Sand accumulation in the digestive tract of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus): The role of the appendix.
Lagomorpha
Rodentia
abrasives
diet
gastrointestinal tract
sedimentation trap
Journal
Journal of morphology
ISSN: 1097-4687
Titre abrégé: J Morphol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0406125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2022
01 2022
Historique:
revised:
19
10
2021
received:
16
07
2021
accepted:
20
10
2021
pubmed:
25
10
2021
medline:
24
12
2021
entrez:
24
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We determined location and amount of accumulated sand in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) fed diets containing external (silicate) abrasives. Computed tomographic abdominal images of rabbits (n = 44) and guinea pigs (n = 16) that each received varying numbers (4-7) of different diets for 14 days each (total n = 311 computed tomographs), and radiographs of dissected GIT and presence of silica in GIT content (n = 46 animals) were evaluated. In rabbits, the majority of accumulated sand was located in the caecal appendix, an elongated, intestinal structure in the left side of the abdomen. The 'wash-back' colonic separation mechanism in rabbits may be partly responsible for a retrograde transport of sand back to the caecum, where dense, small particles accumulate in the appendix. The appendix likely acted as a reservoir of these particles, leading to significant effects not only of the momentary but also of the previous diet on recorded sand volumes in the rabbits. Guinea pigs have no caecal appendix and a colonic separation mechanism not based on a 'wash-back'. Less sand accumulation was found in their GIT without a specific location pattern, and there were less previous diet effects in this species. None of the rabbits or guinea pigs developed clinical signs of obstruction during the study, and the recorded sand volumes represented 1.0 ± 1.2% of the 14-d sand intake in rabbits and 0.2 ± 0.2% in guinea pigs. Accumulation of sand in volumes up to 10 cm
Identifiants
pubmed: 34689355
doi: 10.1002/jmor.21423
pmc: PMC9298143
doi:
Substances chimiques
Sand
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5-15Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Morphology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Equine Vet J. 2005 Jul;37(4):351-5
pubmed: 16028626
J Equine Vet Sci. 2020 Jul;90:102970
pubmed: 32534763
J Morphol. 2022 Jan;283(1):5-15
pubmed: 34689355
Cell Tissue Res. 1982;225(2):331-46
pubmed: 7105152
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 7;278(1712):1742-7
pubmed: 21068036
J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2014 Jun;321(5):283-98
pubmed: 24700486
Anat Embryol (Berl). 1978 Dec 5;155(1):57-80
pubmed: 727523
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2015 Jun;99(3):591-604
pubmed: 25041439
Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 2003 Jan;6(1):139-53
pubmed: 12616837
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2021 Nov 23;:
pubmed: 34813148
Vet Rec. 2001 Jul 7;149(1):9-11
pubmed: 11486783
Br J Exp Pathol. 1961 Apr;42:153-7
pubmed: 13785447
Zoo Biol. 2015 Jul-Aug;34(4):345-59
pubmed: 26473202
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2022 May;106(3):630-641
pubmed: 33982342
Anat Embryol (Berl). 1982 Sep;165(1):97-111
pubmed: 7149278
Mamm Biol. 2021;101(6):941-948
pubmed: 34924918
Pol J Vet Sci. 2019 Jun;22(2):337-343
pubmed: 31269357
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2015 Aug;28(8):1155-62
pubmed: 26104524
Acta Vet Scand. 2008 Jun 13;50:17
pubmed: 18554381
J Vet Intern Med. 2001 Sep-Oct;15(5):482-5
pubmed: 11596737
Cell Immunol. 1997 Nov 25;182(1):29-37
pubmed: 9427807
J Equine Vet Sci. 2019 Sep;80:10-15
pubmed: 31443826
J Ultrasound. 2018 Dec;21(4):287-291
pubmed: 30097901