Preclinical safety testing and initial experience of a morcellation bag with four sealable ports.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 10 2021
22 10 2021
Historique:
received:
13
04
2021
accepted:
30
09
2021
entrez:
23
10
2021
pubmed:
24
10
2021
medline:
28
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Electromechanical morcellation-so called power morcellation-is a minimally invasive approach to remove bulky lesions such as uterine fibroids. The spread of benign and malignant tissue due to morcellation is a major concern that might limit the use of laparoscopic interventions. We present an in vitro evaluation of the safety characteristics of a four-port endobag with closable trocar sleeves, and describe physical properties of the bag that may or may not allow passage through the hole. In addition, we report our preliminary experience of this tool when used for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies. The behavior of the endobag during the extraction process was analyzed by extracting opened and re-sealed bags filled with 20 ml blue dye solution through a wooden template, with incisions measuring 10 to 24 mm. The endobag was used in 50 subtotal hysterectomies during the morcellation procedure. In the in vitro test, no dye loss was recorded for incisions measuring 11-24 mm. The mean force required to pull the bag through the template was inversely proportional to incision size. No bag rupture occurred during the surgical procedures. The mean time taken to prepare the bag for morcellation was 7.1 min (range, 4-14 min), the mean duration of subtotal hysterectomy was 53.4 min (range, 20-194 min). The mean weight of the removed body of the uterus was 113.8 g (range, 13-896 g), the mean weight of tissue and fluid remaining in the bag after morcellation 7.9 g (range, 0-39 g). In the in vitro setting, the improved endobag signifies greater patient safety during bag extraction, along with less tissue traumatization due to a smaller incision in the abdominal wall. The improved ergonomic features of the bag permit the insertion of three trocars in the lower abdomen and avoid closure of unused access ports. Our preliminary experience has shown that the device can be used under routine conditions. Failure rates will be evaluated in future studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34686761
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99934-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-99934-1
pmc: PMC8536670
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20882Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
J Endourol. 2009 Sep;23(9):1513-8
pubmed: 19694517
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016 Dec;25(6):301-313
pubmed: 27331342
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50058
pubmed: 23189178
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Sep-Oct;17(5):544-50
pubmed: 20580324
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1991 Oct;51(10):843-6
pubmed: 1837003
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Nov-Dec;22(6S):S100
pubmed: 27678558
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):486-91
pubmed: 24333632
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Mar-Apr;23(3):331-7
pubmed: 26802909
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):591.e1-8
pubmed: 25817518
Minerva Ginecol. 2017 Dec;69(6):517-525
pubmed: 28696085
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Nov - Dec;26(7):1351-1356
pubmed: 30710637
J Endourol. 2007 Oct;21(10):1183-6
pubmed: 17949322
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003 Aug;10(3):383-5
pubmed: 14567817
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Aug;130(2):195-9
pubmed: 26117552
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 May-Jun;22(4):601-6
pubmed: 25596464
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2021 Jun;30(3):154-162
pubmed: 31868557
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):313-6
pubmed: 22417903
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Feb 1;23(2):206-14
pubmed: 26454195
BJOG. 2016 Jan;123(1):69-75
pubmed: 26234998
Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Aug;122(2):255-9
pubmed: 21565389
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2010 Dec;49(12):1152-60
pubmed: 20842731
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;30(1):81-88
pubmed: 29251674
BJOG. 2009 Mar;116(4):492-500
pubmed: 19016683
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016 Aug;25(4):203-9
pubmed: 27192613
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Jan;220:30-38
pubmed: 29149644
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 May-Jun;23(4):548-56
pubmed: 26827905
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Dec;292(6):1311-20
pubmed: 26093523
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 May - Jun;25(4):632-637
pubmed: 29408695
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Feb;132(2):360-5
pubmed: 24296345
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Dec;195:122-7
pubmed: 26520875
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):494-500
pubmed: 27194256
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 10;37(35):3412-3424
pubmed: 31518176
JAMA. 2014 Mar 5;311(9):905-6
pubmed: 24504415
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):935-9
pubmed: 24928740
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):951-3
pubmed: 24769447
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;216(3):259.e1-259.e6
pubmed: 27890646
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Mar-Apr;22(3):433-8
pubmed: 25452122
JSLS. 2017 Jan-Mar;21(1):
pubmed: 28144125
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2017 Jun 1;18(2):62-66
pubmed: 28400352
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Sep 15;138(2):121-7
pubmed: 6448547
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Feb;22(2):160
pubmed: 25460317
Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Jan;116(1):131-9
pubmed: 19853898
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Sep;101:62-68
pubmed: 30025231
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;214(1):98.e1-98.e13
pubmed: 26314519