Rather than inducing psychological reactance, requiring vaccination strengthens intentions to vaccinate in US populations.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 10 2021
Historique:
received: 09 07 2021
accepted: 30 09 2021
entrez: 22 10 2021
pubmed: 23 10 2021
medline: 16 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In a survey and three experiments (one preregistered with a nationally representative sample), we examined if vaccination requirements are likely to backfire, as commonly feared. We investigated if relative to encouraging free choice in vaccination, requiring a vaccine weakens or strengthens vaccination intentions, both in general and among individuals with a predisposition to experience psychological reactance. In the four studies, compared to free choice, requirements strengthened vaccination intentions across racial and ethnic groups, across studies, and across levels of trait psychological reactance. The results consistently suggest that fears of a backlash against vaccine mandates may be unfounded and that requirements will promote COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the United States.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34675256
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00256-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-00256-z
pmc: PMC8531364
doi:

Substances chimiques

COVID-19 Vaccines 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

20796

Subventions

Organisme : National Science Foundation
ID : NSF 2031972

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Eur J Public Health. 2016 Jun;26(3):378-81
pubmed: 26297722
Vaccine. 2018 Nov 19;36(48):7377-7384
pubmed: 30337171
Vaccine. 2013 Aug 20;31(37):3915-21
pubmed: 23845807
JAMA. 2006 Oct 11;296(14):1757-63
pubmed: 17032989
Vaccines (Basel). 2020 Dec 30;9(1):
pubmed: 33396832
Am J Public Health. 2014 Sep;104(9):e3-6
pubmed: 25033149
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Oct;40:101109
pubmed: 34522870
Public Health Ethics. 2019 Oct 22;12(3):237-249
pubmed: 32082418
Int J Behav Med. 2012 Dec;19(4):518-25
pubmed: 21879340
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 May 19;22:100352
pubmed: 32462116
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Sep;47(3):330-40
pubmed: 25145618
Health Psychol. 2018 Apr;37(4):307-315
pubmed: 29389158
Infection. 2021 Jun;49(3):387-399
pubmed: 33284427
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017 Dec;18(3):149-207
pubmed: 29611455
Vaccine. 2014 Dec 5;32(51):6986-6991
pubmed: 25454867

Auteurs

Dolores Albarracin (D)

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. dalba@upenn.edu.

Haesung Jung (H)

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

Wen Song (W)

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

Andy Tan (A)

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

Jessica Fishman (J)

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH