Dementia Early-Stage Cognitive Aids New Trial (DESCANT) of memory aids and guidance for people with dementia: randomised controlled trial.


Journal

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry
ISSN: 1468-330X
Titre abrégé: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985191R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2022
Historique:
received: 08 04 2021
accepted: 04 10 2021
pubmed: 21 10 2021
medline: 17 8 2022
entrez: 20 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Common memory aids for people with dementia at home are recommended. However, rigorous evaluation is lacking, particularly what guidance or support is valued. To investigate effects of memory aids and guidance by dementia support practitioners (DSPs) for people in early-stage dementia through a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Of 469 people with mild-to-moderate dementia and their informal carers, 468 were randomised to a DSP with memory aids or to usual care plus existing dementia guide. Allocation was stratified by Trust/Health Board; time since first attendance at memory service; gender; age; and living with primary carer or not. Primary outcome was Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale (BADLS) Score at 3 and 6 months (primary end-point). Secondary outcomes for people with dementia: quality of life (CASP-19; DEMQOL); cognition and functioning (Clinical Dementia Rating Scale; S-MMSE); capability (ICECAP-O); social networks (LSNS-R); and instrumental daily living activities (R-IDDD). Secondary outcomes for carers: psychological health (GHQ-12); sense of competence (SSCQ). DSPs were successfully trained, compliance was good and welcomed by participants. Mean 6 months BADLS Score increased to 14.6 (SD: 10.4) in intervention and 12.6 (SD: 8.1) in comparator, indicative of greater dependence in the activities of daily living. Adjusted between-group difference was 0.38 (95% CI: -0.89 to 1.65, p=0.56). Though this suggests greater dependency in the intervention group the difference was not significant. No differences were found in secondary outcomes. This intervention did not maintain independence in the activities of daily living with no improvement in other outcomes for people with dementia or carers. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12591717.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Common memory aids for people with dementia at home are recommended. However, rigorous evaluation is lacking, particularly what guidance or support is valued.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate effects of memory aids and guidance by dementia support practitioners (DSPs) for people in early-stage dementia through a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.
METHODS
Of 469 people with mild-to-moderate dementia and their informal carers, 468 were randomised to a DSP with memory aids or to usual care plus existing dementia guide. Allocation was stratified by Trust/Health Board; time since first attendance at memory service; gender; age; and living with primary carer or not. Primary outcome was Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale (BADLS) Score at 3 and 6 months (primary end-point). Secondary outcomes for people with dementia: quality of life (CASP-19; DEMQOL); cognition and functioning (Clinical Dementia Rating Scale; S-MMSE); capability (ICECAP-O); social networks (LSNS-R); and instrumental daily living activities (R-IDDD). Secondary outcomes for carers: psychological health (GHQ-12); sense of competence (SSCQ).
RESULTS
DSPs were successfully trained, compliance was good and welcomed by participants. Mean 6 months BADLS Score increased to 14.6 (SD: 10.4) in intervention and 12.6 (SD: 8.1) in comparator, indicative of greater dependence in the activities of daily living. Adjusted between-group difference was 0.38 (95% CI: -0.89 to 1.65, p=0.56). Though this suggests greater dependency in the intervention group the difference was not significant. No differences were found in secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
This intervention did not maintain independence in the activities of daily living with no improvement in other outcomes for people with dementia or carers.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12591717.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34667103
pii: jnnp-2021-326748
doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326748
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1001-1009

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Paul Clarkson (P)

Social Care and Society, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK paul.clarkson@manchester.ac.uk.

Rosa Pitts (R)

Social Care and Society, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Saiful Islam (S)

Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

Julie Peconi (J)

Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

Ian Russell (I)

Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

Greg Fegan (G)

Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

Rebecca Beresford (R)

Social Care and Society, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Charlotte Entwistle (C)

Social Care and Society, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Vincent Gillan (V)

Social Care and Society, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Martin Orrell (M)

Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

David Challis (D)

Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Helen Chester (H)

Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Jane Hughes (J)

Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Narinder Kapur (N)

Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

Brenda Roe (B)

Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.

Baber Malik (B)

Social Care and Society, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Catherine Robinson (C)

Social Care and Society, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH