Analysis of urinary organic acids by gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for metabolic profiling applications.
Biomarker
Derivatization
Gas chromatography
Metabolic profiling
Tandem mass spectrometry
Urine
Validation
Journal
Journal of chromatography. A
ISSN: 1873-3778
Titre abrégé: J Chromatogr A
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9318488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Nov 2021
22 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
31
07
2021
revised:
14
09
2021
accepted:
27
09
2021
pubmed:
20
10
2021
medline:
25
11
2021
entrez:
19
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A sensitive, accurate and precise method was developed for the quantification of a large number of organic acids in human urine by GC-MS/MS. The analytes were selected based on their role as key metabolic intermediates; intermediates of Krebs cycle, fatty acid oxidation, glycolysis, down-stream metabolites of neurotransmitter synthesis and degradation, metabolites indicative of nutritional deficiencies, byproducts of microbial activity in the gastrointestinal tract (GI) etc. The most efficient sample preparation protocol was selected based on tests for extraction with different solvents such as MTBE and ethyl acetate under acidic conditions, whereas finally a more general protocol was applied with methanol. Regarding derivatization, methoxyamine with MSTFA, 1% TMCS was applied. The method was extensively validated, including stability study, ensuring accurate determination of the studied organic acids in human urine. Proof of its utility was exhibited in a set of samples from human volunteers. The method can find wide applicability in the context of metabolomics for clinical or nutritional studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34666271
pii: S0021-9673(21)00714-7
doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462590
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
462590Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.