Virtual reconstruction of orbital floor defects using a statistical shape model.
computer-assisted surgery
orbital reconstruction
statistical shape model
trauma
Journal
Journal of anatomy
ISSN: 1469-7580
Titre abrégé: J Anat
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0137162
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2022
02 2022
Historique:
revised:
03
08
2021
received:
22
02
2021
accepted:
06
09
2021
pubmed:
19
10
2021
medline:
12
3
2022
entrez:
18
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The current standard in reconstructing defects of the orbital floor, by using the concept of mirroring, is time-consuming and ignores the natural asymmetry of the skull. By using a statistical shape model (SSM), the reconstruction can be automatized and improved in accuracy. The present study aims to show the possibilities of the virtual reconstruction of artificial defects of the orbital floor using an SSM and its potentials for clinical implementation. Based on 131 unaffected CT scans of the midface, an SSM was created which contained the shape variability of the orbital floor. Nineteen midface CT scans, that were not included in the SSM, were manually segmented to establish ground truth (control group). Then artificial defects of larger and smaller sizes were created and reconstructed using SSM (Group I) and the gold standard of mirroring (Group II). Eventually, a comparison to the surface of the manual segmentation (control group) was performed. The proposed method of reconstruction using an SSM leads to more precise reconstruction results, compared with the conventional method of mirroring. Whereas mirroring led to the reconstruction errors of 0.7 mm for small defects and 0.73 mm for large defects, reconstruction using SSM led to deviations of 0.26 mm (small defect) and, respectively, 0.34 mm (large defect). The presented approach is an effective and accurate method for reconstructing the orbital floor. In connection with modern computer-aided design and manufacturing, individual patient-specific implants could be produced according to SSM-based reconstructions and could replace current methods using manual bending techniques. By acknowledging the natural asymmetry of the human skull, the SSM-based approach achieves higher accuracy in reconstructing injured orbits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34658032
doi: 10.1111/joa.13550
pmc: PMC8742960
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
323-329Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Anatomy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Anatomical Society.
Références
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015 Feb;10(2):129-40
pubmed: 24810111
J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Jul 01;7(3):e410-3
pubmed: 26330940
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Apr;13(4):519-529
pubmed: 29080945
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale. 2015 Dec;116(6):343-9
pubmed: 26598243
Emerg Radiol. 2018 Oct;25(5):533-545
pubmed: 29922866
Injury. 2004 Oct;35(10):955-62
pubmed: 15351656
J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Jan;23(1):288-93
pubmed: 22337427
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Apr;46(4):715-721
pubmed: 29548880
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;46(9):1544-1549
pubmed: 30041991
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990 Jun;28(3):194-9
pubmed: 2135661
J Anat. 2022 Feb;240(2):323-329
pubmed: 34658032
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1995 Apr;23(2):81-90
pubmed: 7790512
Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Oct;30(5):554-60
pubmed: 25397711
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;46(9):1550-1554
pubmed: 30075904
Cochlear Implants Int. 2009;10 Suppl 1:14-8
pubmed: 19142886
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Nov;110(6):1417-29
pubmed: 12409759
Int J Med Robot. 2009 Jun;5(2):111-24
pubmed: 19291669
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Nov;70(11):e631-8
pubmed: 23078825
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Jun;65(6):1094-101
pubmed: 17517291
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 Mar;33(2):130-2
pubmed: 15314008
Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1323-41
pubmed: 22770690
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;45(4):461-466
pubmed: 28202219
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013 Sep;8(5):691-702
pubmed: 23417709
J Craniofac Surg. 2002 Nov;13(6):726-37; discussion 738
pubmed: 12457084
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Oct;43(8):1340-7
pubmed: 26211725
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2017 May - Jun;51(3):214-220
pubmed: 28343651
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jul;149(1):60-6
pubmed: 23482478
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Jun;43(5):624-9
pubmed: 25934440
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Sep;118(4):217-223
pubmed: 28642192
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Jul;47(7):1054-1059
pubmed: 30982558
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Feb;40(2):116-23
pubmed: 21458284
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Mar;101(3):604-12
pubmed: 9500377
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28
pubmed: 16545965
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Oct;104(4):e1-10
pubmed: 17656126
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;52(10):901-6
pubmed: 25218316