Evaluation of the First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) model of primary care: patient characteristics and outcomes.
First Contact Physiotherapy
General practice
Musculoskeletal
Primary care
Journal
Physiotherapy
ISSN: 1873-1465
Titre abrégé: Physiotherapy
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401223
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
27
08
2020
revised:
16
06
2021
accepted:
02
08
2021
pubmed:
18
10
2021
medline:
26
2
2022
entrez:
17
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) is a primary care model where expert musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapists undertake the first patient consultation, to enhance MSK-patient care and free-up GP capacity. The authors report the quantitative findings from the FCP National Evaluation (Phase 3) which evaluated the FCP model against success criteria. A mixed-methods 24-month service evaluation involving 40 FCP sites and 240 FCPs across England. An online platform collected patient-reported experience and outcomes following the FCP consultation and at 1, 2 and 3-months follow-up. These included the Keele STarT MSK Tool, pain intensity (0-10 NRS scale), Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ, range 0-56), and Friends-and-Family Test. Over 13 months, 2825 patients were invited by email and 24% (n=680) completed their initial questionnaire. Their mean age was 56.2 (SD 14.9), 61% were female, ethnicity was 97% white, mean pain intensity was 6.1 (SD 2.13) and mean MSK-HQ score was 33.8 (SD 9.5). At 3-months follow-up (n=370) there was a 2.8 (CI 2.5 to 3.1) mean pain intensity reduction from baseline, a mean 7.1 (6.0 to 8.2) score improvement in MSK-HQ and 64% reporting overall improvement (much better/better) since seeing the FCP. One of the six success criteria was not met; 29% of those in employment reported receiving specific work advice from the FCP (target ≥75%). Ahead of the planned scale-up of the FCP primary care model across the UK, this evaluation provides useful data on patients who access this service, their short-term clinical outcomes and whether key success criteria are being met.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34656297
pii: S0031-9406(21)00074-2
doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2021.08.002
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
199-208Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.