Evaluating the Impact of Sex-Biased Genetic Admixture in the Americas through the Analysis of Haplotype Data.
American populations
admixture
haplotypes
human migrations
sex-biased imbalance
Journal
Genes
ISSN: 2073-4425
Titre abrégé: Genes (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101551097
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 10 2021
07 10 2021
Historique:
received:
04
08
2021
revised:
04
10
2021
accepted:
06
10
2021
entrez:
23
10
2021
pubmed:
24
10
2021
medline:
10
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A general imbalance in the proportion of disembarked males and females in the Americas has been documented during the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade and the Colonial Era and, although less prominent, more recently. This imbalance may have left a signature on the genomes of modern-day populations characterised by high levels of admixture. The analysis of the uniparental systems and the evaluation of continental proportion ratio of autosomal and X chromosomes revealed a general sex imbalance towards males for European and females for African and Indigenous American ancestries. However, the consistency and degree of this imbalance are variable, suggesting that other factors, such as cultural and social practices, may have played a role in shaping it. Moreover, very few investigations have evaluated the sex imbalance using haplotype data, containing more critical information than genotypes. Here, we analysed genome-wide data for more than 5000 admixed American individuals to assess the presence, direction and magnitude of sex-biased admixture in the Americas. For this purpose, we applied two haplotype-based approaches, ELAI and NNLS, and we compared them with a genotype-based method, ADMIXTURE. In doing so, besides a general agreement between methods, we unravelled that the post-colonial admixture dynamics show higher complexity than previously described.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34680976
pii: genes12101580
doi: 10.3390/genes12101580
pmc: PMC8535939
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Aug;67(2):444-61
pubmed: 10873790
Nat Genet. 2019 Sep;51(9):1321-1329
pubmed: 31477933
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jul 14;112(28):8696-701
pubmed: 26124090
PLoS Genet. 2014 Sep 25;10(9):e1004572
pubmed: 25254375
Curr Biol. 2019 Dec 2;29(23):3974-3986.e4
pubmed: 31735679
PLoS Genet. 2013 Nov;9(11):e1003925
pubmed: 24244192
PLoS Genet. 2015 Dec 04;11(12):e1005602
pubmed: 26636962
Hum Genet. 2003 May;112(5-6):534-41
pubmed: 12601469
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Nov;67(5):1287-95
pubmed: 11032790
Genome Res. 2009 Sep;19(9):1655-64
pubmed: 19648217
Am J Hum Genet. 2020 Aug 6;107(2):265-277
pubmed: 32707084
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 04;10(12):e0144223
pubmed: 26636572
Genetics. 2014 Mar;196(3):625-42
pubmed: 24388880
Hum Mol Genet. 2021 Apr 26;30(R1):R79-R87
pubmed: 33331897
Nature. 2016 Oct 27;538(7626):510-513
pubmed: 27698418
Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Nov 2;101(5):725-736
pubmed: 29100086
Science. 2014 Feb 14;343(6172):747-751
pubmed: 24531965
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012 May;8(5):e1002495
pubmed: 22693434
Nature. 2015 Mar 19;519(7543):309-314
pubmed: 25788095
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38337
pubmed: 22675545
Am J Hum Genet. 2015 Jan 8;96(1):37-53
pubmed: 25529636
Gigascience. 2015 Feb 25;4:7
pubmed: 25722852
Mol Biol Evol. 2020 Jun 1;37(6):1647-1656
pubmed: 32128591
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2016 Dec;41:106-114
pubmed: 27690355
Bioinformatics. 2019 Nov 1;35(21):4480-4483
pubmed: 31077292
Nat Commun. 2018 Dec 19;9(1):5388
pubmed: 30568240
Nat Commun. 2015 Mar 24;6:6596
pubmed: 25803618
Genetics. 2015 Sep;201(1):263-79
pubmed: 26209245
PLoS Genet. 2012 Jan;8(1):e1002453
pubmed: 22291602
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):68-74
pubmed: 26432245
Mol Ecol. 2020 Jun;29(12):2150-2159
pubmed: 32436243
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2017 Aug 31;18:277-296
pubmed: 28859572
PLoS Genet. 2018 May 24;14(5):e1007385
pubmed: 29795556
Genome Biol Evol. 2021 Apr 5;13(4):
pubmed: 33837782
Nat Methods. 2011 Dec 04;9(2):179-81
pubmed: 22138821