Epineural Methylene Blue Injection May Aid Localization of Digital Nerves in Dupuytren's Surgery.
Dynamic plantar esthesiometer
In vivo nerve staining
Injury
Rat
Sciatic nerve
Journal
European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes
ISSN: 1421-9921
Titre abrégé: Eur Surg Res
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 0174752
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
04
06
2021
accepted:
11
09
2021
pubmed:
25
10
2021
medline:
8
9
2022
entrez:
24
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In Dupuytren's surgery, limited fasciectomy is still the gold-standard treatment. A relatively high risk of iatrogenic nerve injury has been observed especially when the spiral cords of the Dupuytren's tissue pull digital nerves away from their normal anatomical location. Intraoperative neural marking could facilitate locating the potentially displaced nerves. Hence, surgery could be undertaken more quickly with a lower risk of iatrogenic nerve injury. We hypothesize that digital nerves may be stained with methylene blue (MB) in vivo providing a visual aid to distinguish them from Dupuytren's tissue. We aim to (a) test an in vivo nerve staining technique using MB in a rat sciatic nerve model and to (b) assess the safety of epineural MB injection. Three experiments were performed: first, the effects of (a) sham surgery, (b) epineural needle insertion, and (c) 40 μL epineural saline injection were tested in the rat sciatic nerve. Second, we determined the (a) histoanatomical localization of the epineurally injected 40 µL 1 m/m% MB stock solution and (b) we tested which saline dilution (i.e., 1:40, 1:80, and 1:160) of the stock solution does provide optimal blue color upon 40 µL epineural injection. Third, the functional and morphological effect of 40 µL 1:80 diluted MB injection was compared with that of saline, injected into the contralateral sciatic nerve. The functional effects were tested by assessing the pain threshold by using a dynamic plantar esthesiometer (DPA) and by examination of the animal's gate and paw posture. Sciatic nerves were subjected to histological examination and morphometry to test structural damage. Neither epineural needle insertion nor saline injection caused any functional or morphological changes. Histological examination revealed that the MB stained the epineural compartment. Epineural injection of 40 μL 1:80 diluted MB into the sciatic nerve stained an 18.18-mm segment of the nerve distal to the puncture point. DPA revealed unchanged pain threshold values on the plantar surface of the limbs. Normal gait and foot posture suggested normal motor functions in all groups. No histological changes were seen in the stained nerves, and the nerve fiber density remained unchanged. We demonstrated that in vivo nerve staining with MB is a suitable method to mark nerves without causing detectable negative effect to the stained nerve. Human trials are required to prove the efficacy of the technique in Dupuytren's disease.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In Dupuytren's surgery, limited fasciectomy is still the gold-standard treatment. A relatively high risk of iatrogenic nerve injury has been observed especially when the spiral cords of the Dupuytren's tissue pull digital nerves away from their normal anatomical location. Intraoperative neural marking could facilitate locating the potentially displaced nerves. Hence, surgery could be undertaken more quickly with a lower risk of iatrogenic nerve injury.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
We hypothesize that digital nerves may be stained with methylene blue (MB) in vivo providing a visual aid to distinguish them from Dupuytren's tissue. We aim to (a) test an in vivo nerve staining technique using MB in a rat sciatic nerve model and to (b) assess the safety of epineural MB injection.
METHODS
METHODS
Three experiments were performed: first, the effects of (a) sham surgery, (b) epineural needle insertion, and (c) 40 μL epineural saline injection were tested in the rat sciatic nerve. Second, we determined the (a) histoanatomical localization of the epineurally injected 40 µL 1 m/m% MB stock solution and (b) we tested which saline dilution (i.e., 1:40, 1:80, and 1:160) of the stock solution does provide optimal blue color upon 40 µL epineural injection. Third, the functional and morphological effect of 40 µL 1:80 diluted MB injection was compared with that of saline, injected into the contralateral sciatic nerve. The functional effects were tested by assessing the pain threshold by using a dynamic plantar esthesiometer (DPA) and by examination of the animal's gate and paw posture. Sciatic nerves were subjected to histological examination and morphometry to test structural damage.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Neither epineural needle insertion nor saline injection caused any functional or morphological changes. Histological examination revealed that the MB stained the epineural compartment. Epineural injection of 40 μL 1:80 diluted MB into the sciatic nerve stained an 18.18-mm segment of the nerve distal to the puncture point. DPA revealed unchanged pain threshold values on the plantar surface of the limbs. Normal gait and foot posture suggested normal motor functions in all groups. No histological changes were seen in the stained nerves, and the nerve fiber density remained unchanged.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
We demonstrated that in vivo nerve staining with MB is a suitable method to mark nerves without causing detectable negative effect to the stained nerve. Human trials are required to prove the efficacy of the technique in Dupuytren's disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34689139
pii: 000519666
doi: 10.1159/000519666
pmc: PMC9501739
doi:
Substances chimiques
Methylene Blue
T42P99266K
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105-113Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Références
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 4;10(1):1828
pubmed: 32020043
Bone Joint J. 2018 Sep;100-B(9):1138-1145
pubmed: 30168768
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Mar;295(3):737-741
pubmed: 28084524
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 May;46(5):403-408
pubmed: 33744014
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 28;365(4):307-17
pubmed: 21732829
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Mar;79(2):206-10
pubmed: 9119843
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014 Feb;48(1):28-33
pubmed: 24428161
Hand (N Y). 2011 Sep;6(3):250-5
pubmed: 22942847
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Oct;46(10):888-895
pubmed: 34275684
PeerJ. 2019 Jan 23;7:e6376
pubmed: 30697498
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jan;89(1):189-98
pubmed: 17256226
Hand Clin. 2015 May;31(2):345-54
pubmed: 25934208
Hand Clin. 2018 Aug;34(3):387-394
pubmed: 30012298
Pain. 1990 Nov;43(2):205-218
pubmed: 1982347
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2016 Jun 30;10(6):635-42
pubmed: 27367013
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 May;50(5):1677-85
pubmed: 15146439
Pain. 2018 Sep;159(9):1856-1866
pubmed: 29794614
Eplasty. 2010 Jan 27;10:e15
pubmed: 20204055
J Hand Microsurg. 2018 Apr;10(1):54-56
pubmed: 29706740
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Oct 03;6(10):e1932
pubmed: 30534492
Postgrad Med J. 2005 Jul;81(957):425-8
pubmed: 15998816
Hand (N Y). 2017 Jan;12(1):13-20
pubmed: 28082837
Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Sep 7;101(3):417-427
pubmed: 28886342
Am J Otolaryngol. 2016 Jan-Feb;37(1):22-6
pubmed: 26700254
Front Neurosci. 2021 May 17;15:663650
pubmed: 34079436
Joint Bone Spine. 2012 Jan;79(1):7-12
pubmed: 21803632
J Vis Exp. 2012 Mar 13;(61):
pubmed: 22433911
Hand Clin. 1991 Nov;7(4):745-55; discussion 757-8
pubmed: 1769996
Biomed Pharmacother. 2018 Nov;107:1037-1045
pubmed: 30257315
Hand Clin. 1999 Feb;15(1):63-71
pubmed: 10050243
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Nov;66(5):1052-8
pubmed: 17963894