Integrating patient management, reflective practice, and ethical decision-making in an emergency medicine intern boot camp.
Clinical decision-making
Emergency medicine
Ethical reasoning
Ethics
Internship
Reflective practice
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Oct 2021
22 Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
28
01
2021
accepted:
06
10
2021
entrez:
23
10
2021
pubmed:
24
10
2021
medline:
27
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Integration of clinical skills, ethical decision-making, and reflection skills have emerged as cornerstones of clinical teaching in medical schools. This study aimed to detect whether a multimodal learning environment approach consisting of lectures, a drill, post-drill video debriefing, and written reflection in an emergency medicine rotation boot camp improves interns' patient management skills, ethical decision-making, and reflection skills. A multimodal learning environment was created by the collaboration of emergency medicine, ethics, and medical education specialists. Multiple educational techniques involving lectures, case discussions, and role-playing a crisis scenario were applied. Pre-test and post-test, debriefing on performances on video records, video-recorded performance assessment, and reflective essays about their own and group's performances were used to assess various aspects of the student performances. Additionally, a meeting was organized with the presence of the authors to create qualitative data obtained through the program evaluation meeting conducted on three themes: influences of teaching methods, students' performances, and common achievements and mistakes of students. 133 students participated. Post-test multiple-choice question (MCQ) test scores were slightly higher than pre-test. A low and medium correlation was detected among pre-test and post-test patient management problem (PMP) and reflection scores, which was more prominent for female students. Multiple linear regression showed that pre-test and post-test PMP scores significantly contributed to reflection scores. These results might support that better patient management predicts more robust reflective practice. Teachers observed that students appreciated being inspired by well-performing peers, particularly noting the empathic needs of patients, companions, and other health professionals. However, students overlooked summoning forensic or social services and were inhibited by the pressure of the contextual traits of the drill. The multimodal learning environment created by multidisciplinary collaboration contributed to the improvement of components of situational awareness of the interns: patient management skills, ethical decision-making, and reflective practice. During this research, we created a toolbox better to capture the richness and diversity of student interactions. Considering the scarcity of context-specific assessment methods and widespread use of MCQs or generic scales for higher-order thinking skills in medicine, this study might be regarded as a step forward in that context.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Integration of clinical skills, ethical decision-making, and reflection skills have emerged as cornerstones of clinical teaching in medical schools. This study aimed to detect whether a multimodal learning environment approach consisting of lectures, a drill, post-drill video debriefing, and written reflection in an emergency medicine rotation boot camp improves interns' patient management skills, ethical decision-making, and reflection skills.
METHODS
METHODS
A multimodal learning environment was created by the collaboration of emergency medicine, ethics, and medical education specialists. Multiple educational techniques involving lectures, case discussions, and role-playing a crisis scenario were applied. Pre-test and post-test, debriefing on performances on video records, video-recorded performance assessment, and reflective essays about their own and group's performances were used to assess various aspects of the student performances. Additionally, a meeting was organized with the presence of the authors to create qualitative data obtained through the program evaluation meeting conducted on three themes: influences of teaching methods, students' performances, and common achievements and mistakes of students.
RESULTS
RESULTS
133 students participated. Post-test multiple-choice question (MCQ) test scores were slightly higher than pre-test. A low and medium correlation was detected among pre-test and post-test patient management problem (PMP) and reflection scores, which was more prominent for female students. Multiple linear regression showed that pre-test and post-test PMP scores significantly contributed to reflection scores. These results might support that better patient management predicts more robust reflective practice. Teachers observed that students appreciated being inspired by well-performing peers, particularly noting the empathic needs of patients, companions, and other health professionals. However, students overlooked summoning forensic or social services and were inhibited by the pressure of the contextual traits of the drill.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The multimodal learning environment created by multidisciplinary collaboration contributed to the improvement of components of situational awareness of the interns: patient management skills, ethical decision-making, and reflective practice. During this research, we created a toolbox better to capture the richness and diversity of student interactions. Considering the scarcity of context-specific assessment methods and widespread use of MCQs or generic scales for higher-order thinking skills in medicine, this study might be regarded as a step forward in that context.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34686161
doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02970-8
pii: 10.1186/s12909-021-02970-8
pmc: PMC8532285
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
536Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Med Teach. 2011;33(3):200-5
pubmed: 20874014
J Nurs Educ. 2013 Jan;52(1):59-62
pubmed: 23244194
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 06;16(1):e3
pubmed: 24394603
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2004 Mar;17(1):62-72
pubmed: 15203475
Med Teach. 2020 Jun;42(6):636-649
pubmed: 32065016
J Med Ethics. 2008 May;34(5):399-406
pubmed: 18448726
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Jan-Feb;60(1):70-4
pubmed: 25141791
Surgery. 1999 Oct;126(4):701-5; discussion 705-7
pubmed: 10520918
Int J Med Educ. 2014 Dec 27;5:219-25
pubmed: 25543016
J Med Ethics. 2010 Sep;36(9):558-62
pubmed: 20817821
Indian J Med Ethics. 2018 Jan-Mar;3(1):9-15
pubmed: 28803221
Acad Med. 1994 May;69(5):381-6
pubmed: 8166921
Acad Med. 2006 Jul;81(7):626-31
pubmed: 16799283
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2016 May 01;9:3
pubmed: 27471586
Med Educ. 2004 Dec;38(12):1302-8
pubmed: 15566542
Med Teach. 2012;34(8):674-5
pubmed: 22830327
Med Educ. 2010 Sep;44(9):864-873
pubmed: 20716096
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 15;170(12 Suppl 2):S1-S32
pubmed: 31574150
Phys Ther. 2011 Mar;91(3):416-30
pubmed: 21273627
Acad Med. 2012 Jan;87(1):41-50
pubmed: 22104060
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):e452-8
pubmed: 22455654
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2004 Sep-Oct;25(5):226-31
pubmed: 15508561
Acad Med. 2015 Jun;90(6):744-52
pubmed: 25881647