Retrospective Comparative Analysis of KRAS G12C
G12C
KRAS
chemotherapy
first line
mCRC
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
04
07
2021
accepted:
09
09
2021
entrez:
18
10
2021
pubmed:
19
10
2021
medline:
19
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) define a subset of tumors that have primary resistance to anti-EGFR-based therapy. Data concerning whether different KRAS mutations may also have a prognostic value are lacking. Furthermore, novel KRAS G12C inhibitors are currently in development. The aim of our analysis was to compare response rates in patients treated with first-line chemotherapy doublet + Bevacizumab among different KRAS variants. Secondary end-points were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients with KRAS mutated mCRC treated with either FOLFIRI/FOLFOX/XELOX + Bevacizumab were eligible for enrollment. Patients whose tumor harbored NRAS mutations or that coexpressed also BRAF mutations were excluded from this retrospective analysis. Patients' individual data were collected from patients' records. Propensity score matching (nearest method, 1:2 ratio) was used to define the two different groups of patients for comparison (KRAS G12C mutated A total of 120 patients were assessed in the final analysis. Out of the 120 patients, 15 (12%) were KRAS G12C mutated. In the whole cohort of patients, 59/120 (49%) had partial response (PR), 42/120 (35%) had stable disease (SD), and 19/120 (16%) had progressive disease (PD) as the best response. In KRAS G12C patients, 4/15 (27%) had PR, 6/15 (40%) had SD, and the remaining 5/15 (33%) had PD as the best response. In patients with other KRAS mutations, 55/105 (52%) had PR, 37/105 (35%) had SD, and the remaining 13/105 (12%) had PD as the best response. The difference in RR between the two groups of patients was statistically significant (p=0.017). On the other hand, no difference in PFS (p=0.76) and OS (p=0.56) was observed. After matching procedures, the difference in response rates between KRAS G12C mutated patients In our cohort of patients, it was observed that KRAS G12C mutations are associated with worse response rates compared to other KRAS variants when treated with standard chemotherapy doublet + Bevacizumab. On the other hand, both PFS and OS were not significantly different. Based on these findings, we believe that new treatment options focused on KRAS G12C inhibition should be tested mainly in first-line setting and in addition to standard chemotherapy doublet + Bevacizumab for mCRC patients, as they might "fill the gap" in response rates that was seen in our study.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) define a subset of tumors that have primary resistance to anti-EGFR-based therapy. Data concerning whether different KRAS mutations may also have a prognostic value are lacking. Furthermore, novel KRAS G12C inhibitors are currently in development. The aim of our analysis was to compare response rates in patients treated with first-line chemotherapy doublet + Bevacizumab among different KRAS variants. Secondary end-points were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
METHODS
METHODS
Patients with KRAS mutated mCRC treated with either FOLFIRI/FOLFOX/XELOX + Bevacizumab were eligible for enrollment. Patients whose tumor harbored NRAS mutations or that coexpressed also BRAF mutations were excluded from this retrospective analysis. Patients' individual data were collected from patients' records. Propensity score matching (nearest method, 1:2 ratio) was used to define the two different groups of patients for comparison (KRAS G12C mutated
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 120 patients were assessed in the final analysis. Out of the 120 patients, 15 (12%) were KRAS G12C mutated. In the whole cohort of patients, 59/120 (49%) had partial response (PR), 42/120 (35%) had stable disease (SD), and 19/120 (16%) had progressive disease (PD) as the best response. In KRAS G12C patients, 4/15 (27%) had PR, 6/15 (40%) had SD, and the remaining 5/15 (33%) had PD as the best response. In patients with other KRAS mutations, 55/105 (52%) had PR, 37/105 (35%) had SD, and the remaining 13/105 (12%) had PD as the best response. The difference in RR between the two groups of patients was statistically significant (p=0.017). On the other hand, no difference in PFS (p=0.76) and OS (p=0.56) was observed. After matching procedures, the difference in response rates between KRAS G12C mutated patients
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In our cohort of patients, it was observed that KRAS G12C mutations are associated with worse response rates compared to other KRAS variants when treated with standard chemotherapy doublet + Bevacizumab. On the other hand, both PFS and OS were not significantly different. Based on these findings, we believe that new treatment options focused on KRAS G12C inhibition should be tested mainly in first-line setting and in addition to standard chemotherapy doublet + Bevacizumab for mCRC patients, as they might "fill the gap" in response rates that was seen in our study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34660299
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.736104
pmc: PMC8514824
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
736104Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Giampieri, Lupi, Ziranu, Bittoni, Pretta, Pecci, Persano, Giglio, Copparoni, Crocetti, Mandolesi, Faa, Coni, Scartozzi and Berardi.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 1;33(7):692-700
pubmed: 25605843
Stat Med. 2019 Feb 28;38(5):751-777
pubmed: 30347461
Korean J Intern Med. 2017 May;32(3):514-522
pubmed: 28407465
BMC Cancer. 2016 May 31;16:339
pubmed: 27246726
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1306-15
pubmed: 26338525
Br J Cancer. 2001 Sep 1;85(5):692-6
pubmed: 11531254
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Jun;137(6):820-7
pubmed: 23030695
Ann Oncol. 2012 Jul;23(7):1706-12
pubmed: 22112971
J Transl Med. 2015 May 07;13:140
pubmed: 25943333
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 10;30(29):3570-7
pubmed: 22734028
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1626-34
pubmed: 18316791
Ann Oncol. 2014 Jul;25(7):1346-1355
pubmed: 24718886
Front Genet. 2012 Jan 03;2:100
pubmed: 22303394
Metabolomics. 2020 Apr 16;16(4):51
pubmed: 32300895
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013 Nov;88(2):272-83
pubmed: 23806981
Cancer Treat Rev. 2020 Mar;84:101974
pubmed: 32014824
J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Oct;9(10):1513-22
pubmed: 25170638
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 1;34(19):2258-64
pubmed: 27114605
JAMA. 2010 Oct 27;304(16):1812-20
pubmed: 20978259
Oncologist. 2021 Oct;26(10):845-853
pubmed: 34232546
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 13;9(1):11730
pubmed: 31409810