Short-chain fatty acid administration via water acidifier improves feed efficiency and modulates fecal microbiota in weaned piglets.
growth performance
microbiota
short-chain fatty acids
water acidifier
weaned piglets
Journal
Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Nov 2021
01 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
19
07
2021
accepted:
21
10
2021
pubmed:
23
10
2021
medline:
20
11
2021
entrez:
22
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study examined the effect of a water acidifier containing free and buffered short-chain fatty acids (SCFA-WA) on growth performance and microbiota of weaned piglets. In total, 192 male piglets, approximately 4 wk of age, were allocated to 24 pens (12 per treatment) with 8 piglets per pen. The piglets received either regular drinking water (negative control) or drinking water with the acidifier supplied at 2 L/1,000 L. Body weight and feed intake were measured weekly on pen level. During the first 2 wk, daily visual assessment and scoring of the feces was conducted. Fecal samples of three piglets per pen were collected on days 14 and 42 for high-throughput sequencing analysis of the microbiota. Piglets offered SCFA-WA had significantly improved feed efficiency in the third week (P = 0.025) and over the whole study period (days 0 to 42, P = 0.042) compared with piglets in the negative control group, with a strong tendency observed during the first feeding phase (days 0 to 21, P = 0.055). Furthermore, the water acidifier group had a higher water intake than piglets provided with control water during the second feeding phase (days 21 to 42, P = 0.028) and over the whole study period (days 0 to 42, P = 0.043). There was no significant difference in body weight, average daily gain, or average daily feed intake (days 0 to 21, 21 to 42, 0 to 42). Furthermore, there was no overall significant difference in fecal scoring between the treatments. In terms of the fecal microbiota response, piglets offered the water acidifier showed a significantly higher relative abundance (RA) of genus Clostridium sensu stricto 1 and a lower RA of genus Streptococcus compared to the control. Furthermore, the redundancy analysis showed a positive association between improved feed efficiency and daily weight gain and RA of Butyricicoccus and Faecalibacterium. In conclusion, consumption of the water acidifier containing free and buffered SCFA modulated the microbiota and improved feed efficiency in piglets.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34679178
pii: 6408630
doi: 10.1093/jas/skab307
pmc: PMC8599185
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fatty Acids, Volatile
0
Water
059QF0KO0R
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.
Références
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;16(3):255-61
pubmed: 23831042
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 28;105(43):16731-6
pubmed: 18936492
Environ Pollut. 2020 Nov;266(Pt 3):115111
pubmed: 32663631
Front Physiol. 2018 Jul 24;9:980
pubmed: 30087622
J Anim Sci. 2007 Jul;85(7):1799-808
pubmed: 17296768
J Microbiol Methods. 2011 Sep;86(3):351-6
pubmed: 21704084
J Anim Sci. 2018 Apr 14;96(4):1405-1418
pubmed: 29669075
Trends Microbiol. 2017 Oct;25(10):851-873
pubmed: 28602521
Sci China Life Sci. 2019 Jul;62(7):959-970
pubmed: 30417245
ISME J. 2011 Feb;5(2):169-72
pubmed: 20827291
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jan 14;10(1):
pubmed: 31947627
PLoS One. 2009 Aug 20;4(8):e6669
pubmed: 19693277
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Sep;79(17):5112-20
pubmed: 23793624
Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 19;5:9253
pubmed: 25787310
Nutr Res Rev. 1999 Jun;12(1):117-45
pubmed: 19087448
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 24;14(4):e0215983
pubmed: 31017953
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Feb 21;6:46
pubmed: 30847348
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2018 Aug 1;315(2):G159-G170
pubmed: 29597354
Infect Genet Evol. 2016 Oct;44:376-381
pubmed: 27491454
Vet J. 2011 May;188(2):184-8
pubmed: 20471876
J Infect Dis. 2015 Jul 1;212(1):95-105
pubmed: 25525050
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6
pubmed: 23193283
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2013 Apr;97(2):207-37
pubmed: 22416941
Vet Microbiol. 2004 Oct 5;103(1-2):29-33
pubmed: 15381263
Int J Med Microbiol. 2007 Jun;297(3):133-50
pubmed: 17400023
J Nutr. 2012 Apr;142(4):661-7
pubmed: 22357743
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 7;13(8):e0201901
pubmed: 30086169
Front Microbiol. 2016 Sep 21;7:1416
pubmed: 27708624
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2015 Oct 21;6:45
pubmed: 26500769
F1000Res. 2016 Jul 22;5:1791
pubmed: 30918626
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008 Dec;66(3):546-55
pubmed: 18554303
Anaerobe. 2016 Apr;38:61-69
pubmed: 26723572
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jul 3;45(W1):W180-W188
pubmed: 28449106