Optical biometry and influence of media opacity due to cataract on development of axial length in NorthEast Indian paediatric patients- A prospective study.
Axial length
Congenital cataract
Genetics of ocular growth
Media opacity
Journal
BMC ophthalmology
ISSN: 1471-2415
Titre abrégé: BMC Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Oct 2021
22 Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
14
01
2021
accepted:
28
09
2021
entrez:
23
10
2021
pubmed:
24
10
2021
medline:
27
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To study the influence of media opacity due to cataract on the development of axial length in paediatric patients from North-East India, using optical biometry. This is a prospective, observational study, including consecutive patients attending the paediatric ophthalmology clinic, over a period of 1 year. Patients with other ocular and systemic diseases, unfit for optical biometry measurements due to dense cataract, nystagmus and strabismus were excluded and rest divided into three groups after proper age matching - 1. Group A (Bilateral cataract) 2. Group B (Unilateral cataract) 3. Group C (Bilateral normal). The axial length of the various groups was analysed using independent sample test (for bilateral cataract group) and paired t-test (for unilateral cataract group). Linear regression analysis between age and axial length was done. A total of 177 patients were included.80 cases in Group A (bilateral cataract), 18 cases in Group B (unilateral cataract) and 79 in Group C (bilateral normal) The mean age of the patients in all the groups was 8.88 ± 3.51 years (range: 1-17 years). The bivariate analysis and simple linear regression revealed a statistically significant correlation between age and AL in case of cataractous eyes. (Pearson's coefficient: 0.341, p < 0.001). The mean AL was significantly longer (p = 0.013) in the cataractous eyes (mean = 23.38 ± 2.08 mm) of Group A(bilateral cataract) in the 7-12 years age group as compared to the bilaterally normal eyes (mean AL = 22.57 ± 0.70 mm) of patients in the same age group in Group C. The mean AL of cataractous eyes in group B (unilateral cataract) (mean = 22.46 ± 1.73 mm) as compared to the fellow normal eyes, (mean = 21.87 ± 0.97 mm) was not statistically significant. Cataractous eyes have an abnormal axial length development. The influence of media opacity due to cataract on development of axial length in paediatric eyes in the North-East Indian population is variable, in line with global data on the same. Although there is some influence of media opacity, the exact nature is not clearly understood and may have a crucial interaction with genetic and other environmental factors. Genetic testing integrated with biometric analysis is recommended for further understanding of the ocular growth and development.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34686183
doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02138-4
pii: 10.1186/s12886-021-02138-4
pmc: PMC8539773
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
374Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981 Apr;20(4):561-4
pubmed: 7216673
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Oct;49(10):4336-9
pubmed: 18552384
Vision Res. 1994 Feb;34(3):293-301
pubmed: 8160365
Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Aug;88(8):912-9
pubmed: 21552178
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;26(1):13-7
pubmed: 23960963
Mol Vis. 2013;19:243-53
pubmed: 23401653
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994 Nov;20(6):647-51
pubmed: 7837078
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Mar 07;54(3):1715-21
pubmed: 23385790
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;65(12):1340-1349
pubmed: 29208814
Surv Ophthalmol. 1999 Oct;44 Suppl 1:S93-102
pubmed: 10548121
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994 Nov;20(6):592-8
pubmed: 7837066
Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Dec;138(6):915-24
pubmed: 15629281
Optom Vis Sci. 1994 Jun;71(6):386-91
pubmed: 8090442
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Jan;50(1):126-31
pubmed: 18757506
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Nov;49(11):4774-8
pubmed: 18502997
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Dec;46(12):4424-9
pubmed: 16303929
Neuron. 2004 Aug 19;43(4):447-68
pubmed: 15312645
Am J Hum Genet. 2013 Aug 8;93(2):264-77
pubmed: 24144296
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Nov;47(11):4756-61
pubmed: 17065484
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Oct 10;52(11):7949-53
pubmed: 21896861
Exp Eye Res. 2017 Aug;161:132-142
pubmed: 28596085
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Nov;49(11):4790-4
pubmed: 18586876
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987 Apr;28(4):750-2
pubmed: 3557880
Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;128(1):21-7
pubmed: 20065212
J Am Optom Assoc. 1995 Jul;66(7):405-14
pubmed: 7560727
Ophthalmology. 1988 Sep;95(9):1276-8
pubmed: 3062539
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;61(2):65-70
pubmed: 23412523
Am J Ophthalmol. 1981 Feb;91(2):197-200
pubmed: 7468734
Am J Ophthalmol. 1990 Feb 15;109(2):199-203
pubmed: 2301532
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct-Dec;33(4):342-346
pubmed: 31920444
Vision Res. 1987;27(7):1139-63
pubmed: 3660666
Eye (Lond). 1999;13 ( Pt 1):83-92
pubmed: 10396390
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Oct;44(10):1198-1202
pubmed: 30243394
Eye (Lond). 2016 Sep;30(9):1160-9
pubmed: 27518543
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1971;49(6):873-86
pubmed: 5172264
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Dec;51(12):6262-9
pubmed: 20592235
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Oct;48(10):4671-8
pubmed: 17898291
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2016 Feb;79(1):19-23
pubmed: 26840161
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1985 Oct;62(10):680-8
pubmed: 4073201