Body mass index and subfertility: multivariable regression and Mendelian randomization analyses in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study.
BMI
Mendelian randomization
MoBa
multivariable regression
subfertility
Journal
Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1460-2350
Titre abrégé: Hum Reprod
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8701199
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 11 2021
18 11 2021
Historique:
received:
22
06
2021
revised:
10
09
2021
pubmed:
21
10
2021
medline:
3
3
2022
entrez:
20
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
What is the association between BMI and subfertility? We observed a J-shaped relationship between BMI and subfertility in both sexes, when using both a standard multivariable regression and Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. High BMI in both women and men is associated with subfertility in observational studies and this relationship is further substantiated by a few small randomized controlled trials of weight reduction and success of assisted reproduction. Women with low BMI also have lower conception rates with assisted reproduction technologies. Cohort study (the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study), 28 341 women and 26 252 men, recruited from all over Norway between 1999 and 2008. Women (average age 30, average BMI 23.1 kg/m2) and men (average age 33, average BMI 25.5 kg/m2) had available genotype data and provided self-reported information on time-to-pregnancy and BMI. A total of 10% of couples were subfertile (time-to-pregnancy ≥12 months). Our findings support a J-shaped association between BMI and subfertility in both sexes using multivariable logistic regression models. Non-linear MR validated this relationship. A 1 kg/m2 greater genetically predicted BMI was linked to 18% greater odds of subfertility (95% CI 5% to 31%) in obese women (≥30.0 kg/m2) and 15% lower odds of subfertility (-24% to -2%) in women with BMI <20.0 kg/m2. A 1 kg/m2 higher genetically predicted BMI was linked to 26% greater odds of subfertility (8-48%) among obese men. Low genetically predicted BMI values were also related to greater subfertility risk in men at the lower end of the BMI distribution. A genetically predicted BMI of 23 and 25 kg/m2 was linked to the lowest subfertility risk in women and men, respectively. The main limitations of our study were that we did not know whether the subfertility was driven by the women, men or both; the exclusive consideration of individuals of northern European ancestry; and the limited amount of participants with obesity or BMI values <20.0 kg/m2. Our results support a causal effect of obesity on subfertility in women and men. Our findings also expand the current evidence by indicating that individuals with BMI values <20 kg/m2 may have an increased risk of subfertility. These results suggest that BMI values between 20 and 25 kg/m2 are optimal for a minimal risk of subfertility. The MoBa Cohort Study is supported by the Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services and the Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. This project received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No 947684). It was also partly supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme, project number 262700. Open Access funding was provided by the Folkehelseinstituttet/Norwegian Institute of Public Health. D.A.L. is a UK National Institute for Health Research Senior Investigator (NF-SI-0611-10196) and is supported by the US National Institutes of Health (R01 DK10324) and a European Research Council Advanced Grant (DevelopObese; 669545). The funders had no role in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication. D.A.L. receives (or has received in the last 10 years) research support from National and International government and charitable bodies, Roche Diagnostics and Medtronic for research unrelated to the current work. The rest of the authors declare that no competing interests exist. N/A.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34668019
pii: 6403655
doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab224
pmc: PMC8600658
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3141-3151Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NF-SI-0611-10196
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : RG/13/13/30194
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00011/6
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK10324
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00002/7
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 204623/Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : RG/18/13/33946
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : CH/12/2/29428
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
Références
Genet Epidemiol. 2016 May;40(4):304-14
pubmed: 27061298
Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Apr;36(4):459-471
pubmed: 29452915
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Feb 15;181(4):251-60
pubmed: 25632051
BMJ. 2012 Nov 06;345:e7325
pubmed: 23131671
Hum Mol Genet. 2014 Sep 15;23(R1):R89-98
pubmed: 25064373
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;209(4):349.e1-6
pubmed: 23727520
Obes Surg. 2019 Jan;29(1):334-346
pubmed: 30382463
N Engl J Med. 2016 May 19;374(20):1942-53
pubmed: 27192672
Hum Reprod Update. 2013 May-Jun;19(3):221-31
pubmed: 23242914
Fertil Steril. 2017 Apr;107(4):840-847
pubmed: 28292619
Epidemiology. 2014 Nov;25(6):877-85
pubmed: 25166881
Fertil Steril. 2020 Feb;113(2):344-353.e2
pubmed: 32106988
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;35(5):1146-50
pubmed: 16926217
Reproduction. 2005 Nov;130(5):583-97
pubmed: 16264089
Hum Reprod. 2017 Mar 1;32(3):662-668
pubmed: 28158570
Hum Mol Genet. 2018 Oct 15;27(20):3641-3649
pubmed: 30124842
Hum Reprod. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1621-1630
pubmed: 28854592
Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Sep 28;18(3):e101776
pubmed: 33257906
PLoS Med. 2020 Nov 16;17(11):e1003413
pubmed: 33196656
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 22;9(1):309
pubmed: 30670737
Obes Surg. 2020 Dec;30(12):4840-4851
pubmed: 32700180
Am J Hum Biol. 2003 Sep-Oct;15(5):620-7
pubmed: 12953173
Physiol Rev. 2016 Jul;96(3):873-909
pubmed: 27252278
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Dec 1;45(6):1866-1886
pubmed: 28108528
Gigascience. 2015 Feb 25;4:7
pubmed: 25722852
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Oct;23(4):490-9
pubmed: 21856228
BMJ. 2019 Mar 26;364:l1042
pubmed: 30957776
PLoS Genet. 2013 Oct;9(10):e1003919
pubmed: 24204319
EBioMedicine. 2019 Mar;41:85-90
pubmed: 30772304
Hum Reprod. 2008 Feb;23(2):324-8
pubmed: 18077317
Fertil Res Pract. 2015 Jul 25;1:11
pubmed: 28620516
Obes Rev. 2021 Jan;22(1):e13082
pubmed: 32705766
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;44(2):512-25
pubmed: 26050253
Stat Med. 2011 May 20;30(11):1312-23
pubmed: 21432888
Hum Reprod. 2020 Dec 1;35(12):2755-2762
pubmed: 33083823
Stat Med. 2008 Apr 15;27(8):1133-63
pubmed: 17886233
Nat Genet. 2018 Aug;50(8):1112-1121
pubmed: 30038396
Hum Reprod. 2007 Jun;22(6):1634-7
pubmed: 17344224
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 May 28;11:288
pubmed: 20509871
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;45(2):382-8
pubmed: 27063603
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Nov 26;4:186
pubmed: 32760811
Hum Mol Genet. 2021 Feb 4;29(23):3845-3858
pubmed: 33291140
Hum Reprod Update. 2021 Oct 18;27(6):1030-1055
pubmed: 34387675
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018 Mar 9;16(1):22
pubmed: 29523133
Genet Epidemiol. 2017 May;41(4):341-352
pubmed: 28317167
Fertil Steril. 2018 Sep;110(4):581-586
pubmed: 30196941
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Feb 4;98(2):392-3
pubmed: 26849114
Epidemiology. 2006 Sep;17(5):520-3
pubmed: 16837825
Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 1;10(1):4448
pubmed: 31575865
Am J Hum Genet. 2015 Jun 4;96(6):926-37
pubmed: 26027497
Science. 2013 Jun 21;340(6139):1467-71
pubmed: 23722424
Nat Protoc. 2020 Sep;15(9):2759-2772
pubmed: 32709988
Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Nov 1;23(6):681-705
pubmed: 28961722
Fertil Steril. 2017 Feb;107(2):422-429.e2
pubmed: 27887711
Nat Genet. 2019 Feb;51(2):237-244
pubmed: 30643251
Hum Mol Genet. 2018 Aug 1;27(R2):R195-R208
pubmed: 29771313
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Nov;31(5):593-604
pubmed: 26380863