A Fully Automatic Artificial Intelligence System Able to Detect and Characterize Prostate Cancer Using Multiparametric MRI: Multicenter and Multi-Scanner Validation.

aggressiveness score artificial intelligence automatic segmentation external validation magnetic resonance imaging prostate cancer

Journal

Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 31 05 2021
accepted: 03 09 2021
entrez: 18 10 2021
pubmed: 19 10 2021
medline: 19 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In the last years, the widespread use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood examination to triage patients who will enter the diagnostic/therapeutic path for prostate cancer (PCa) has almost halved PCa-specific mortality. As a counterpart, millions of men with clinically insignificant cancer not destined to cause death are treated, with no beneficial impact on overall survival. Therefore, there is a compelling need to develop tools that can help in stratifying patients according to their risk, to support physicians in the selection of the most appropriate treatment option for each individual patient. The aim of this study was to develop and validate on multivendor data a fully automated computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system to detect and characterize PCas according to their aggressiveness. We propose a CAD system based on artificial intelligence algorithms that a) registers all images coming from different MRI sequences, b) provides candidates suspicious to be tumor, and c) provides an aggressiveness score of each candidate based on the results of a support vector machine classifier fed with radiomics features. The dataset was composed of 131 patients (149 tumors) from two different institutions that were divided in a training set, a narrow validation set, and an external validation set. The algorithm reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in distinguishing between low and high aggressive tumors of 0.96 and 0.81 on the training and validation sets, respectively. Moreover, when the output of the classifier was divided into three classes of risk, i.e., indolent, indeterminate, and aggressive, our method did not classify any aggressive tumor as indolent, meaning that, according to our score, all aggressive tumors would undergo treatment or further investigations. Our CAD performance is superior to that of previous studies and overcomes some of their limitations, such as the need to perform manual segmentation of the tumor or the fact that analysis is limited to single-center datasets. The results of this study are promising and could pave the way to a prediction tool for personalized decision making in patients harboring PCa.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34660282
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.718155
pmc: PMC8517452
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

718155

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Giannini, Mazzetti, Defeudis, Stranieri, Calandri, Bollito, Bosco, Porpiglia, Manfredi, De Pascale, Veltri, Russo and Regge.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):614
pubmed: 30679599
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):41-9
pubmed: 26361169
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Aug;24(37):1-176
pubmed: 32773013
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;103:356-387
pubmed: 30100160
Eur Urol. 2015 Dec;68(6):1045-53
pubmed: 25656808
Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):764-765
pubmed: 28040356
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913
pubmed: 29801017
Am J Surg Pathol. 2005 Sep;29(9):1228-42
pubmed: 16096414
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jul;27(7):3050-3059
pubmed: 27975146
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Mar;69(2):127-157
pubmed: 30720861
Urol Oncol. 2015 Aug;33(8):337.e15-24
pubmed: 26048104
BJU Int. 2016 Jul;118(1):84-94
pubmed: 26198404
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):282-288
pubmed: 27574821
Eur Radiol. 2014 Aug;24(8):1929-41
pubmed: 24865693
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Apr;206(4):775-82
pubmed: 27003049
Pathologica. 2001 Jun;93(3):226-32
pubmed: 11433618
Phys Med Biol. 2018 May 01;63(9):095004
pubmed: 29570456
Eur Urol. 2014 Jun;65(6):1046-55
pubmed: 24439788
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0178524
pubmed: 28934225
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822
pubmed: 28110982
Radiology. 2020 May;295(2):328-338
pubmed: 32154773
Radiology. 2018 Oct;289(1):128-137
pubmed: 30063191
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jan;44(1):151-165
pubmed: 27271051
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Aug;20(8):155-163
pubmed: 31222919
Nat Rev Urol. 2019 Jul;16(7):391-403
pubmed: 31092914
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Jul 7;61(13):R150-66
pubmed: 27269645
Radiology. 2011 Jun;259(3):775-84
pubmed: 21436085
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Mar;49(3):875-884
pubmed: 30230108
Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351
pubmed: 30898406
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):753-60
pubmed: 23464824
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33
pubmed: 33433946
Eur Radiol. 2015 Oct;25(10):2840-50
pubmed: 25991476
Clin Radiol. 2019 Nov;74(11):876-885
pubmed: 30573283
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Apr 7;60(7):2685-701
pubmed: 25768265
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1557-1563
pubmed: 32294352
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):60-7
pubmed: 26182305
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52
pubmed: 26492179
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 7;9(1):1570
pubmed: 30733585
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Feb;72(1):49-57
pubmed: 31833725
Radiother Oncol. 2001 Jul;60(1):49-59
pubmed: 11410304
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262
pubmed: 33172724
Eur Radiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):4200-4208
pubmed: 28386721
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Mar;41(3):708-14
pubmed: 24616064
Cancer. 1993 Feb 1;71(3 Suppl):933-8
pubmed: 7679045
Urology. 2008 Jul;72(1):177-82
pubmed: 18279938
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 8;14(7):e0217702
pubmed: 31283771
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2015 Dec;46 Pt 2:219-26
pubmed: 26391055
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Jun 21;57(12):3833-51
pubmed: 22640958
J Urol. 2017 Feb;197(2S):S134-S139
pubmed: 28012760
Front Oncol. 2018 Dec 18;8:630
pubmed: 30619764
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jun;115:16-21
pubmed: 31084754

Auteurs

Valentina Giannini (V)

Department of Radiology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Simone Mazzetti (S)

Department of Radiology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Arianna Defeudis (A)

Department of Radiology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Giuseppe Stranieri (G)

Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria (AOU) San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy.

Marco Calandri (M)

Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria (AOU) San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy.
Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Enrico Bollito (E)

Department of Pathology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy.

Martino Bosco (M)

Department of Pathology, San Lazzaro Hospital, Alba, Italy.

Francesco Porpiglia (F)

Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy.

Matteo Manfredi (M)

Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy.

Agostino De Pascale (A)

Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria (AOU) San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy.

Andrea Veltri (A)

Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria (AOU) San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy.
Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Filippo Russo (F)

Department of Radiology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.

Daniele Regge (D)

Department of Radiology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Classifications MeSH