Exploring Peoples' Perception of Autonomy and Reactance in Everyday AI Interactions.

artificial intelligence autonomy explainability human-centered AI reactance

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 21 05 2021
accepted: 27 08 2021
entrez: 18 10 2021
pubmed: 19 10 2021
medline: 19 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Applications using Artificial Intelligence (AI) have become commonplace and embedded in our daily lives. Much of our communication has transitioned from human-human interaction to human-technology or technology-mediated interaction. As technology is handed over control and streamlines choices and decision-making in different contexts, people are increasingly concerned about a potential threat to their autonomy. In this paper, we explore autonomy perception when interacting with AI-based applications in everyday contexts using a design fiction-based survey with 328 participants. We probed if providing users with explanations on "why" an application made certain choices or decisions influenced their perception of autonomy or reactance regarding the interaction with the applications. We also looked at changes in perception when users are aware of AI's presence in an application. In the social media context, we found that people perceived a greater reactance and lower sense of autonomy perhaps owing to the personal and identity-sensitive nature of the application context. Providing explanations on "why" in the navigation context, contributed to enhancing their autonomy perception, and reducing reactance since it influenced the users' subsequent actions based on the recommendation. We discuss our findings and the implications it has for the future development of everyday AI applications that respect human autonomy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34659025
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713074
pmc: PMC8511481
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

713074

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Sankaran, Zhang, Aarts and Markopoulos.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Ergonomics. 2018 Oct;61(10):1409-1427
pubmed: 29578376
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Feb;80(2):325-39
pubmed: 11220449
Z Psychol. 2015;223(4):205-214
pubmed: 27453805
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):2985-3016
pubmed: 32705538
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Feb;144(1):114-26
pubmed: 25401381
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867

Auteurs

Supraja Sankaran (S)

Department of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

Chao Zhang (C)

Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Henk Aarts (H)

Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Panos Markopoulos (P)

Department of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH