Salvage lymph node dissection for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)-identified oligometastatic disease.
Journal
Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
ISSN: 1911-6470
Titre abrégé: Can Urol Assoc J
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101312644
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
entrez:
19
10
2021
pubmed:
20
10
2021
medline:
20
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The availability of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging, particularly in the setting of rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after definitive treatment, has led to oligometastatic prostate cancer being increasingly identified. Despite the enthusiasm surrounding treating oligometastatic disease, it has been relatively understudied. We sought to review our salvage lymphadenectomy experience in the PSMA PET/CT era. We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing lymphadenectomy following curative-intent primary therapy with rising PSA who had undergone a PSMA PET/CT identifying oligometastatic disease (defined as ≤5 PSMA-avid lesions) between January 2016 and April 2020. The primary endpoint was complete response, defined as achieving a PSA <0.2 ng/ml without concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Twenty-two patients were included. Primary curative therapy included radical prostatectomy (86.4%) and brachytherapy (13.6%). Median PSA at salvage surgery was 1.72 ng/ml. Pelvic lymph node dissection was the most performed procedure (72.7%). Median node yield was 10.5, with a median of 1.5 positive nodes on pathology. Eight patients (36.4%) achieved PSA <0.2, with six (27.3%) remaining with PSA <0.2 after a median followup of 23.1 months. Nine (40.9%) had an initial PSA decline, but nadired ≥0.2, and in five (22.7%) the PSA rose immediately after surgery. Overall, ADT was started in seven patients (31.8%) at a median of 10.1 months post-salvage surgery. In our series of salvage dissection for PSMA-PET-detected nodal oligometastases, approximately a third achieved PSA <0.2; yet, it was only durable in 27%. Prospective trials of salvage nodal radiation are ongoing, however, more prospective trials of salvage node dissection are needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34665714
pii: cuaj.6988
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6988
pmc: PMC8525523
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
E545-E552Références
Investig Clin Urol. 2018 Jan;59(1):18-24
pubmed: 29333510
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):852-63
pubmed: 25240974
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Apr;14(4):130-138
pubmed: 32254013
BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5):673-681
pubmed: 28548372
Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):432-438
pubmed: 27600589
Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Dec;13(12):420-426
pubmed: 31364976
Eur Urol. 2019 Oct;76(4):493-504
pubmed: 30391078
Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;27(2):138-145
pubmed: 29937163
Eur Urol. 2011 Nov;60(5):935-43
pubmed: 21840116
Eur Urol. 2011 Jun;59(6):893-9
pubmed: 21388736
Mol Imaging Biol. 2015 Aug;17(4):575-84
pubmed: 26013479
Curr Opin Oncol. 2016 May;28(3):216-21
pubmed: 26967720
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 10;36(5):446-453
pubmed: 29240541
J Urol. 2011 Mar;185(3):869-75
pubmed: 21239008
Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):826-833
pubmed: 30503072
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):630-642
pubmed: 27591931
Clin Radiol. 2019 Nov;74(11):865-875
pubmed: 31176447
Urol Oncol. 2019 Nov;37(11):812.e17-812.e24
pubmed: 31327750
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Mar;23(1):1-10
pubmed: 31147628
BMC Urol. 2016 Sep 06;16(1):56
pubmed: 27601051
Eur Urol. 2015 Feb;67(2):299-309
pubmed: 24571959
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Feb;42(2):197-209
pubmed: 25411132
BJU Int. 2017 Jul;120(1):40-47
pubmed: 27862863
Urol Int. 2018;100(3):251-262
pubmed: 29161715
BJU Int. 2017 Dec;120(6):815-821
pubmed: 28646594
Nat Rev Urol. 2017 Jan;14(1):15-25
pubmed: 27725639
J Urol. 2012 Dec;188(6):2190-7
pubmed: 23083862
Curr Opin Urol. 2016 Nov;26(6):581-9
pubmed: 27584024
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424
pubmed: 27626136
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Feb;14(2):17-23
pubmed: 31999544
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun;8(6):378-82
pubmed: 21423255
Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Oct;13(10):307-314
pubmed: 31603409
J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):111-6
pubmed: 25150640
Curr Opin Urol. 2018 Mar;28(2):191-196
pubmed: 29028767
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629
pubmed: 27568654
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 1;21(11):2163-72
pubmed: 12775742
Can Urol Assoc J. 2009 Jun;3(3 Suppl 2):S92-S100
pubmed: 19543427
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:198543
pubmed: 25695051
J Urol. 2015 Feb;193(2):484-90
pubmed: 25180792
Oncotarget. 2017 Sep 21;8(48):84180-84192
pubmed: 29137414
Eur Urol Focus. 2016 Dec;2(5):522-531
pubmed: 28723518