Spectral inference reveals principal cone-integration rules of the zebrafish inner retina.


Journal

Current biology : CB
ISSN: 1879-0445
Titre abrégé: Curr Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9107782

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 12 2021
Historique:
received: 09 08 2021
revised: 09 09 2021
accepted: 17 09 2021
pubmed: 16 10 2021
medline: 9 4 2022
entrez: 15 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Retinal bipolar cells integrate cone signals at dendritic and axonal sites. The axonal route, involving amacrine cells, remains largely uncharted. However, because cone types differ in their spectral sensitivities, insights into bipolar cells' cone integration might be gained based on their spectral tunings. We therefore recorded in vivo responses of bipolar cell presynaptic terminals in larval zebrafish to widefield but spectrally resolved flashes of light and mapped the results onto spectral responses of the four cones. This "spectral circuit mapping" allowed explaining ∼95% of the spectral and temporal variance of bipolar cell responses in a simple linear model, thereby revealing several notable integration rules of the inner retina. Bipolar cells were dominated by red-cone inputs, often alongside equal sign inputs from blue and green cones. In contrast, UV-cone inputs were uncorrelated with those of the remaining cones. This led to a new axis of spectral opponency where red-, green-, and blue-cone "Off" circuits connect to "natively-On" UV-cone circuits in the outermost fraction of the inner plexiform layer-much as how key color opponent circuits are established in mammals. Beyond this, and despite substantial temporal diversity that was not present in the cones, bipolar cell spectral tunings were surprisingly simple. They either approximately resembled both opponent and non-opponent spectral motifs already present in the cones or exhibited a stereotyped non-opponent broadband response. In this way, bipolar cells not only preserved the efficient spectral representations in the cones but also diversified them to set up a total of six dominant spectral motifs, which included three axes of spectral opponency.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34653362
pii: S0960-9822(21)01287-2
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.047
pmc: PMC8669161
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5214-5226.e4

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 220277/Z20/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/R014817/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Références

J Vis. 2019 May 1;19(5):14
pubmed: 31100130
J Physiol. 2000 Apr 1;524 Pt 1:135-46
pubmed: 10747188
J Neurosci. 2011 Apr 27;31(17):6504-17
pubmed: 21525291
Vis Neurosci. 2008 May-Jun;25(3):307-15
pubmed: 18598402
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007 Nov;26(6):636-48
pubmed: 17851105
J Comp Neurol. 2004 Sep 27;477(4):371-85
pubmed: 15329887
Elife. 2016 Nov 25;5:
pubmed: 27885985
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Nov;104(5):2407-22
pubmed: 20610786
Nat Neurosci. 2012 May 27;15(7):954-6
pubmed: 22634731
Front Cell Neurosci. 2018 Oct 03;12:327
pubmed: 30337857
Nature. 2010 Oct 7;467(7316):673-7
pubmed: 20930838
Curr Biol. 2021 Mar 8;31(5):R235-R236
pubmed: 33689717
Vis Neurosci. 2014 Mar;31(2):165-75
pubmed: 24759445
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003 Aug;13(4):421-7
pubmed: 12965288
Curr Biol. 2021 Jun 21;31(12):R807-R820
pubmed: 34157269
Neuron. 2006 Jun 1;50(5):735-48
pubmed: 16731512
J Comp Neurol. 2017 May 1;525(7):1532-1557
pubmed: 27570913
Eye (Lond). 2017 Feb;31(2):286-300
pubmed: 27935605
Sci Adv. 2021 Oct 15;7(42):eabj6815
pubmed: 34644120
BMC Biol. 2020 Nov 27;18(1):172
pubmed: 33243249
Dev Dyn. 2007 Nov;236(11):3088-99
pubmed: 17937395
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 25;6:32012
pubmed: 27558155
Neuron. 2020 Jul 22;107(2):320-337.e6
pubmed: 32473094
J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 29;34(5):1760-8
pubmed: 24478358
PeerJ. 2014 Jun 19;2:e453
pubmed: 25024921
J Neurosci. 2010 Jan 13;30(2):568-72
pubmed: 20071519
Clin Exp Optom. 2004 Jul;87(4-5):206-16
pubmed: 15312024
Nature. 1994 Feb 24;367(6465):731-5
pubmed: 8107868
Curr Biol. 2021 Dec 6;31(23):5214-5226.e4
pubmed: 34653362
Curr Biol. 2020 Aug 3;30(15):2927-2942.e7
pubmed: 32531283
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Oct 6;37:441-468
pubmed: 34351785
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Oct;106:106-115
pubmed: 32295724
Curr Biol. 2014 Sep 22;24(18):2085-2096
pubmed: 25155513
Curr Biol. 2013 Jan 7;23(1):48-52
pubmed: 23246403
Neuron. 2016 Apr 20;90(2):308-19
pubmed: 27068790
Cell. 2019 Feb 21;176(5):1222-1237.e22
pubmed: 30712875
J Comp Neurol. 1999 Oct 25;413(3):417-28
pubmed: 10502249
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Dec 1;116(6):2799-2814
pubmed: 27707811
Cell. 2016 Aug 25;166(5):1308-1323.e30
pubmed: 27565351
Eur J Neurosci. 1998 Apr;10(4):1350-62
pubmed: 9749789
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2019 Sep 15;5:177-200
pubmed: 31226010
Nature. 2017 Feb 23;542(7642):439-444
pubmed: 28178238
J Neurosci. 1998 May 1;18(9):3373-85
pubmed: 9547245
Curr Biol. 2018 Jul 9;28(13):2018-2032.e5
pubmed: 29937350
Nat Commun. 2016 Feb 03;7:10590
pubmed: 26838932
Elife. 2020 May 28;9:
pubmed: 32463363
J Comp Neurol. 2009 Oct 10;516(5):442-53
pubmed: 19655401
Curr Biol. 2021 May 10;31(9):1945-1953.e5
pubmed: 33636122
J Neurosci. 2021 Jun 9;41(23):5015-5028
pubmed: 33893221
J Comp Neurol. 2012 Nov 1;520(16):3786-802
pubmed: 22907678
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jan 23;93(2):577-81
pubmed: 8570598
Nat Methods. 2009 Dec;6(12):883-9
pubmed: 19898484
J Physiol. 1968 Aug;197(3):567-92
pubmed: 5666170
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1993 Aug;68(3):413-71
pubmed: 8347768
Elife. 2021 Jan 04;10:
pubmed: 33393903
J Gen Physiol. 1991 Apr;97(4):819-43
pubmed: 1711573
Nat Methods. 2019 Jul;16(7):649-657
pubmed: 31209382
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 13;11(1):3481
pubmed: 32661226
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1983 Nov 22;220(1218):89-113
pubmed: 6140684
Nature. 2016 Jan 21;529(7586):345-50
pubmed: 26735013
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Aug;15(8):507-19
pubmed: 25158357
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2020 Sep 15;6:363-385
pubmed: 32580663
Neuron. 2021 Feb 17;109(4):645-662.e9
pubmed: 33357413
PLoS Biol. 2014 Oct 21;12(10):e1001972
pubmed: 25333637
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:743-75
pubmed: 10845080
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 26;12(1):1900
pubmed: 33772000
Nature. 2001 Mar 29;410(6828):583-7
pubmed: 11279496
Curr Biol. 2019 Oct 7;29(19):3277-3288.e5
pubmed: 31564498

Auteurs

Philipp Bartel (P)

School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Biology Road, BN1 9QG Brighton, UK.

Takeshi Yoshimatsu (T)

School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Biology Road, BN1 9QG Brighton, UK.

Filip K Janiak (FK)

School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Biology Road, BN1 9QG Brighton, UK.

Tom Baden (T)

School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Biology Road, BN1 9QG Brighton, UK; Institute of Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Elfriede-Aulhorn-Strasse 7, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. Electronic address: t.baden@sussex.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH