Resilience of health systems in conflict affected governorates of Iraq, 2014-2018.
Conflict
ISIS
Iraq
Primary Health Care
Journal
Conflict and health
ISSN: 1752-1505
Titre abrégé: Confl Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101286573
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Oct 2021
18 Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
14
01
2021
accepted:
05
10
2021
entrez:
19
10
2021
pubmed:
20
10
2021
medline:
20
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The objective of this study was to assess the resilience of health systems in four governorates affected by conflict from 2014 to 2018, and to convey recommendations. Health managers from Al Anbar, Ninawa, Salah al-Din, and Kirkuk governorates discussed resilience factors of Primary Health Care services affected by the 2014-2017 ISIS insurgency in focus groups, and general discussions. Additional information was gathered from key informants and a UNICEF health facility survey. Three specific aspects were examined: (1) meeting health needs in the immediate crisis response, (2) adaptation of services, (3) restructuring and recovery measures. Data from a MoH/UNICEF national health facility survey in 2017 were analyzed for functionality. There were many common themes across the four governorates, with local variations. (1) Absorption The shock to the public sector health services by the ISIS invasion caught health services in the four governorates unprepared, with limited abilities to continue to provide services. Private pharmacies and private clinics in some places withstood the initial shock better than the public sector. (2) Adaptation After the initial shock, many health facilities adapted by focusing on urgent needs for injury and communicable disease care. In most locations, maternal, neonatal, and child health (MNCH) preventive and promotive PHC services stopped. Ill persons would sometimes consult health workers in their houses at night for security reasons. (3) Restructuring or transformative activities In most areas, health services recovery was continuing in 2020. Some heavily damaged facilities are still functioning, but below pre-crisis level. Rebuilding lost community trust in the public sector is proving difficult. Health services generally had little preparation for and limited resilience to the ISIS influx. Governorates are still restructuring services after the liberation from ISIS in 2017. Disaster planning was identified by all participants as a missing component, as everyone anticipated future similar emergencies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34663395
doi: 10.1186/s13031-021-00412-2
pii: 10.1186/s13031-021-00412-2
pmc: PMC8521490
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
76Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Apr 1;35(3):313-322
pubmed: 31876921
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 22;11:229
pubmed: 21936958
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Oct;27(7):541-54
pubmed: 22279082
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):84
pubmed: 28095824
Lancet. 2015 May 9;385(9980):1910-2
pubmed: 25987159
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Feb 1;35(1):26-35
pubmed: 31625558
Glob Public Health. 2019 Oct;14(10):1414-1427
pubmed: 31034779
Lancet. 2013 Mar 16;381(9870):939-48
pubmed: 23499042
Med Confl Surviv. 2019 Sep;35(3):209-226
pubmed: 31597450
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jan;220:22-30
pubmed: 30390471
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Apr 04;6(8):431-435
pubmed: 28812842
Confl Health. 2015 Oct 05;9:30
pubmed: 26442129
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2019 Aug;13(4):758-766
pubmed: 30919800