Mandibular Reconstruction With Fibula Flap and Dental Implants Through Virtual Surgical Planning and Three Different Techniques: Double-Barrel Flap, Implant Dynamic Navigation and CAD/CAM Mesh With Iliac Crest Graft.

3D printing (3DP) CAD/CAM titanium mesh STL models double-barrel flap iliac crest graft implant dynamic navigation mandibular reconstruction virtual surgical planning (VSP)

Journal

Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 02 06 2021
accepted: 16 09 2021
entrez: 22 10 2021
pubmed: 23 10 2021
medline: 23 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Vertical discrepancy between the fibula flap and the native mandible results in difficult prosthetic rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of 3D reconstruction of the mandible in oncologic patients using three different techniques through virtual surgical planning (VSP), cutting guides, customized titanium mesh and plates with CAD/CAM technology, STL models and intraoperative dynamic navigation for implant placement. Material and methods. Three different techniques for mandibular reconstruction and implant rehabilitation were performed in 14 oncologic patients. Five patients (36%) underwent VSP, cutting guides, STL models and a customized double-barrel titanium plate with a double-barrel flap and immediate implants. In six patients (43%), VSP, STL models and a custom-made titanium mesh (CAD/CAM) for 3D reconstruction with iliac crest graft over a fibula flap with deferred dental implants were performed. Three patients (21%) underwent VSP with cutting guides and customized titanium plates for mandibular reconstruction and implant rehabilitation using intraoperative dynamic navigation was accomplished. Vertical bone reconstruction, peri-implant bone resorption, implant success rate, effects of radiotherapy in vertical reconstruction, bone resorption and implant failure, mastication, aesthetic result and dysphagia were evaluated. Significant differences in bone growth between the double-barrel technique and iliac crest graft with titanium mesh technique were found (p<0.002). Regarding bone resorption, there were no significant differences between the techniques (p=0.11). 60 implants were placed with an osseointegration rate of 91.49%. Five implants were lost during the osseointegration period (8%). Peri-implant bone resorption was measured with a mean of 1.27 mm. There was no significant difference between the vertical gain technique used and implant survival (p>0.385). Implant survival rates were higher in non-irradiated patients (p<0.017). All patients were rehabilitated with a fixed implant-supported prosthesis reporting a regular diet (80%), normal swallowing (85.7%) and excellent aesthetic results. Multi-stage implementation of VSP, STL models and cutting guides, CAD/CAM technology, customized plates and in-house dynamic implant navigation for mandibular defects increases bone-to-bone contact, resolves vertical discrepancy and improves operative efficiency with reduced complication rates and minimal bone resorption. It provides accurate reconstruction that optimizes implant placement, thereby improving facial symmetry, aesthetics and function.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34676161
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.719712
pmc: PMC8525397
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

719712

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Antúnez-Conde, Salmerón, Díez-Montiel, Agea, Gascón, Sada, Navarro Cuéllar, Tousidonis, Ochandiano, Arenas and Navarro Cuéllar.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Oct;69(10):2663-9
pubmed: 21723018
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019 Nov;31(4):593-600
pubmed: 31481289
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Sep-Oct;28(5):e243-51
pubmed: 24066341
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 May-Jun;16(3):427-32
pubmed: 11432663
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;74(7):1503.e1-1503.e10
pubmed: 27000408
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Apr;23(2):185-95
pubmed: 12710822
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 29;10(9):
pubmed: 33946731
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 30;10(1):
pubmed: 33396707
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1998 Jun;26(3):148-52
pubmed: 9702632
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Apr;107(4):e1-8
pubmed: 19201629
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;46(9):1645-1651
pubmed: 29983306
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019 Aug;31(3):473-487
pubmed: 31133506
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Apr;72(4):572-580
pubmed: 30803870
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2000 Feb;28(1):20-4
pubmed: 10851669
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Nov;68(11):2824-32
pubmed: 20828910
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Nov;28(8):2122-2126
pubmed: 28906331
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Apr;77(4):874.e1-874.e13
pubmed: 30615849
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Sep;67(9):1171-85
pubmed: 24880575
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Sep;57(7):627-631
pubmed: 31208786
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Feb;49(2):264-271
pubmed: 31350123
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jun;74(6):1285.e1-1285.e11
pubmed: 27019415
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2003 Jan;54(1):54-64
pubmed: 12733321
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1995 Oct;23(5):217-3
pubmed: 8530700
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 Jul;65(7):893-902
pubmed: 22265963
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001 May;30(3):157-61
pubmed: 11420628
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998 Jan;56(1):38-44
pubmed: 9437980
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Apr;25(2):112-5
pubmed: 8727581
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Dec;11(6):583-94
pubmed: 11168252
Oral Oncol. 2020 Feb;101:104508
pubmed: 31864958

Auteurs

Raúl Antúnez-Conde (R)

Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

José Ignacio Salmerón (JI)

Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Alberto Díez-Montiel (A)

Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Marc Agea (M)

Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Dafne Gascón (D)

Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Ángela Sada (Á)

Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Ignacio Navarro Cuéllar (I)

Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Manuel Tousidonis (M)

Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Santiago Ochandiano (S)

Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Gema Arenas (G)

Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Carlos Navarro Cuéllar (C)

Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Classifications MeSH