1% and 28.8% of the women would have encountered catastrophic expenditure. Many women in Sierra Leone face catastrophic expenditure related to caesarean section, mainly through food and travel expenses, and the poor are disproportionally affected. The FHCI is effective in reducing the risk of catastrophic expenditure related to caesarean section, but many patients are still exposed to financial hardship, suggesting that additional support is needed for Sierra Leone's poorest patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Utilizing surgical services, including caesarean sections, can result in catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment. In 2010, Sierra Leone introduced the Free Health Care Initiative (FHCI), a national financial risk protection program for the most vulnerable groups. Aim of this study was to investigate catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment related to caesarean section in Sierra Leone and evaluate the impact of the FHCI.
METHODS
Women who delivered by caesarean section in nine hospitals were followed up with home visits one month after surgery, and data on medical and non-medical expenditures were collected. Individual income was estimated based on household characteristics and used to determine catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment for each patient. The impact of the FHCI was assessed by comparing actual expenditure with counterfactual expenditures had the initiative not existed.
RESULTS
For the 1146 patients in the study, the median expenditure was 23 (IQR 4; 56) international dollars (Int$). Patients in the poorest quintile spent a median Int$ 59 (IQR 28; 76), which was significantly more than patients in the richest quintile, who spent a median Int$ 17 (IQR 2; 38, p<0.001). Travel (32.9%) and food (28.7%) were the two largest expenses. Catastrophic expenditure was encountered by 12.0% and 4.0% (10% and 25% threshold, respectively) of the women. Without the FHCI, 66.1% and 28.8% of the women would have encountered catastrophic expenditure.
CONCLUSION
Many women in Sierra Leone face catastrophic expenditure related to caesarean section, mainly through food and travel expenses, and the poor are disproportionally affected. The FHCI is effective in reducing the risk of catastrophic expenditure related to caesarean section, but many patients are still exposed to financial hardship, suggesting that additional support is needed for Sierra Leone's poorest patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34653191
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258532
pii: PONE-D-21-05259
pmc: PMC8519447
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0258532Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348
pubmed: 30322584
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Mar 1;91(3):207-16
pubmed: 23476093
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 3;19(1):352
pubmed: 31159785
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Sep 4;4(5):e001605
pubmed: 31565407
World J Surg. 2016 Jul;40(7):1537-41
pubmed: 26932877
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Apr;33(2):434-448
pubmed: 29327367
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Feb;36(1):115-120
pubmed: 33256859
Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(2):e129-e137
pubmed: 30620069
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Mar 1;94(3):201-209F
pubmed: 26966331
Ann Surg. 2018 Jun;267(6):1093-1099
pubmed: 28394867
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e334-45
pubmed: 25103302
Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Feb;21(2):245-52
pubmed: 26584606
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Apr 27;3 Suppl 2:S38-44
pubmed: 25926319
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jun 5;17(1):71
pubmed: 29871645
World J Surg. 2015 Sep;39(9):2115-25
pubmed: 26239773
Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(2):e138-e150
pubmed: 30570764
JAMA. 2015 Dec 1;314(21):2263-70
pubmed: 26624825
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12):
pubmed: 33355267
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 15;19(1):948
pubmed: 31307419
Br J Surg. 2016 Oct;103(11):1453-61
pubmed: 27428044
Lancet. 2015 Aug 8;386(9993):569-624
pubmed: 25924834
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 08;10(9):e0137315
pubmed: 26348921
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0150080
pubmed: 26910462
Reprod Health. 2015 Jun 21;12:57
pubmed: 26093498
World J Surg. 2017 Jun;41(6):1401-1413
pubmed: 28105528
Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(1):110
pubmed: 28587676
Surgery. 2021 Jul;170(1):126-133
pubmed: 33785194
Lancet. 2011 Apr 23;377(9775):1393-6
pubmed: 21520507
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Sep 4;16(1):166
pubmed: 28870228