Dual-energy computed tomography: Survey results on current uses and barriers to further implementation.
Journal
The British journal of radiology
ISSN: 1748-880X
Titre abrégé: Br J Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
22
10
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
21
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To gauge the current availability of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) scanners in the UK, establish available technologies, look broadly at current clinical uses in adults and paediatrics, and identify barriers to implementation and potential ways to increase use. A survey was distributed amongst 10 radiology departments and shared on two national professional co-operation mail bases; the survey ran from 20th July to 9th December 2020. It explored current DECT utilisation in adults and paediatrics as well as barriers to use and suggestions to overcome those barriers. The survey demonstrated DECT availability on 39 (40%) of the 98 CT scanners, but there was limited clinical use in adults and paediatrics. Eighteen (72%) of the 25 respondents had access to at least one DECT scanner, with 14 (56%) having adult DECT protocols in clinical use; <10% head examinations and <50% for other anatomical areas. Only two (8%) respondents had DECT paediatric protocols in clinical use; <10% examinations for all anatomical areas.The main barriers to implementation identified were lack of experience with DECT (8 (44%) users (adult) and 10 (56%) users (paediatric)) and no clinical protocols available (6 (33%) users (adult and paediatric)).Understanding DECT benefits and establishing suitable protocols were the most popular suggestions for increased implementation (10 (40%) of 25 respondents). DECT scanners are available, but clinical use is limited for both adults and paediatrics. The main barriers identified were lack of experience with DECT and the availability of suitable protocols. Further work identified to help implementation included better education on the benefits of DECT, provision of clinical protocols and ensuring a multidisciplinary approach. Barriers to implementation of clinical DECT protocols were identified, together with potential solutions to overcome these and enable further implementation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34672691
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210565
pmc: PMC8631023
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20210565Références
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Mar;42(3):688-701
pubmed: 28070657
Med Phys. 2020 Jul;47(7):e881-e912
pubmed: 32215937
Radiographics. 2019 May-Jun;39(3):709-726
pubmed: 30924753
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2017 Aug;27(3):523-531
pubmed: 28711210
Radiology. 2019 May;291(2):286-297
pubmed: 30912717
Korean J Radiol. 2017 Jul-Aug;18(4):555-569
pubmed: 28670151
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Feb;176(2):289-96
pubmed: 11159059
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2017 Aug;27(3):385-400
pubmed: 28711200
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2017 Aug;27(3):371-384
pubmed: 28711199
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2019 Jul;19(7):633-644
pubmed: 31177872