Heterogeneity of treatment response in bronchiectasis clinical trials.


Journal

The European respiratory journal
ISSN: 1399-3003
Titre abrégé: Eur Respir J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8803460

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2022
Historique:
received: 20 06 2019
accepted: 15 09 2021
pubmed: 23 10 2021
medline: 10 5 2022
entrez: 22 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Recent randomised clinical trials in bronchiectasis have failed to reach their primary end-points, suggesting a need to reassess how we measure treatment response. Exacerbations, quality of life (QoL) and lung function are the most common end-points evaluated in bronchiectasis clinical trials. We aimed to determine the relationship between responses in terms of reduced exacerbations, improved symptoms and lung function in bronchiectasis. We evaluated treatment response in three randomised clinical trials that evaluated mucoactive therapy (inhaled mannitol), an oral anti-inflammatory/antibiotic (azithromycin) and an inhaled antibiotic (aztreonam). Treatment response was defined by an absence of exacerbations during follow-up, an improvement of QoL above the minimum clinically important difference and an improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV Cumulatively the three trials included 984 patients. Changes in FEV Improvements in lung function, symptoms and exacerbation frequency are dissociated in bronchiectasis. FEV

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Recent randomised clinical trials in bronchiectasis have failed to reach their primary end-points, suggesting a need to reassess how we measure treatment response. Exacerbations, quality of life (QoL) and lung function are the most common end-points evaluated in bronchiectasis clinical trials. We aimed to determine the relationship between responses in terms of reduced exacerbations, improved symptoms and lung function in bronchiectasis.
METHODS
We evaluated treatment response in three randomised clinical trials that evaluated mucoactive therapy (inhaled mannitol), an oral anti-inflammatory/antibiotic (azithromycin) and an inhaled antibiotic (aztreonam). Treatment response was defined by an absence of exacerbations during follow-up, an improvement of QoL above the minimum clinically important difference and an improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV
RESULTS
Cumulatively the three trials included 984 patients. Changes in FEV
CONCLUSIONS
Improvements in lung function, symptoms and exacerbation frequency are dissociated in bronchiectasis. FEV

Identifiants

pubmed: 34675045
pii: 13993003.00777-2021
doi: 10.1183/13993003.00777-2021
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Bacterial Agents 0
Mannitol 3OWL53L36A
Azithromycin 83905-01-5
Aztreonam G2B4VE5GH8

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L011263/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright ©The authors 2022. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest: O. Sibila has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Laserna has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Shoemark has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Perea has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Bilton has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.L. Crichton reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A. De Soyza reports grants, travel support to attend international congresses and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chiesi, Grifols, GlaxoSmithKline, Insmed, Pfizer, Novartis, Medimmune and Zambon, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: W.G. Boersma has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Altenburg has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.D. Chalmers reports grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Boehringer Ingelheim and Insmed, grants from AstraZeneca and Bayer Healthcare, personal fees from Aradigm, Pfizer and Napp, outside the submitted work.

Auteurs

Oriol Sibila (O)

Respiratory Dept, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERES, Barcelona, Spain.

Elena Laserna (E)

Hospital Comarcal de Mollet, Mollet del Vallés, Spain.

Amelia Shoemark (A)

Scottish Centre for Respiratory Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Lidia Perea (L)

Respiratory Dept, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERES, Barcelona, Spain.

Diana Bilton (D)

Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.

Megan L Crichton (ML)

Scottish Centre for Respiratory Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Anthony De Soyza (A)

Freeman Hospital Newcastle and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK.

Wim G Boersma (WG)

Dept of Pulmonary Diseases, Northwest Hospital Group, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.

Josje Altenburg (J)

Dept of Respiratory Medicine, University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

James D Chalmers (JD)

Scottish Centre for Respiratory Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK jchalmers@dundee.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH