Adolescents Have Twice the Revision Rate of Young Adults After ACL Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Study From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry.
ACL
adolescent
anterior cruciate ligament
epiphyses
pediatric
registry
revision
Journal
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
22
04
2021
accepted:
25
05
2021
entrez:
18
10
2021
pubmed:
19
10
2021
medline:
19
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Previous studies have identified young age as a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision. However, few studies have looked separately at pediatric patients and adolescents with regard to outcomes after ACL reconstruction. To determine whether patient age at ACL reconstruction affects the risk of undergoing revision surgery in young patients. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. This study was based on data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry. Patients aged 5 to 35 years who underwent a primary ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2015, were included. The cohort was stratified into different age groups of pediatric patients, adolescents, and young adults to estimate patients with open, recently closed, and closed epiphyses, respectively. The primary endpoint was ACL revision. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to assess the ACL revision rate. The results were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. A total of 36,274 ACL reconstructions were registered during the study period. Of these, 2848 patients were included in the study: 47 pediatric patients (mean age, 13.6 years; range, 9-15 years), 522 adolescents (mean age, 17.4; range, 14-19 years), and 2279 young adults (mean age, 27.0; range, 20-35 years). A total of 31 patients (1.1%) underwent ACL revision within 2 years (0 pediatric patients, 9 adolescents [1.7%], and 22 young adults [1.0%]) and a total of 53 patients (2.6%) underwent ACL revision within 5 years (2 pediatric patients [6.9%], 15 adolescents [3.9%], and 36 young adults [2.2%]). The adolescent age group had a 1.91 times higher rate of ACL revision compared with the young adults (HR = 1.91 [95% CI, 1.13-3.21]; Adolescents had almost twice the rate of revision ACL reconstruction compared with young adults.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Previous studies have identified young age as a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision. However, few studies have looked separately at pediatric patients and adolescents with regard to outcomes after ACL reconstruction.
PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether patient age at ACL reconstruction affects the risk of undergoing revision surgery in young patients.
STUDY DESIGN
METHODS
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS
METHODS
This study was based on data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry. Patients aged 5 to 35 years who underwent a primary ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2015, were included. The cohort was stratified into different age groups of pediatric patients, adolescents, and young adults to estimate patients with open, recently closed, and closed epiphyses, respectively. The primary endpoint was ACL revision. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to assess the ACL revision rate. The results were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 36,274 ACL reconstructions were registered during the study period. Of these, 2848 patients were included in the study: 47 pediatric patients (mean age, 13.6 years; range, 9-15 years), 522 adolescents (mean age, 17.4; range, 14-19 years), and 2279 young adults (mean age, 27.0; range, 20-35 years). A total of 31 patients (1.1%) underwent ACL revision within 2 years (0 pediatric patients, 9 adolescents [1.7%], and 22 young adults [1.0%]) and a total of 53 patients (2.6%) underwent ACL revision within 5 years (2 pediatric patients [6.9%], 15 adolescents [3.9%], and 36 young adults [2.2%]). The adolescent age group had a 1.91 times higher rate of ACL revision compared with the young adults (HR = 1.91 [95% CI, 1.13-3.21];
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Adolescents had almost twice the rate of revision ACL reconstruction compared with young adults.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34660824
doi: 10.1177/23259671211038893
pii: 10.1177_23259671211038893
pmc: PMC8516395
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
23259671211038893Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: B.T. received a research grant from the Gothenburg Medical Society. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). The AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Références
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jun 7;99(11):897-904
pubmed: 28590374
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):121-7
pubmed: 25325560
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):628-639
pubmed: 30645948
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Feb;22(2):379-86
pubmed: 24318509
Orthop Clin North Am. 2016 Oct;47(4):777-88
pubmed: 27637664
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Apr 25;5(4):2325967117703399
pubmed: 28473996
Acta Orthop. 2009 Oct;80(5):563-7
pubmed: 19916690
Sports Med. 2017 Feb;47(2):221-232
pubmed: 27402457
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;43(12):2974-81
pubmed: 26498959
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Sep;54(18):1099-1102
pubmed: 32046955
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Dec 10;7(12):2325967119888888
pubmed: 31840033
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Aug;27(8):2450-2459
pubmed: 30374568
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2230-5
pubmed: 22962296
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jun;47(7):1550-1556
pubmed: 31084492
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):331-6
pubmed: 26637284
Bone Joint J. 2020 Feb;102-B(2):239-245
pubmed: 32009437
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 May;25(5):1542-1554
pubmed: 27995286
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;44(7):1861-76
pubmed: 26772611
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1583-90
pubmed: 25899429
J Pediatr Orthop. 2016 Jul-Aug;36(5):447-52
pubmed: 25985368
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Mar 6;95(5):e28
pubmed: 23467876
J Pediatr Orthop. 2017 Apr/May;37(3):204-209
pubmed: 26192883
Sports Med. 2017 Aug;47(8):1487-1500
pubmed: 28078610
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Mar;24(3):792-5
pubmed: 26860290
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1976 Nov;58-B(4):426-35
pubmed: 1018028
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):641-7
pubmed: 24451111
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Apr 20;5(4):2325967117700599
pubmed: 28451617
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1567-73
pubmed: 24753238
Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Sep 27;4(9):2325967116666039
pubmed: 27734019
Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Oct 08;2(10):2325967114552405
pubmed: 26535272
Arthroscopy. 2019 Jan;35(1):158-162
pubmed: 30611344
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Apr;26(4):1011-1018
pubmed: 29188332
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(9):2092-2097
pubmed: 28460194
Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Apr 28;4(4):2325967116644241
pubmed: 27169132
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jan;54(1):33-37
pubmed: 31399428
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):298-309
pubmed: 31917613
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Dec;25(12):3938-3944
pubmed: 28299389
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Mar;27(3):905-911
pubmed: 30353211