Changes in Brain Responses to Music and Non-music Sounds Following Creativity Training Within the "Different Hearing" Program.
auditory perception
brain plasticity
creativity
music composition
music education
music training
task-related fMRI
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
30
04
2021
accepted:
06
09
2021
entrez:
18
10
2021
pubmed:
19
10
2021
medline:
19
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The "Different Hearing" program (DHP) is an educational activity aimed at stimulating musical creativity of children and adults by group composing in the classroom, alternative to the mainstream model of music education in Czechia. Composing in the classroom in the DHP context does not use traditional musical instruments or notation, instead, the participants use their bodies, sounds originating from common objects as well as environmental sounds as the "elements" for music composition by the participants' team, with the teacher initiating and then participating and coordinating the creative process, which ends with writing down a graphical score and then performing the composition in front of an audience. The DHP methodology works with a wide definition of musical composition. We hypothesized that the DHP short-term (2 days) intense workshop would induce changes in subjective appreciation of different classes of music and sound (including typical samples of music composed in the DHP course), as well as plastic changes of the brain systems engaged in creative thinking and music perception, in their response to diverse auditory stimuli. In our study, 22 healthy university students participated in the workshop over 2 days and underwent fMRI examinations before and after the workshop, meanwhile 24 students were also scanned twice as a control group. During fMRI, each subject was listening to musical and non-musical sound samples, indicating their esthetic impression with a button press after each sample. As a result, participants' favorable feelings toward non-musical sound samples were significantly increased only in the active group. fMRI data analyzed using ANOVA with
Identifiants
pubmed: 34658759
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.703620
pmc: PMC8517178
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
703620Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Arkhipova, Hok, Valošek, Trnečková, Všetičková, Coufalová, Synek, Zouhar and Hluštík.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Oct;36(10):4104-15
pubmed: 26178653
J Clin Psychol. 1956 Jan;12(1):21-6
pubmed: 13278412
J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 28;27(9):2349-56
pubmed: 17329432
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Jul;8(7):547-58
pubmed: 17585307
Magn Reson Med. 2000 Jul;44(1):162-7
pubmed: 10893535
Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Mar;31(3):398-409
pubmed: 19722171
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jul;6(7):682-7
pubmed: 12830159
Hear Res. 2016 Mar;333:157-166
pubmed: 26828741
Cortex. 2009 Jan;45(1):62-71
pubmed: 19041965
Cortex. 2014 Feb;51:92-102
pubmed: 24188648
Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):272-80
pubmed: 22732560
J Neurosci. 2014 Apr 30;34(18):6156-63
pubmed: 24790186
Neuroimage. 2008 Jun;41(2):535-43
pubmed: 18420426
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 15;105:440-51
pubmed: 25463452
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 30;12(10):e0187254
pubmed: 29084283
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 14;8:1179
pubmed: 28769835
Neuroimage. 2006 Apr 1;30(2):512-20
pubmed: 16289998
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 11;6:1195
pubmed: 26322002
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Jul;26(7):3125-34
pubmed: 26139842
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Sep;36(9):3351-72
pubmed: 26015271
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 11;112(32):10062-7
pubmed: 26195739
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jul;104(1):322-35
pubmed: 20463201
Med Image Anal. 2001 Jun;5(2):143-56
pubmed: 11516708
Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1732-47
pubmed: 15050594
Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;129:187-205
pubmed: 25726270
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 May;19(5):893-906
pubmed: 17488212
Sci Data. 2014 May 27;1:140003
pubmed: 25977761
Neuroimage. 2009 May 15;46(1):39-46
pubmed: 19457380
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):782-90
pubmed: 21979382
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):676-82
pubmed: 11209064
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):968-80
pubmed: 16530430
Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 17;5:10964
pubmed: 26084037
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 May;19(5):830-42
pubmed: 17488207
Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1622-38
pubmed: 15050586
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2006;9(Pt 2):58-66
pubmed: 17354756
Neuroimage. 2001 Dec;14(6):1370-86
pubmed: 11707093
Am Psychol. 1950 Sep;5(9):444-54
pubmed: 14771441
Neuroimage. 2002 Oct;17(2):825-41
pubmed: 12377157
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Feb;25(2):313-28
pubmed: 23163413
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491
Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):1052-63
pubmed: 14568475
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Oct;37(10):3375-87
pubmed: 27159407
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Dec;22(12):2921-9
pubmed: 22235031
Neuroimage. 2015 May 15;112:267-277
pubmed: 25770991
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 18;6:20482
pubmed: 26888383
Neuroimage. 2017 Mar 1;148:189-196
pubmed: 28082106
Neuroimage. 2011 Mar 15;55(2):681-7
pubmed: 21111830
PLoS One. 2008 Feb 27;3(2):e1679
pubmed: 18301756
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 19;9(2):e88665
pubmed: 24586366
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Feb;20(2):226-39
pubmed: 18275331
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:1-38
pubmed: 18400922
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Sep;118(Pt A):40-58
pubmed: 29555561
Front Neurosci. 2021 Mar 10;15:630829
pubmed: 33776638
Brain Cogn. 2018 Dec;128:1-6
pubmed: 30393122
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;829:293-303
pubmed: 25358716
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 30;115(5):1087-1092
pubmed: 29339474