Feasibility and Challenges of Performing Magnetoencephalography Experiments in Children With Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita.
arthrogryposis
child
magnetoencephalography
movement disorders
movement-evoked fields
muscle transfer
upper limbs
Journal
Frontiers in pediatrics
ISSN: 2296-2360
Titre abrégé: Front Pediatr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101615492
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
06
11
2020
accepted:
31
08
2021
entrez:
21
10
2021
pubmed:
22
10
2021
medline:
22
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) has recently drawn substantial attention from researchers and clinicians. New effective surgical and physiotherapeutic methods have been developed to improve the quality of life of patients with AMC. While it is clear that all these interventions should strongly rely on the plastic reorganization of the central nervous system, almost no studies have investigated this topic. The present study demonstrates the feasibility of using magnetoencephalography (MEG) to investigate brain activity in young AMC patients. We also outlined the general challenges and limitations of electrophysiological investigations on patients with arthrogryposis. We conducted MEG recordings using a 306-channel Elekta Neuromag VectorView system during a cued motor task performance in four patients with arthrogryposis, five normally developed children, and five control adults. Following the voice command of the experimenter, each subject was asked to bring their hand toward their mouth to imitate the self-feeding process. Two patients had latissimus dorsi transferred to the biceps brachii position, one patient had a pectoralis major transferred to the biceps brachii position, and one patient had no elbow flexion restoration surgery before the MEG investigation. Three patients who had undergone autotransplantation prior to the MEG investigation demonstrated activation in the sensorimotor area contralateral to the elbow flexion movement similar to the healthy controls. One patient who was recorded before the surgery demonstrated subjectively weak distributed bilateral activation during both left and right elbow flexion. Visual inspection of MEG data suggested that neural activity associated with motor performance was less pronounced and more widely distributed across the cortical areas of patients than of healthy control subjects. In general, our results could serve as a proof of principle in terms of the application of MEG in studies on cortical activity in patients with AMC. Reported trends might be consistent with the idea that prolonged motor deficits are associated with more difficult neuronal recruitment and the spatial heterogeneity of neuronal sources, most likely reflecting compensatory neuronal mechanisms. On the practical side, MEG could be a valuable technique for investigating the neurodynamics of patients with AMC as a function of postoperative abilitation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34671580
doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.626734
pmc: PMC8521161
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
626734Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Golosheykin, Blagoveschenskiy, Agranovich, Nazarova, Nikulin, Moiseenko, Chan and Shestakova.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jul;91 Suppl 4:40-6
pubmed: 19571066
Neuroimage. 2015 May 15;112:310-317
pubmed: 25770989
Brain Cogn. 2010 Jul;73(2):75-84
pubmed: 20418003
Brain Topogr. 2016 Nov;29(6):824-833
pubmed: 27277428
Neurosci Lett. 1991 Jan 14;122(1):17-20
pubmed: 2057131
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Sep 12;8:725
pubmed: 25309398
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):968-80
pubmed: 16530430
Neuroimage. 2001 Oct;14(4):924-35
pubmed: 11554811
Neuroimage. 2014 May 1;91:360-5
pubmed: 24440529
J Am Med Assoc. 1958 Nov 8;168(10):1306-13
pubmed: 13587210
Psychophysiology. 2000 Nov;37(6):757-65
pubmed: 11117456
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Oct;102(4):2084-95
pubmed: 19657085
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Feb 1;41(2):520-529
pubmed: 31621977
Neuroimage. 1998 May;7(4 Pt 1):377-86
pubmed: 9626677
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Sep;35(9):4858-75
pubmed: 24700413
Acta Paediatr. 2000 Jul;89(7):753-61
pubmed: 10943949
J Hand Surg Br. 2000 Feb;25(1):41-5
pubmed: 10763722
Radiology. 2006 Oct;241(1):213-22
pubmed: 16908676
J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 25;30(34):11270-7
pubmed: 20739547
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:879716
pubmed: 21584256
J Hand Surg Am. 1998 Nov;23(6):1063-70
pubmed: 9848560
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Nov;104(5):2873-85
pubmed: 20884762
Neuroimage. 2010 Jun;51(2):792-807
pubmed: 20116434
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997 Sep;44(9):867-80
pubmed: 9282479
J Pediatr Orthop. 2017 Jul/Aug;37 Suppl 1:S9-S15
pubmed: 28594687
Neuroimage Clin. 2015 Nov 07;10:46-53
pubmed: 26693401
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Nov;26(11):2004-2009
pubmed: 28689830
Neuroimage. 2008 Aug 1;42(1):332-42
pubmed: 18511304
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Oct;100(4):1800-12
pubmed: 18684903
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2019 Sep;181(3):363-371
pubmed: 31268234
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Nov 3;30(12):6405-6414
pubmed: 32705142
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 19;9(1):19464
pubmed: 31857602
Brain Topogr. 2001 Fall;14(1):15-23
pubmed: 11599529
Eur J Med Genet. 2014 Aug;57(8):464-72
pubmed: 24704792
Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Mar;27(3):213-29
pubmed: 16037985
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Apr 1;90(7):3098-102
pubmed: 8464929
Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Oct;114(10):1781-92
pubmed: 14499739
Nature. 2018 Mar 29;555(7698):657-661
pubmed: 29562238