Electronically monitored occlusion therapy in amblyopia with eccentric fixation.
Amblyopia
Dose response
Eccentric fixation
Efficiency
Occlusion treatment
Journal
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
ISSN: 1435-702X
Titre abrégé: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8205248
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
received:
18
06
2021
accepted:
10
09
2021
revised:
30
08
2021
pubmed:
17
10
2021
medline:
16
4
2022
entrez:
16
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Amblyopia with eccentric fixation, especially when not diagnosed early, is a therapeutic challenge, as visual outcome is known to be poorer than in amblyopia with central fixation. Consequently, treatment after late diagnosis is often denied. Electronic monitoring of occlusion provides us the chance to gain first focussed insight into age-dependent dose response and treatment efficiency, as well as the shift of fixation in this rare group of paediatric patients. In our prospective pilot study, we examined amblyopes with eccentric fixation during 12 months of occlusion treatment. We evaluated their visual acuity, recorded patching duration using a TheraMon®-microsensor, and determined their fixation with a direct ophthalmoscope. Dose-response relationship and treatment efficiency were calculated. The study included 12 participants with strabismic and combined amblyopia aged 2.9-12.4 years (mean 6.5). Median prescription of occlusion was 7.7 h/day (range 6.6-9.9) and median daily received occlusion was 5.2 h/day (range 0.7-9.7). At study end, median acuity gain was 0.6 log units (range 0-1.6) and residual interocular visual acuity difference (IOVAD) 0.3 log units (range 0-1.8). There was neither significant acuity gain nor reduction in IOVAD after the 6th month of treatment. Children younger than 4 years showed best response with lowest residual IOVAD at study end. Efficiency calculation showed an acuity gain of approximately one line from 100 h of patching in the first 2 months and half a line after 6 months. There was a significant decline of treatment efficiency with age (p = 0.01). Foveolar fixation was achieved after median 3 months (range 1-6). Three patients (> 6 years) did not gain central fixation. Eccentric fixation is a challenge to therapy success. Based on electronic monitoring, our study quantified for the first time the reduction of treatment efficiency with increasing age in amblyopes with eccentric fixation. Despite some improvement in patients up to 8 years, older patients showed significantly lower treatment efficiency. In younger patients with good adherence, despite poor initial acuity, central fixation and low residual IOVAD could be attained after median 3 months. Hence, the necessity of early diagnosis and intensive occlusion should be emphasized.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34655332
doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05416-5
pii: 10.1007/s00417-021-05416-5
pmc: PMC9007808
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1741-1753Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Ophthalmology. 1993 Mar;100(3):323-7
pubmed: 8460000
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1962 May;38:311-22
pubmed: 14465615
Am J Ophthalmol. 1974 Jul;78(1):117-20
pubmed: 4835063
Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Aug;86(8):915-9
pubmed: 12140215
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2010 Oct;227(10):765-73
pubmed: 20963678
Br J Ophthalmol. 1968 Nov;52(11):839-42
pubmed: 5696912
J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil. 2019 Oct-Dec;69(4):136-140
pubmed: 31697193
Ophthalmology. 2006 Jun;113(6):895-903
pubmed: 16751032
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;45(9):3048-54
pubmed: 15326120
Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Jun;84(6):572-8
pubmed: 10837378
Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec;94(8):e753-e756
pubmed: 27350046
Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;91(8):e635-40
pubmed: 23759025
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct;247(10):1401-8
pubmed: 19415317
Strabismus. 2006 Jun;14(2):65-70
pubmed: 16760110
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001 Nov;21(6):461-9
pubmed: 11727874
J Vis. 2003;3(5):380-405
pubmed: 12875634
Ophthalmology. 2003 Nov;110(11):2075-87
pubmed: 14597512
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000 Jan;238(1):53-8
pubmed: 10664053
BMJ. 2007 Oct 6;335(7622):707
pubmed: 17855283
Br J Ophthalmol. 1995 Jun;79(6):585-9
pubmed: 7626576
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Sep;46(9):3152-60
pubmed: 16123414
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 Jun;243(6):539-44
pubmed: 15965674
Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Ophthalmol. 1962;164:235-72
pubmed: 14467941
Strabismus. 1999 Jun;7(2):113-23
pubmed: 10420216
Arch Ophthalmol. 1998 Apr;116(4):502-5
pubmed: 9565050
Br J Ophthalmol. 1967 Dec;51(12):804-14
pubmed: 6082565
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1978 Mar;55(3):144-50
pubmed: 677256
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1977 May;54(5):269-75
pubmed: 900245
Vision Res. 2014 Oct;103:11-9
pubmed: 25130409
Ophthalmic Res. 1982;14(2):107-12
pubmed: 7088495
Br J Ophthalmol. 1977 Dec;61(12):767-73
pubmed: 603784
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2010 Oct;227(10):774-81
pubmed: 20963679
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Apr;123(4):437-47
pubmed: 15824215
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002 Jul;22(4):296-9
pubmed: 12162480
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jun;48(6):2589-94
pubmed: 17525188
Arch Ophthalmol. 1965 Jun;73:776-81
pubmed: 14302508
Am J Ophthalmol. 1966 Jun;61(6):1416-9
pubmed: 5938309
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd Augenarztl Fortbild. 1956;129(5):579-604
pubmed: 13399119
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1997 Aug;211(2):113-7
pubmed: 9379636
Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 Nov;118(11):1535-41
pubmed: 11074810
Strabismus. 2005 Jun;13(2):93-106
pubmed: 16020365
Br J Ophthalmol. 1968 Dec;52(12):929-31
pubmed: 5700678
Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Dec;88(12):1552-6
pubmed: 15548811