Design and assessment of a penile fracture simulation model.

Educación Education Fractura de pene Penile fracture Simulación Simulation Urology Urología

Journal

Actas urologicas espanolas
ISSN: 2173-5786
Titre abrégé: Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed)
Pays: Spain
ID NLM: 101771154

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Historique:
received: 01 09 2020
accepted: 26 10 2020
pubmed: 26 10 2021
medline: 16 11 2021
entrez: 25 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To design and assess a novel penile fracture simulation model for teaching penile fracture repair. We used a validated circumcision simulator to create a model. Foreskin for a circumcision was divided into two halves. A transverse slit ("simulated fracture") was created on one part of the first half of the foreskin (mimicking "tunica") and was applied over the penile model. A red jelly tablet ("clot") was placed underneath the cut. A second full-length of foreskin was applied over it to cover the defect. The model was assessed by participants and expert faculty at the Urology Simulation Boot Camp. Evaluation was performed using a 5-point Likert Scale questionnaire. Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS Statistics V25. The intra-class correlation was calculated using a "One-way random model". Twenty-two urology trainees and four experts participated in the evaluation. The majority of trainees strongly agreed (59%, n = 13) the model is useful for training with experts similarly agreeing in 75% of cases. The appearance of penile fracture was considered good by both trainees (68%, n = 14) and faculty (75%). Overall, the ability of the model to represent a realistic simulation of the task was considered excellent by 23% of participants and good by 64%. Personal confidence after simulation in managing a similar situation was considered high among trainees. The main difficulties reported were related to fascial planes and urethra. This is the first simulation model for penile fracture repair and has demonstrated face validity at a national urology bootcamp.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34690103
pii: S2173-5786(21)00110-4
doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2020.10.014
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng spa

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

582-586

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

A A Kozan (AA)

Department of Urology, Hull University Teaching Hospital, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, United Kingdom.

M Logan (M)

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Medical Education, Leeds, United Kingdom.

A Parnham (A)

Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.

M Liew (M)

Department of Urology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, United Kingdom.

B Barrass (B)

Luton & Dunstable University Hospital, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Urology, Luton, United Kingdom.

S Venugopal (S)

Department of Urology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

C S Biyani (CS)

Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom. Electronic address: shekharbiyani@hotmail.com.

J Taylor (J)

Department of Urology, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, Scotland, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH