Early mobilization reduces the medical care cost and the risk of disuse syndrome in patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

A retrospective observational study. To compare two conservative treatments for acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs). Several studies have reported conservative treatments for OVFs in terms of using a brace, rehabilitation, and bed rest. However, there is no consensus about the conservative treatment for OVFs. We evaluated 68 patients with acute OVF treated in our hospital from 2007 to 2011. Thirty-four patients treated in prolonged bed rest (PBR) regimen underwent rehabilitation wearing a Jewett's brace after three weeks of bed rest. In contrast, the other 34 patients underwent rehabilitation wearing a Jewett's brace as soon as possible, which we called a stir-up (SU) regimen. We compared two treatment groups for medical costs, hospital length of stay (LOS), pain according to the numeric rating scale (NRS), the activities of daily living (ADL), and imaging studies. The average hospital LOS was significantly shorter in patients treated by the SU regimen, which resulted in the medical costs reduction. There was no significant difference in the NRS through 6 months between the two groups. Although many patients in both groups experienced at least one level reduction in ADL at 6 months after the injury, patients in the SU group tended to maintain their pre-injury ADL, which almost agrees with past reports. In terms of imaging studies, patients in the PBR group showed milder vertebral compression rate over time. Pseudoarthrosis occurred in 2 patients in the SU group, who presented with mild pain, which had little influence on their daily lives. We compared two conservative treatments for OVFs. Early rehabilitation was useful treatment for OVFs to minimize the risk for disuse syndrome, maintain pre-injury ADL status, and reduce the medical costs.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.