Stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of short- and mid-term results.

Total shoulder arthroplasty complication reverse shoulder arthroplasty stemless

Journal

Shoulder & elbow
ISSN: 1758-5732
Titre abrégé: Shoulder Elbow
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101506589

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Historique:
received: 08 12 2020
revised: 03 03 2021
accepted: 08 04 2021
entrez: 18 10 2021
pubmed: 19 10 2021
medline: 19 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is used to treat rotator cuff deficient arthropathies, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteoarthritis. It has several advantages over the stemmed implant including preservation of bone stock, reduced surgical time, and easier revision. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and CENTRAL to retrieve all relevant studies evaluating stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The literature search identified 1993 studies out of which 7 studies were included in this review; 324 patients underwent stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with a weighted mean age of 74.1 (SD = 8.6, range = 38 to 93) years and a weighted mean follow-up time of 44 (SD = 6.6, range = 3 to 95) months. The included studies reported significant improvements in range of motion and functional scores comparable to stemmed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The weight mean flexion and abduction was (135 ± 12)° and (131 ± 12)° post-operatively, respectively. The weighted mean constant score increased from (26.7 ± 5.2) Patients (pts) to (63.0 ± 8.0) pts post-operatively. Overall complication and revision rate were 12.3% and 5.2%. Early and mid-term results indicate stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has similar clinical outcomes to stemmed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. There was no radiological evidence of humeral loosening at the latest follow-up.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34659481
doi: 10.1177/17585732211013356
pii: 10.1177_17585732211013356
pmc: PMC8512978
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

482-491

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Références

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Jan;30(1):89-96
pubmed: 31432259
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
pubmed: 19622552
Int Orthop. 2014 May;38(5):1001-6
pubmed: 24458592
JSES Open Access. 2019 Sep 16;3(3):154-161
pubmed: 31709355
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Sep;29(9):1928-1937
pubmed: 32220527
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Sep;22(9):e1-6
pubmed: 23419604
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Feb;27(2):298-305
pubmed: 29162305
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Aug;25(8):1362-70
pubmed: 26923308
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jan;24(1):45-51
pubmed: 25027480
Int Orthop. 2014 Jun;38(6):1213-8
pubmed: 24705690
ANZ J Surg. 2003 Sep;73(9):712-6
pubmed: 12956787
Acta Biomed. 2019 Jan 10;90(1-S):47-53
pubmed: 30714998
Int Orthop. 2016 Oct;40(10):2115-2120
pubmed: 27438011
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jan;20(1):146-57
pubmed: 21134666
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120

Auteurs

Eva Y Liu (EY)

Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Dorsa Kord (D)

Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Nicholas J Yee (NJ)

Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Nolan S Horner (NS)

Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Latifah Al Mana (L)

Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Timothy Leroux (T)

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Bashar Alolabi (B)

Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Moin Khan (M)

Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Classifications MeSH