Four Decades of Military Posttraumatic Stress: Protocol for a Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Treatment Approaches and Efficacy.
Canada
disorder
efficacy
meta-analysis
military
military personnel
pharmacotherapy
posttraumatic
posttraumatic stress disorder
psychotherapy
review
stress
stress disorders
systematic review
therapy
treatment
veteran
Journal
JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Oct 2021
25 Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
25
08
2021
accepted:
21
09
2021
revised:
20
09
2021
entrez:
25
10
2021
pubmed:
26
10
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Over 85% of active members of the Canadian Armed Forces have been exposed to potentially traumatic events linked to the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). At the time of transition to civilian life, as high as 1 in 8 veterans may be diagnosed with PTSD. Given the high prevalence of PTSD in military and veteran populations, the provision of effective treatment considering their unique challenges and experiences is critical for mental health support and the well-being of these populations. This paper presents the protocol for a meta-analysis and systematic review that will examine the effectiveness of treatment approaches for military-related PTSD. This PROSPERO-preregistered meta-analysis is being conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and Cochrane guidelines. A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using the databases PsycInfo, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertation & Theses. Effect sizes will be computed based on changes in PTSD symptom scores over time across studies using validated PTSD scales. A multilevel meta-analysis will examine the overall effects, between-study effects, and within-study effects of available evidence for PTSD treatments in military populations. Effect sizes will be compared between pharmacotherapeutic, psychotherapeutic, and alternative/emerging treatment interventions. Finally, meta-regression and subgroup analyses will explore the moderating roles of clinical characteristics (eg, PTSD symptom clusters), treatment approaches (eg, therapeutic orientations in psychotherapy and alternative therapies and classifications of drugs in pharmacotherapy), as well as treatment characteristics (eg, length of intervention) on treatment outcomes. The literature search was completed on April 14, 2021. After the removal of duplicates, a total of 12,002 studies were screened for inclusion. As of July 2021, title and abstract screening has been completed, with 1469 out of 12,002 (12.23%) studies included for full-text review. Full review is expected to be completed in the summer of 2021, with initial results expected for publication by early winter of 2021. This meta-analysis will provide information on the current state of evidence on the efficacy and effectiveness of various treatment approaches for military-related PTSD and identify factors that may influence treatment outcomes. The results will inform clinical decision-making for service providers and service users. Finally, the findings will provide insights into future treatment development and practice recommendations to better support the well-being of military and veteran populations. PROSPERO CRD42021245754; https://tinyurl.com/y9u57c59. DERR1-10.2196/33151.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Over 85% of active members of the Canadian Armed Forces have been exposed to potentially traumatic events linked to the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). At the time of transition to civilian life, as high as 1 in 8 veterans may be diagnosed with PTSD. Given the high prevalence of PTSD in military and veteran populations, the provision of effective treatment considering their unique challenges and experiences is critical for mental health support and the well-being of these populations.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This paper presents the protocol for a meta-analysis and systematic review that will examine the effectiveness of treatment approaches for military-related PTSD.
METHODS
METHODS
This PROSPERO-preregistered meta-analysis is being conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and Cochrane guidelines. A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using the databases PsycInfo, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertation & Theses. Effect sizes will be computed based on changes in PTSD symptom scores over time across studies using validated PTSD scales. A multilevel meta-analysis will examine the overall effects, between-study effects, and within-study effects of available evidence for PTSD treatments in military populations. Effect sizes will be compared between pharmacotherapeutic, psychotherapeutic, and alternative/emerging treatment interventions. Finally, meta-regression and subgroup analyses will explore the moderating roles of clinical characteristics (eg, PTSD symptom clusters), treatment approaches (eg, therapeutic orientations in psychotherapy and alternative therapies and classifications of drugs in pharmacotherapy), as well as treatment characteristics (eg, length of intervention) on treatment outcomes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The literature search was completed on April 14, 2021. After the removal of duplicates, a total of 12,002 studies were screened for inclusion. As of July 2021, title and abstract screening has been completed, with 1469 out of 12,002 (12.23%) studies included for full-text review. Full review is expected to be completed in the summer of 2021, with initial results expected for publication by early winter of 2021.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis will provide information on the current state of evidence on the efficacy and effectiveness of various treatment approaches for military-related PTSD and identify factors that may influence treatment outcomes. The results will inform clinical decision-making for service providers and service users. Finally, the findings will provide insights into future treatment development and practice recommendations to better support the well-being of military and veteran populations.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
PROSPERO CRD42021245754; https://tinyurl.com/y9u57c59.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
UNASSIGNED
DERR1-10.2196/33151.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34694228
pii: v10i10e33151
doi: 10.2196/33151
pmc: PMC8576591
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e33151Informations de copyright
©Jenny J W Liu, Anthony Nazarov, Bethany Easterbrook, Rachel A Plouffe, Tri Le, Callista Forchuk, Alec Brandwood, Kate St Cyr, Edouard Auger, Ken Balderson, Mathieu Bilodeau, Amer M Burhan, Murray W Enns, Patrick Smith, Fardous Hosseiny, Gabrielle Dupuis, Maya Roth, Natalie Mota, Vicky Lavoie, J Don Richardson. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 25.10.2021.
Références
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015 Jun;17(2):141-50
pubmed: 26246789
Psychiatr Serv. 2004 May;55(5):519-31
pubmed: 15128960
Psychol Assess. 2016 Oct;28(10):1159-1165
pubmed: 26691507
JAMA. 2012 Aug 15;308(7):700-9
pubmed: 22893167
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 19;17(8):e1003262
pubmed: 32813696
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 May 1;65(5):591-602
pubmed: 24638076
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct;31(10):1206-11
pubmed: 27170304
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Oct 29;9(10):e20620
pubmed: 33118957
World Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;18(3):259-269
pubmed: 31496089
Psychol Assess. 2016 Oct;28(10):1166-1171
pubmed: 26691504
Transl Psychiatry. 2020 May 28;10(1):168
pubmed: 32467579
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 25;12(7):e0181647
pubmed: 28742837
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Nov 02;12:258
pubmed: 30450043
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 07;6:1121
pubmed: 26300817
Mil Med. 2009 May;174(5):460-9
pubmed: 20731275
J Trauma Stress. 2011 Aug;24(4):465-9
pubmed: 21793047
J Trauma Stress. 2022 Feb;35(1):66-77
pubmed: 34048602
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2017 Oct;15(4):411-419
pubmed: 31975872
Can J Psychiatry. 2015 Nov;60(11):488-96
pubmed: 26720506
Perm J. 2014 Winter;18(1):71-7
pubmed: 24626074
Mil Med. 2018 May 1;183(5-6):e223-e231
pubmed: 29415222
P T. 2016 Oct;41(10):623-634
pubmed: 27757001
Assessment. 2017 Jun;24(4):503-516
pubmed: 26603115
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
J Anxiety Disord. 2019 Oct;67:102133
pubmed: 31472332
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Apr;137(4):342-354
pubmed: 29504125
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;5(6):486-497
pubmed: 29728331
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Jan 26;12(1):1802920
pubmed: 34992738
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Apr;1(2):97-111
pubmed: 26061376
J Psychother Integr. 2019 Mar;29(1):15-22
pubmed: 31534308
Brain Sci. 2018 Jan 20;8(1):
pubmed: 29361705
Environ Int. 2020 May;138:105623
pubmed: 32203803