Blood Supply of Cranial Nerves Passing Through the Cavernous Sinus: An Anatomical Study and Its Implications for Microsurgical and Endoscopic Cavernous Sinus Surgery.
abducens nerve
inferolateral trunk
intracavernous cranial nerves
meningohypophyseal trunk
oculomotor nerve
trigeminal nerve
trochlear nerve
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
13
05
2021
accepted:
21
09
2021
entrez:
25
10
2021
pubmed:
26
10
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite improvements in surgical techniques, cranial nerve (CN) deficits remain the most frequent cause of disability following cavernous sinus (CS) surgery. The most common tumor affecting the CS is meningioma. They originate from lateral wall and have their blood supply from meningohypophyseal trunk (MHT) and inferolateral trunk (ILT). Pituitary adenomas commonly invade the CS through its medial wall and receive blood supply form medial branches of the internal carotid artery (ICA) (superior and inferior hypophyseal arteries). Some tumors may grow within the CS (e.g. trigeminal schwannomas, hemangiomas). These tumors are fed by all the intracavernous ICA branches. Tumors involving the CS may also displace the neurovascular structures, therefore, a better understanding of intracavernous neurovascular anatomy may reduce the postoperative morbidity associated with approaching CS tumors. In this anatomical study, the anatomic variations and their clinical implications of the intracavernous CNs' blood supply were evaluated through transcranial and endonasal routes. Twenty sides of ten adult cadaveric formalin-fixed, latex-injected specimens were dissected in stepwise fashion under microscopic and endoscopic magnification. The origin and course of the intracavernous ICA branches supplying the intracavernous CNs are studied. The proximal segment of the oculomotor nerve receives blood supply from the ILT in 85%, and the tentorial artery of the MHT in 15% of specimens. The distal segment is exclusively supplied by the ILT. The proximal trochlear nerve receives blood supply from the ILT (75%) and the tentorial artery (25%); the distal segment is exclusively supplied by the superior orbital branch. The proximal third of the abducens nerve receives its vascularity exclusively from the dorsal meningeal artery, and its middle and distal thirds from the ILT. The ophthalmic and proximal maxillary segments of the trigeminal nerve also receive blood supply from the ILT. The distal maxillary segment is supplied by the artery of the foramen rotundum. All ILT branches terminate on the inferomedial aspects of the intra-cavernous CNs. Extensive anastomoses are found between ILT branches and the branches arising from external carotid artery. Understanding the anatomy of the intracavernous ICA's branches is important to improving surgical outcomes with tumors involving the CS.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite improvements in surgical techniques, cranial nerve (CN) deficits remain the most frequent cause of disability following cavernous sinus (CS) surgery. The most common tumor affecting the CS is meningioma. They originate from lateral wall and have their blood supply from meningohypophyseal trunk (MHT) and inferolateral trunk (ILT). Pituitary adenomas commonly invade the CS through its medial wall and receive blood supply form medial branches of the internal carotid artery (ICA) (superior and inferior hypophyseal arteries). Some tumors may grow within the CS (e.g. trigeminal schwannomas, hemangiomas). These tumors are fed by all the intracavernous ICA branches. Tumors involving the CS may also displace the neurovascular structures, therefore, a better understanding of intracavernous neurovascular anatomy may reduce the postoperative morbidity associated with approaching CS tumors. In this anatomical study, the anatomic variations and their clinical implications of the intracavernous CNs' blood supply were evaluated through transcranial and endonasal routes.
METHODS
METHODS
Twenty sides of ten adult cadaveric formalin-fixed, latex-injected specimens were dissected in stepwise fashion under microscopic and endoscopic magnification. The origin and course of the intracavernous ICA branches supplying the intracavernous CNs are studied.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The proximal segment of the oculomotor nerve receives blood supply from the ILT in 85%, and the tentorial artery of the MHT in 15% of specimens. The distal segment is exclusively supplied by the ILT. The proximal trochlear nerve receives blood supply from the ILT (75%) and the tentorial artery (25%); the distal segment is exclusively supplied by the superior orbital branch. The proximal third of the abducens nerve receives its vascularity exclusively from the dorsal meningeal artery, and its middle and distal thirds from the ILT. The ophthalmic and proximal maxillary segments of the trigeminal nerve also receive blood supply from the ILT. The distal maxillary segment is supplied by the artery of the foramen rotundum. All ILT branches terminate on the inferomedial aspects of the intra-cavernous CNs. Extensive anastomoses are found between ILT branches and the branches arising from external carotid artery.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Understanding the anatomy of the intracavernous ICA's branches is important to improving surgical outcomes with tumors involving the CS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34692480
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.702574
pmc: PMC8531550
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
702574Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Najera, Ibrahim, Muhsen, Ali, Sanchez, Obrzut, Borghei-Razavi and Adada.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Neurosurg. 1974 Feb;40(2):244-8
pubmed: 4809123
Neuroradiology. 1977 Jul 29;13(5):267-72
pubmed: 896036
Radiology. 2000 May;215(2):463-9
pubmed: 10796926
Neurosurgery. 2008 May;62(5 Suppl 2):ONS305-10; discussion ONS310-1
pubmed: 18596508
Ann Anat. 1998 Aug;180(4):343-8
pubmed: 9728276
Neurosurgery. 1987 Feb;20(2):205-10
pubmed: 3561725
Neurosurgery. 1994 Feb;34(2):275-9;discussion 279
pubmed: 8177389
Neurochirurgie. 1995;41(6):403-12
pubmed: 8815415
Surg Neurol. 1988 Nov;30(5):370-81
pubmed: 3187882
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2008 Jul;110(7):682-6
pubmed: 18554776
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991 Sep-Oct;12(5):977-84
pubmed: 1950934
J Neurosurg. 1976 Aug;45(2):169-80
pubmed: 939976
J Neurosurg. 2018 Mar 1;:1-8
pubmed: 29600913
J Neurosurg Sci. 2007 Sep;51(3):129-38
pubmed: 17641577
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995 Mar;16(3):483-5
pubmed: 7793369
J Neurosurg. 1983 Jun;58(6):824-31
pubmed: 6854374
Surg Radiol Anat. 2017 May;39(5):485-496
pubmed: 27830321
J Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;129(2):430-441
pubmed: 28862552
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2016 Oct 15;56(10):585-591
pubmed: 27298261
Neurosurgery. 2001 Apr;48(4):827-36; discussion 836-7
pubmed: 11322443
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999 Jun-Jul;20(6):1061-7
pubmed: 10445445
J Neurosurg. 1995 May;82(5):711-8
pubmed: 7714594
Surg Radiol Anat. 1987;9(3):201-15
pubmed: 3122341