Non-Covalent Coatings on Carbon Nanotubes Mediate Photosensitizer Interactions.
binding
donor−acceptor
dyes
hybrid
interface
metrology
substrate
Journal
ACS applied materials & interfaces
ISSN: 1944-8252
Titre abrégé: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101504991
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Nov 2021
03 Nov 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
22
10
2021
medline:
22
10
2021
entrez:
21
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Carbon nanotube-based donor-acceptor devices are used in applications ranging from photovoltaics and sensors to environmental remediation. Non-covalent contacts between donor dyes and nanotubes are often used to optimize sensitization and scalability. However, inconsistency is often observed despite donor dye studies reporting strong donor-acceptor interactions. Here, we demonstrate that the dye binding location is an important factor in this process: we used coated-acceptor chromatic responses and find that dye binding is affected by the coating layer. The emission response to free- and protein-sequestered porphyrin was tested to compare direct and indirect dye contact. An acceptor complex that preferentially red-shifts in response to sequestered porphyrin was identified. We observe inconsistent optical signals that suggest porphyrin-dye interactions are best described as coating-centric; therefore, the coating interface must be considered in application and assay design.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34672190
doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c14266
pmc: PMC9256527
mid: NIHMS1812753
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
51343-51350Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : DP2 HD075698
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM111932
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : T32 CA062948
Pays : United States
Références
Biochemistry. 2013 Jan 22;52(3):447-55
pubmed: 23249163
Chemistry. 2006 Jun 23;12(19):5053-9
pubmed: 16671050
Phys Rev Lett. 2011 Mar 4;106(9):097401
pubmed: 21405650
J Am Chem Soc. 2014 Nov 5;136(44):15545-50
pubmed: 25343218
Anal Chem. 2017 Jan 17;89(2):1073-1077
pubmed: 28194986
J Phys Chem B. 2006 Nov 23;110(46):23136-41
pubmed: 17107155
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016 Aug 24;18(34):23500-7
pubmed: 27465065
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 10;117(10):5291-5297
pubmed: 32098845
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011 Mar 1;50(10):2313-6
pubmed: 21351343
Chem Biol. 1998 Sep;5(9):505-17
pubmed: 9751647
Data Brief. 2021 Sep 14;38:107366
pubmed: 34584915
J Phys Condens Matter. 2012 Oct 3;24(39):394006
pubmed: 22964905
J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Dec 14;133(49):19922-30
pubmed: 22088093
Chem Sci. 2016 Aug 1;7(8):5192-5199
pubmed: 30155169
Biochemistry. 2011 Nov 29;50(47):10254-61
pubmed: 22004125
Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 04;5:10886
pubmed: 26041015
J Phys Chem Lett. 2017 Nov 16;8(22):5666-5672
pubmed: 29099192
Nat Biomed Eng. 2017;1:
pubmed: 28845337
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017 Jun 28;9(25):21397-21405
pubmed: 28573867
Nat Mater. 2006 Sep;5(9):683-96
pubmed: 16946728
J Am Chem Soc. 2006 Aug 30;128(34):11222-31
pubmed: 16925441
ACS Nano. 2013 Apr 23;7(4):3466-75
pubmed: 23477287
J Am Chem Soc. 2010 Jun 16;132(23):8158-64
pubmed: 20499875
J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces. 2019 Oct 3;123(39):24200-24208
pubmed: 32690989
J Am Chem Soc. 2017 Nov 22;139(46):16791-16802
pubmed: 29052988
J Phys Chem Lett. 2013 Aug 15;4(16):2664-2667
pubmed: 23991266