Placement of sutures for inside-out meniscal repair: both sutures through meniscal tissue reduces displacement on cyclical loading.
Inside-out technique
Longitudinal tear
Meniscus
Repair
Suture
Journal
Journal of experimental orthopaedics
ISSN: 2197-1153
Titre abrégé: J Exp Orthop
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101653750
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Oct 2021
21 Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
05
08
2021
accepted:
13
10
2021
entrez:
22
10
2021
pubmed:
23
10
2021
medline:
23
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The inside-out meniscal repair is widely performed to preserve the function of meniscus. In this technique, the outer suture is passed through the capsule as well as the outer meniscus, while the inner suture is inserted into the meniscus. The aim of this study was to biomechanically compare the suture stability between meniscus-meniscus and meniscus-capsule suture methods for the longitudinal meniscal tear with inside-out technique. Twenty-seven porcine knees were dissected to maintain the femur-medial capsule/meniscus-tibia complex, and the inner meniscus was cut off along the meniscus circumferential fiber with 3 mm width of the peripheral meniscus preserved. After one needle with a 2-0 polyester suture was inserted into the inner portion of the meniscus, the other needle was inserted through 1) the peripheral meniscus (Group A), 2) capsule just above the meniscus (Group B), and 3) capsule at 10 mm apart from the meniscus-capsule junction (Group C) in the inside-out manner. Then, the suture was manually tied on the capsule. The suture gap at the repair site during 300 times of cyclic loading and the ultimate failure load in the load-to-failure test were measured. The statistical significance of the data between two groups in each combination was considered by Bonferroni correction, following a one-way analysis of variance. In the cyclic loading test, the suture gap was 0.68 ± 0.26 mm in Group A, 1.08 ± 0.36 mm in Group B, and 1.94 ± 0.57 mm in Group C with a significant difference. In the load-to-failure test, the ultimate failure load was 59.1 ± 13.6 N in Group A, 60.0 ± 7.9 N in Group B, and 57.4 ± 4.7 N in Group C, and there was no significant difference. The stitching region in the inside-out technique for longitudinal meniscal tear affected the stability of the tear site, and stitching the mid-substance region of the meniscus provides good stability in response to cyclic tensile loading. In addition, the stitching region did not affect the ultimate failure load. In the inside-out meniscal repair, the outer suture should be inserted into the remaining peripheral meniscus or the capsule near the meniscus.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34676462
doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00417-z
pii: 10.1186/s40634-021-00417-z
pmc: PMC8531164
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
94Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Jul;58(5):599-604
pubmed: 946970
Anat Embryol (Berl). 1998 Apr;197(4):317-24
pubmed: 9565324
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Mar 1;21(5):538-43
pubmed: 8852306
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Mar;77(2):245-9
pubmed: 7706339
Instr Course Lect. 1994;43:77-96
pubmed: 9097139
J Biomed Eng. 1983 Apr;5(2):157-61
pubmed: 6687914
Arthroscopy. 1996 Apr;12(2):150-5
pubmed: 8776990
Instr Course Lect. 1988;37:209-21
pubmed: 3047246
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974 Jun;56(4):719-29
pubmed: 4406907
Orthopedics. 1983 Sep 1;6(9):1130-2
pubmed: 24822794
Knee. 2006 Jun;13(3):184-8
pubmed: 16603363
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997;5(2):80-3
pubmed: 9228313
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Jun;(149):283-90
pubmed: 7408313
Arthroscopy. 2012 Dec;28(12):1873-81
pubmed: 23085200
J Orthop Traumatol. 2012 Mar;13(1):13-9
pubmed: 22190242
J Exp Orthop. 2017 Dec;4(1):2
pubmed: 28124287
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1950 May;32-B(2):244-52
pubmed: 15422026
Arthroscopy. 2009 Sep;25(9):959-67
pubmed: 19732633
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001 Jun;40(6):631-9
pubmed: 11426019
Am J Sports Med. 2010 May;38(5):965-71
pubmed: 20197493
Arthroscopy. 1985;1(3):173-4
pubmed: 3913436
Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar;31(3):428-34
pubmed: 25442653
J Sports Med. 1975 Jul-Aug;3(4):179-87
pubmed: 1219197
J Biomed Mater Res. 1995 Jul;29(7):823-8
pubmed: 7593020
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985 Jan;67(1):39-41
pubmed: 3881452
J Exp Orthop. 2017 Dec 19;4(1):41
pubmed: 29260438
Am J Sports Med. 2005 Dec;33(12):1846-52
pubmed: 16157854
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Jan;58(1):87-93
pubmed: 946171