Double jeopardy from the COVID-19 pandemic: risk of exposure and income loss in Portugal.
COVID-19 pandemic
Mental health
Socioeconomic disparities
Vulnerable populations
Journal
International journal for equity in health
ISSN: 1475-9276
Titre abrégé: Int J Equity Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147692
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 10 2021
20 10 2021
Historique:
received:
29
06
2021
accepted:
08
10
2021
entrez:
21
10
2021
pubmed:
22
10
2021
medline:
28
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Increasing evidence indicates that the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had immediate health and social impact, disproportionately affecting certain socioeconomic groups. Assessing inequalities in risk of exposure and in adversities faced during the pandemic is critical to inform targeted actions that effectively prevent disproportionate spread and reduce social and health inequities. This study examines i) the socioeconomic and mental health characteristics of individuals working in the workplace, thus at increased risk of COVID-19 exposure, and ii) individual income losses resulting from the pandemic across socioeconomic subgroups of a working population, during the first confinement in Portugal. This study uses data from 'COVID-19 Barometer: Social Opinion', a community-based online survey in Portugal. The sample for analysis comprised n = 129,078 workers. Logistic regressions were performed to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of factors associated with working in the workplace during the confinement period and with having lost income due to the pandemic. Over a third of the participants reported working in the workplace during the first confinement. This was more likely among those with lower income [AOR = 2.93 (2.64-3.25)], lower education [AOR = 3.17 (3.04-3.30)] and working as employee [AOR = 1.09 (1.04-1.15)]. Working in the workplace was positively associated with frequent feelings of agitation, anxiety or sadness [AOR = 1.14 (1.09-1.20)] and perception of high risk of infection [AOR = 11.06 (10.53-11.61)]. About 43% of the respondents reported having lost income due to the pandemic. The economic consequences affected greatly the groups at increased risk of COVID-19 exposure, namely those with lower education [AOR = 1.36 (1.19-1.56)] and lower income [AOR = 3.13 (2.47-3.96)]. The social gradient in risk of exposure and in economic impact of the pandemic can result in an accumulated vulnerability for socioeconomic deprived populations. The COVID-19 pandemic seems to have a double effect in these groups, contributing to heightened disparities and poor health outcomes, including in mental health. Protecting the most vulnerable populations is key to prevent the spread of the disease and mitigate the deepening of social and health disparities. Action is needed to develop policies and more extensive measures for reducing disproportionate experiences of adversity from the COVID-19 pandemic among most vulnerable populations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Increasing evidence indicates that the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had immediate health and social impact, disproportionately affecting certain socioeconomic groups. Assessing inequalities in risk of exposure and in adversities faced during the pandemic is critical to inform targeted actions that effectively prevent disproportionate spread and reduce social and health inequities. This study examines i) the socioeconomic and mental health characteristics of individuals working in the workplace, thus at increased risk of COVID-19 exposure, and ii) individual income losses resulting from the pandemic across socioeconomic subgroups of a working population, during the first confinement in Portugal.
METHODS
This study uses data from 'COVID-19 Barometer: Social Opinion', a community-based online survey in Portugal. The sample for analysis comprised n = 129,078 workers. Logistic regressions were performed to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of factors associated with working in the workplace during the confinement period and with having lost income due to the pandemic.
RESULTS
Over a third of the participants reported working in the workplace during the first confinement. This was more likely among those with lower income [AOR = 2.93 (2.64-3.25)], lower education [AOR = 3.17 (3.04-3.30)] and working as employee [AOR = 1.09 (1.04-1.15)]. Working in the workplace was positively associated with frequent feelings of agitation, anxiety or sadness [AOR = 1.14 (1.09-1.20)] and perception of high risk of infection [AOR = 11.06 (10.53-11.61)]. About 43% of the respondents reported having lost income due to the pandemic. The economic consequences affected greatly the groups at increased risk of COVID-19 exposure, namely those with lower education [AOR = 1.36 (1.19-1.56)] and lower income [AOR = 3.13 (2.47-3.96)].
CONCLUSIONS
The social gradient in risk of exposure and in economic impact of the pandemic can result in an accumulated vulnerability for socioeconomic deprived populations. The COVID-19 pandemic seems to have a double effect in these groups, contributing to heightened disparities and poor health outcomes, including in mental health. Protecting the most vulnerable populations is key to prevent the spread of the disease and mitigate the deepening of social and health disparities. Action is needed to develop policies and more extensive measures for reducing disproportionate experiences of adversity from the COVID-19 pandemic among most vulnerable populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34670581
doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01569-1
pii: 10.1186/s12939-021-01569-1
pmc: PMC8527282
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
231Subventions
Organisme : fundação para a ciência e a tecnologia
ID : CHRC (UIDP/04923/2020)
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471
pubmed: 32355299
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:55-64
pubmed: 32799105
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Mar 1;47(2):117-126
pubmed: 32997147
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Mar 22;9(3):
pubmed: 33810131
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2019;98(1):103-117
pubmed: 32214659
Global Health. 2014 Apr 03;10:21
pubmed: 24708831
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 31;13(8):e0203223
pubmed: 30169507
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jun;5(6):
pubmed: 32527850
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Dec;67(12):2072-8
pubmed: 18952344
Maturitas. 2013 Apr;74(4):313-33
pubmed: 23415927
Front Psychol. 2021 May 12;12:663252
pubmed: 34054667
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244809
pubmed: 33382859
Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Feb;16(2):212-8
pubmed: 20113549
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013 Mar 1;39(2):125-33
pubmed: 22949091
Lancet. 2020 Aug 15;396(10249):466
pubmed: 32798489
Occup Med (Lond). 2020 Mar 12;70(1):3-5
pubmed: 32107548
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2019686
pubmed: 32876685
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Aug;74(8):620-623
pubmed: 32385126
F1000Res. 2020 Jun 23;9:636
pubmed: 33093946
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Aug;21(8):857-61
pubmed: 16881947
Int J Public Health. 2017 Dec;62(9):997-1006
pubmed: 28421238
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;29(2):267-272
pubmed: 30307554
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jan 12;7(1):e22794
pubmed: 33433397
Ageing Res Rev. 2020 Nov;63:101149
pubmed: 32818650
JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2192-2195
pubmed: 32347898
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;20(9):1034-1042
pubmed: 32422204
BMJ. 2021 Jan 28;372:n129
pubmed: 33509801
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Sep;74(9):683-688
pubmed: 32503892
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013 Mar 1;39(2):134-43
pubmed: 22961587
Gend Work Organ. 2020 Oct 31;:
pubmed: 33230375
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2014053
pubmed: 32609353
QJM. 2020 Jun 22;:
pubmed: 32569374
J Health Commun. 2013;18 Suppl 1:172-84
pubmed: 24093354
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2021 Nov;33(4):475-480
pubmed: 34389228
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 Oct;82(1):39-45
pubmed: 18264715
Can Rev Sociol. 2020 Aug;57(3):399-452
pubmed: 32662245