A pragmatic approach to risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension using the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Biomarkers
/ blood
Cardiology
Europe
/ epidemiology
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incidence
Middle Aged
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
/ blood
Oxygen Saturation
/ physiology
Prognosis
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
/ blood
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
/ methods
Risk Factors
Societies, Medical
Time Factors
Young Adult
hypertension
pulmonary
pulmonary arterial hypertension
risk factors
Journal
Open heart
ISSN: 2053-3624
Titre abrégé: Open Heart
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101631219
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2021
10 2021
Historique:
received:
18
05
2021
accepted:
07
09
2021
entrez:
20
10
2021
pubmed:
21
10
2021
medline:
1
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To optimise treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines recommend using risk stratification, with the aim of patients achieving low-risk status. Previous analyses of registries made progress in using risk stratification approaches, however, the focus is often on patients with a low-risk prognosis, whereas most PAH patients are in intermediate-risk or high-risk categories. Using only six parameters with high prognostic relevance, we aimed to demonstrate a pragmatic approach to individual patient risk assessment to discriminate between patients at low risk, intermediate risk and high risk of death. Risk assessment was performed combining six parameters in four criteria: (1) WHO functional class, (2) 6 min walk distance, (3) N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)/BNP plasma levels or right atrial pressure and (4) cardiac index or mixed venous oxygen saturation. Assessments were made at baseline and at first follow-up after 3-4 months. 725 PAH treatment-naive patients were analysed. Survival estimates between risk groups were statistically significant at baseline and first follow-up (p<0.001), even when the analysis was performed within PAH etiological subgroups. Similar results were observed in 208 previously treated PAH patients. Furthermore, patients who remained at or improved to low risk had a significantly better estimated survival compared with patients who remained at or worsened to intermediate risk or high risk (p≤0.005). The simplified risk-assessment method can discriminate idiopathic, connective-tissue-disease-associated and congenital-heart-disease-associated PAH patients into meaningful high-risk, intermediate-risk and low-risk groups at baseline and first follow-up. This pragmatic approach reinforces targeting a low-risk profile for PAH patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34667092
pii: openhrt-2021-001725
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001725
pmc: PMC8527122
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
114471-18-0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: FD, EZ, DG, ADL, IM, MR, EN, AB and GVLR have nothing to disclose. AM has received grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Actelion Pharmaceuticals. MP has received grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Actelion Pharmaceuticals. NG has received grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, GSK, MSD and Pfizer.
Références
Chest. 1991 Jun;99(6):1403-9
pubmed: 1828020
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 24;62(25 Suppl):D51-9
pubmed: 24355642
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 1;37(1):67-119
pubmed: 26320113
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Mar;34(3):356-61
pubmed: 25447572
Eur Heart J. 2018 Dec 14;39(47):4175-4181
pubmed: 28575277
Diseases. 2018 May 01;6(2):
pubmed: 29723983
Eur Respir J. 2017 Aug 3;50(2):
pubmed: 28775047
Eur Respir J. 2018 Mar 29;51(3):
pubmed: 29599117
Eur Respir J. 2009 Dec;34(6):1219-63
pubmed: 19749199
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Apr;4(4):291-305
pubmed: 26935844
Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2):354-362
pubmed: 21680644
Circulation. 2010 Jul 13;122(2):156-63
pubmed: 20585011
Chest. 2018 Jul;154(1):126-135
pubmed: 29355551
Eur Heart J. 2010 Sep;31(17):2080-6
pubmed: 20504865
Chest. 2019 Aug;156(2):323-337
pubmed: 30772387
Eur Heart J. 2017 Apr 14;38(15):1147-1155
pubmed: 28329315
Eur Respir J. 2017 Aug 3;50(2):
pubmed: 28775050
Eur Heart J. 2009 Oct;30(20):2493-537
pubmed: 19713419
Eur Respir J. 2015 Aug;46(2):414-21
pubmed: 26022952
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 28;13(3):e0193226
pubmed: 29590122
Circulation. 2010 Jul 13;122(2):164-72
pubmed: 20585012
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Eur Heart J. 2004 Dec;25(24):2243-78
pubmed: 15589643