Googling for Suicide-Content and Quality Analysis of Suicide-Related Websites: Thematic Analysis.
HONcode
content analysis
eHealth
health information
internet
mental health
suicide
webpage
world wide web
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Nov 2021
11 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
28
03
2021
accepted:
01
10
2021
revised:
11
08
2021
pubmed:
25
10
2021
medline:
25
10
2021
entrez:
24
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Suicide represents a public health concern, imposing a dramatic burden. Prosuicide websites are "virtual pathways" facilitating a rise in suicidal behaviors, especially among socially isolated, susceptible individuals. The aim of this study is to characterize suicide-related webpages in the Italian language. The first 5 most commonly used search engines in Italy (ie, Bing, Virgilio, Yahoo, Google, and Libero) were mined using the term "suicidio" (Italian for suicide). For each search, the first 100 webpages were considered. Websites resulting from each search were collected and duplicates deleted so that unique webpages could be analyzed and rated with the HONcode instrument. A total of 65 webpages were included: 12.5% (8/64) were antisuicide and 6.3% (4/64) explicitly prosuicide. The majority of the included websites had a mixed or neutral attitude toward suicide (52/64, 81.2%) and had informative content and purpose (39/64, 60.9%). Most webpages targeted adolescents as an age group (38/64, 59.4%), contained a reference to other psychiatric disorders or comorbidities (42/64, 65.6%), included medical/professional supervision or guidance (45/64, 70.3%), lacked figures or pictures related to suicide (41/64, 64.1%), and did not contain any access restraint (62/64, 96.9%). The major shortcoming to this study is the small sample size of webpages analyzed and the search limited to the keyword "suicide." Specialized mental health professionals should try to improve their presence online by providing high-quality material.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Suicide represents a public health concern, imposing a dramatic burden. Prosuicide websites are "virtual pathways" facilitating a rise in suicidal behaviors, especially among socially isolated, susceptible individuals.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to characterize suicide-related webpages in the Italian language.
METHODS
METHODS
The first 5 most commonly used search engines in Italy (ie, Bing, Virgilio, Yahoo, Google, and Libero) were mined using the term "suicidio" (Italian for suicide). For each search, the first 100 webpages were considered. Websites resulting from each search were collected and duplicates deleted so that unique webpages could be analyzed and rated with the HONcode instrument.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 65 webpages were included: 12.5% (8/64) were antisuicide and 6.3% (4/64) explicitly prosuicide. The majority of the included websites had a mixed or neutral attitude toward suicide (52/64, 81.2%) and had informative content and purpose (39/64, 60.9%). Most webpages targeted adolescents as an age group (38/64, 59.4%), contained a reference to other psychiatric disorders or comorbidities (42/64, 65.6%), included medical/professional supervision or guidance (45/64, 70.3%), lacked figures or pictures related to suicide (41/64, 64.1%), and did not contain any access restraint (62/64, 96.9%). The major shortcoming to this study is the small sample size of webpages analyzed and the search limited to the keyword "suicide."
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Specialized mental health professionals should try to improve their presence online by providing high-quality material.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34689118
pii: v5i11e29146
doi: 10.2196/29146
pmc: PMC8663606
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e29146Informations de copyright
©Wen Chen, Andrea Boggero, Giovanni Del Puente, Martina Olcese, Davide Prestia, Haitham Jahrami, Nasr Chalghaf, Noomen Guelmami, Fairouz Azaiez, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 11.11.2021.
Références
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 08;21(5):e11705
pubmed: 31344675
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;211(2):109-115
pubmed: 28522433
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Dec 30;246:581-586
pubmed: 27837725
Crisis. 2015;36(3):211-9
pubmed: 26088826
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2013 Spring;24(1):44-8
pubmed: 23446539
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Oct;8(10):3938-52
pubmed: 22073021
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;75(8):886-92
pubmed: 25099284
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 02;16(17):
pubmed: 31480718
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2013 Dec 13;7:1-8
pubmed: 24376364
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;49(8):697-705
pubmed: 25698810
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;30(1):1-6
pubmed: 27845946
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2017 Feb;47(1):48-53
pubmed: 27111845
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Dec;258:506-510
pubmed: 28886904
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jan 11;15(1):e3
pubmed: 23305632
Crisis. 2018 Nov;39(6):469-478
pubmed: 29848080
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 16;12(8):e0181722
pubmed: 28813437
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Aug 12;11(8):8193-212
pubmed: 25119698
Crisis. 2014 Jan 1;35(4):261-7
pubmed: 24984890