MR-Linac Radiotherapy - The Beam Angle Selection Problem.
MR-linac
automated planning
beam angle class solution
beam angle optimization (BAO)
rectal cancer
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
31
05
2021
accepted:
09
09
2021
entrez:
18
10
2021
pubmed:
19
10
2021
medline:
19
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
With the large-scale introduction of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), selection of optimal beam angles for coplanar static-beam IMRT has increasingly become obsolete. Due to unavailability of VMAT in current MR-linacs, the problem has re-gained importance. An application for automated IMRT treatment planning with integrated, patient-specific computer-optimization of beam angles (BAO) was used to systematically investigate computer-aided generation of beam angle class solutions (CS) for replacement of computationally expensive patient-specific BAO. Rectal cancer was used as a model case. 23 patients treated at a Unity MR-linac were included. BAO For x>7, plan quality for CS Computer-generated beam angle CS could replace individualized BAO without loss in plan quality, while reducing planning complexity and calculation times, and resulting in a simpler clinical workflow. CS and BAO largely outperformed equi-angular treatment. With the developed CS, time consuming beam angle re-optimization in daily adaptive MR-linac treatment could be avoided. Further systematic research on computerized development of beam angle class solutions for MR-linac treatment planning is warranted.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
With the large-scale introduction of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), selection of optimal beam angles for coplanar static-beam IMRT has increasingly become obsolete. Due to unavailability of VMAT in current MR-linacs, the problem has re-gained importance. An application for automated IMRT treatment planning with integrated, patient-specific computer-optimization of beam angles (BAO) was used to systematically investigate computer-aided generation of beam angle class solutions (CS) for replacement of computationally expensive patient-specific BAO. Rectal cancer was used as a model case.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
23 patients treated at a Unity MR-linac were included. BAO
RESULTS
RESULTS
For x>7, plan quality for CS
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Computer-generated beam angle CS could replace individualized BAO without loss in plan quality, while reducing planning complexity and calculation times, and resulting in a simpler clinical workflow. CS and BAO largely outperformed equi-angular treatment. With the developed CS, time consuming beam angle re-optimization in daily adaptive MR-linac treatment could be avoided. Further systematic research on computerized development of beam angle class solutions for MR-linac treatment planning is warranted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34660281
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.717681
pmc: PMC8518312
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
717681Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Bijman, Rossi, Janssen, de Ruiter, van Triest, Breedveld, Sonke and Heijmen.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
NKI is a member of the Elekta MR-Linac consortium. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Nov 1;66(3):913-22
pubmed: 17011464
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Feb 1;91(2):401-9
pubmed: 25482301
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jul;24(3):207-9
pubmed: 24931095
Phys Med Biol. 2001 Sep;46(9):2467-76
pubmed: 11580182
Med Phys. 2012 Feb;39(2):951-63
pubmed: 22320804
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Oct 7;60(19):7485-97
pubmed: 26371425
Front Oncol. 2021 Apr 15;11:619929
pubmed: 33937025
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 Apr 24;10:19-24
pubmed: 33458263
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Dec;153:67-78
pubmed: 32976873
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun 20;28(18):2996-3001
pubmed: 20479390
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Sep 7;57(17):5441-58
pubmed: 22864234
Comput Math Methods Med. 2018 Jun 3;2018:4571801
pubmed: 29971132
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jul 1;86(3):407-13
pubmed: 23523322
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Aug;128(2):343-348
pubmed: 29970259
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Apr;111(1):138-43
pubmed: 24630537
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Apr 1;88(5):1175-9
pubmed: 24529714
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Aug;92(2):202-9
pubmed: 19454365
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Feb 1;82(2):809-16
pubmed: 21277694
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jun 01;2(3):485-493
pubmed: 29114617
Med Phys. 2019 Nov;46(11):5144-5151
pubmed: 31529694
Phys Med Biol. 2004 May 21;49(10):1915-32
pubmed: 15214533
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S101-7
pubmed: 20171503
Radiother Oncol. 2019 May;134:50-54
pubmed: 31005224
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jul;24(3):196-9
pubmed: 24931092
Acta Oncol. 2020 Aug;59(8):926-932
pubmed: 32436450
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jun 13;14(1):105
pubmed: 31196120
Br J Radiol. 2018 Dec;91(1092):20180270
pubmed: 30074813
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jul 21;7:1-8
pubmed: 33458398
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Dec;125(3):439-444
pubmed: 28811038